To develop and validate grading scales for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) that allow consistent diagnosis of MGD and are suitable for clinical studies. Development and validation study of grading scales. Lid margin and meibomian gland photographs were taken in the multicenter, prospective cross-sectional study for MGD and control subjects. New grading scales for MGD signs (abnormal lid margin findings of vascularity, plugging of gland orifices, lid margin irregularity, lid margin thickening, partial glands, and gland dropout) in both upper and lower eyelids were developed. Three MGD experts, 3 general ophthalmologists, and 3 non-physicians independently tested the scales by evaluating photographs. The levels of interrater and intrarater agreement for each grading scale were estimated with the use of kappa statistics. Thirty-eight patients with MGD and 20 control subjects were enrolled and photographed. New grading scales were developed using a total of 226 photographs. The interrater kappa values for MGD experts and for general ophthalmologists and non-physicians with reference to an MGD expert ranged from 0.36 to 0.87 (median of 0.66), 0.41 to 0.73 (0.60), and 0.30 to 0.77 (0.59), respectively. Those for intrarater reliability for 2 MGD experts ranged from 0.49 to 0.93 (0.82). New grading scales for MGD signs were developed and found to have appropriate inter- and intrarater reliabilities for grading MGD. These grading scales are suitable for MGD diagnosis and application to multicenter trials.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) combined with meibomian gland expression (MGX) for treatment of refractory meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Ninety eyes of 45 patients were randomly assigned to receive either the combination of IPL and MGX or MGX alone (control). Each eye underwent eight treatment sessions at 3-week intervals. Parameters were evaluated before and during treatment as well as at 3-11 weeks after the last treatment session. Measured parameters included the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire score, noninvasive breakup time (NIBUT), fluorescein breakup time (BUT), lipid layer grade, lipid layer thickness (LLT), lid margin abnormalities, corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining (CFS) score, meibum grade, and meiboscore. A significant improvement in lipid layer grade was apparent in the IPL-MGX group from 6 to 32 weeks after treatment onset (adjusted P < 0.001) but was not observed in the control group. The IPL-MGX group also showed significant improvements in LLT, NIBUT, BUT, lid margin abnormalities, and meibum grade compared with the control group at 24 and 32 weeks (adjusted P < 0.001) as well as significant improvements in the SPEED score at 32 weeks (adjusted P = 0.044) and in CFS score at 24 (adjusted P = 0.015) and 32 (adjusted P = 0.006) weeks. The combination of IPL and MGX improved homeostasis of the tear film and ameliorated ocular symptoms in patients with refractory MGD and is thus a promising modality for treatment of this condition.

Aims To evaluate objectively the meibomian gland area using newly developed software for non-invasive meibography. Methods Eighty eyelids of 42 patients without meibomian gland loss (meiboscore=0), 105 eyelids of 57 patients with loss of less than one-third total meibomian gland area (meiboscore=1), 13 eyelids of 11 patients with between one-third and two-thirds loss of meibomian gland area (meiboscore=2) and 20 eyelids of 14 patients with two-thirds loss of meibomian gland area (meiboscore=3) were studied. Lid borders were automatically determined. The software evaluated the distribution of the luminance and, by enhancing the contrast and reducing image noise, the meibomian gland area was automatically discriminated. The software calculated the ratio of the total meibomian gland area relative to the total analysis area in all subjects. Repeatability of the software was also evaluated. Results The mean ratio of the meibomian gland area to the total analysis area in the upper/lower eyelids was 51.9±5.7%/54.7±5.4% in subjects with a meiboscore of 0, 47.7±6.0%/51.5±5.4% in those with a meiboscore of 1, 32.0±4.4%/37.2±3.5% in those with a meiboscore of 2 and 16.7±6.4%/19.5±5.8% in subjects with a meiboscore of 3. Conclusions The meibomian gland area was objectively evaluated using the developed software. This system could be useful for objectively evaluating the effect of treatment on meibomian gland dysfunction.