Ali Atan

Prof. Dr. Ali Atan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 August 2014 in Renal Failure
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMelih Balci
Melih Balci
ATAltug Tuncel
Altug Tuncel
OAOmur Aydin
Omur Aydin
YAYilmaz Aslan
Yilmaz Aslan
OGOzer Guzel
Ozer Guzel
AAAli Atan
Ali Atan
We evaluated the efficacy of tamsulosin and nifedipine in medical expulsive therapy (MET) in patients with distal ureteral stone. In addition, we tried to determine the predictive value of Hounsfield Unit (HU) of the stone in the success of MET. A total of 75 patients with a distal ureteral stone of 5–10 mm diameter were randomly divided into three groups. Group 1 (n = 25) received tamsulosin 0.4 mg/d; group 2 (n = 25) received nifedipine 10 mg/day p.o and group 3 (n = 25) received diclofenac sodium 50 mg p.o. when required. At the beginning of each treatment, the HU of the stone was also measured using a non-contrast computerized tomography in all the patients. The results were evaluated at week four. The mean age of the patients was 36.8 (range, 16–68) years. Stone expulsion was observed in 19 (76%) patients in group 1, 16 (64%) patients in group 2 and 9 (36%) patients in group 3 (pgroup1-3 = 0.004, pgroup2-3 = 0.048 and pgroup1-2 = 0.355). The mean expulsion time was 9, 9.1 and 10.3 d, respectively (pgroup1-3 < 0.001, pgroup2-3 < 0.001 and pgroup1-2 = 0.619). The mean diclofenac sodium dose per patient was 544, 602 and 1408 mg in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (pgroup1-3 < 0.001, pgroup2-3 < 0.001 and pgroup1-2 = 0.977). The mean HU of the stone in patients with and without a successful MET was 363 and 389, respectively (p = 0.462). Our results showed that MET with both nifedipine and tamsulosin provided a similar increase in the expulsion rate for distal ureteral stones. HU does not seem to be a predictive parameter for stone expulsion.

1 January 2013 in Urology Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAli Atan
Ali Atan
ÖGÖzer Güzel
Özer Güzel
Since from its clinical introduction to the present time, measurement of serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) level is one of the most widely used tests in urology practice. Initially, the upper limit for PSA was 4 ng/mL, but today, a reduction for the upper limit is recommended to 2.5-3 ng/mL for patients between 60 and 65 years and younger. On the use of PSA as a screening test for prostate cancer, there are differences of opinion. However, it is a recommended test in the evaluation and monitoring of the risky group for prostate cancer. All in all, together with a good patient information, PSA test should be performed at appropriate intervals for appropriate people with an appropriate age.

17 January 2005 in International Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
UTUmit Yener Tekdogan
Umit Yener Tekdogan
FCFatih Canakli
Fatih Canakli
YAYilmaz Aslan
Yilmaz Aslan
OHOzge Han
Ozge Han
SGSefa Gungor
Sefa Gungor
AAAli Atan
Ali Atan

4 February 2015 in International Urology and Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMelih Balci
Melih Balci
ATAltug Tuncel
Altug Tuncel
OGOzer Guzel
Ozer Guzel
YAYilmaz Aslan
Yilmaz Aslan
TSTezcan Sezgin
Tezcan Sezgin
AAAli Atan
Ali Atan

1 June 2008 in Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAltug Tuncel
Altug Tuncel
YAYilmaz Aslan
Yilmaz Aslan
TSTezcan Sezgin
Tezcan Sezgin
OAOmur Aydin
Omur Aydin
UTUmit Tekdogan
Umit Tekdogan
AAAli Atan
Ali Atan

25 July 2013 in International Urology and Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AUAli Unsal
Ali Unsal
UOUral Oguz
Ural Oguz
ATAltug Tuncel
Altug Tuncel
OBOmer Faruk Bozkurt
Omer Faruk Bozkurt
YAYilmaz Aslan
Yilmaz Aslan
AAAli Atan
Ali Atan