Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is related to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, including coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated the association between OSA and the severity of CAD by assessing coronary angiography findings. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent their first coronary angiography to evaluate CAD and polysomnography (PSG) to investigate the severity of OSA in our hospital from March 2002 to May 2015. The severity of CAD was determined based on coronary angiography findings using the SYNTAX score. The patients were divided into two groups according to the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI): mild OSA (AHI < 15/h) and moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15/h). Overall, 98 patients were enrolled. The SYNTAX score was significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.001). After adjustment for other risk factors, including age, sex, obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, and family history of CAD, moderate-to-severe OSA significantly correlated to the SYNTAX score (partial correlations = 0.24, p = 0.039). These results suggest that the severity of CAD is related to moderate-to-severe OSA.

Introduction: Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) devices are designed to suppress central respiratory events, and therefore effective for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with heart failure (HF) and provide information about their residual respiratory events. However, whether the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), determined by the ASV device AutoSet CS (ASC), correlates with the AHI calculated by polysomnography (PSG) in patients with HF and SDB remains to be evaluated.Methods: Consecutive patients with SDB titrated on ASC were included in the study. We assessed the correlation between AHI determined by manual scoring during PSG (AHI-PSG) and that determined by the ASC device (AHI-ASC) during an overnight session.Results: Thirty patients with HF and SDB (age, 68.8 ± 15.4 years; two women; left ventricular ejection fraction, 53.8 ± 17.9%) were included. The median AHI in the diagnostic study was 28.4 events/h, including both obstructive and central respiratory events. During the titration, ASC markedly suppressed the respiratory events (AHI-PSG, 3.3 events/h), while the median AHI-ASC was 12.8 events/h. We identified a modest correlation between AHI-PSG and AHI-ASC (r = 0.36, p = 0.048). The Brand-Altman plot indicated that the ASC device overestimated the AHI, and a moderate agreement was observed with PSG.Conclusions: There was only a modest correlation between AHI-PSG and AHI-ASC. The discrepancy may be explained by either the central respiratory events that occur during wakefulness or the other differences between PSG and ASC in the detected respiratory events. Therefore, clinicians should consider this divergence when assessing residual respiratory events using ASC.

Background: Abnormal respiration during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) with deep sedation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) can affect the procedure’s success. However, the respiratory pattern during RFCA with deep sedation remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate abnormal respiration during RFCA and its relationship with sleep apnea in patients with AF. Methods: We included patients with AF who underwent RFCA with cardiorespiratory monitoring using a portable polygraph both at night and during RFCA with deep sedation. The patients were divided based on the administered sedative medicines. Results: We included 40 patients with AF. An overnight sleep study revealed that 27 patients had sleep apnea; among them, 9 showed central predominance. During RFCA with deep sedation, 15 patients showed an abnormal respiratory pattern, with 14 patients showing obstructive predominance. Further, 17 and 23 patients were administered with propofol alone and dexmedetomidine plus propofol, respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the respiratory event index (REI) at night (7.9 vs. 9.3, p = 0.744). However, compared with the group that received dexmedetomidine plus propofol, the propofol-alone group showed a higher REI during RFCA (5.4 vs. 2.6, p = 0.048), more frequent use of the airway (47% vs. 13%, p = 0.030), and a higher dose of administered propofol (3.9 mg/h/kg vs. 1.2 mg/h/kg, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that only the propofol amount was associated with REI during RFCA (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that respiratory events during RFCA with deep sedation were mainly obstructive. Propofol should be administered with dexmedetomidine rather than alone to reduce the propofol amount and avoid respiratory instability.