The flavonoid pathway produces a diverse array of plant compounds with functions in UV protection, as antioxidants, pigments, auxin transport regulators, defence compounds against pathogens and during signalling in symbiosis. This review highlights some of the known function of flavonoids in the rhizosphere, in particular for the interaction of roots with microorganisms. Depending on their structure, flavonoids have been shown to stimulate or inhibit rhizobial nod gene expression, cause chemoattraction of rhizobia towards the root, inhibit root pathogens, stimulate mycorrhizal spore germination and hyphal branching, mediate allelopathic interactions between plants, affect quorum sensing, and chelate soil nutrients. Therefore, the manipulation of the flavonoid pathway to synthesize specifically certain products has been suggested as an avenue to improve root-rhizosphere interactions. Possible strategies to alter flavonoid exudation to the rhizosphere are discussed. Possible challenges in that endeavour include limited knowledge of the mechanisms that regulate flavonoid transport and exudation, unforeseen effects of altering parts of the flavonoid synthesis pathway on fluxes elsewhere in the pathway, spatial heterogeneity of flavonoid exudation along the root, as well as alteration of flavonoid products by microorganisms in the soil. In addition, the overlapping functions of many flavonoids as stimulators of functions in one organism and inhibitors of another suggests caution in attempts to manipulate flavonoid rhizosphere signals.
2 January 2003 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Many bacteria use N -acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) signals to coordinate the behavior of individual cells in a local population. The successful infection of eukaryotic hosts by bacteria seems to depend particularly on such AHL-mediated “quorum-sensing” regulation. We have used proteome analysis to show that a eukaryotic host, the model legume Medicago truncatula , is able to detect nanomolar to micromolar concentrations of bacterial AHLs from both symbiotic ( Sinorhizobium meliloti ) and pathogenic ( Pseudomonas aeruginosa ) bacteria, and that it responds in a global manner by significant changes in the accumulation of over 150 proteins, 99 of which have been identified by peptide mass fingerprinting. The accumulation of specific proteins and isoforms depended on AHL structure, concentration, and time of exposure. AHLs were also found to induce tissue-specific activation of β-glucuronidase ( GUS ) reporter fusions to an auxin-responsive and three chalcone synthase promoters, consistent with AHL-induced changes in the accumulation of auxin-responsive and flavonoid synthesis proteins. In addition, exposure to AHLs was found to induce changes in the secretion of compounds by the plants that mimic quorum-sensing signals and thus have the potential to disrupt quorum sensing in associated bacteria. Our results indicate that eukaryotes have an extensive range of functional responses to AHLs that may play important roles in the beneficial or pathogenic outcomes of eukaryote–prokaryote interactions.
Summary: The expression of the auxin responsive reporter construct, GH3:gusA, was examined in transgenic white clover plants to assess changes in the auxin balance during the earliest stages of root nodule formation. Reporter gene expression was monitored at marked locations after the application of bacteria or signal molecules using two precise inoculation techniques: spot‐inoculation and a novel method for ballistic microtargeting. Changes in GH3:gusA expression were monitored after the inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii, non‐host rhizobia, lipo‐chitin oligosaccharides (LCOs), chitin oligosaccharides, a synthetic auxin transport inhibitor (naphthylphthalamic acid; NPA), auxin, the ENOD40–1 peptide or different flavonoids. The results show that clover‐nodulating rhizobia induce a rapid, transient and local downregulation of GH3:gusA expression during nodule initiation followed by an upregulation of reporter gene expression at the site of nodule initiation. Microtargeting of auxin caused a local and acropetal upregulation of GH3:gusA expression, whereas NPA caused local and acropetal downregulation of expression. Both spot‐inoculation and microtargeting of R. l. bv. trifolii LCOs or flavonoid aglycones induced similar changes to GH3:gusA expression as NPA. O‐acetylated chitin oligosaccharides caused similar changes to GH3:gusA expression as R. l. bv. trifolii spot‐inoculation, but only after delivery by microtargeting. Non‐O‐acetylated chitin oligosaccharides, flavonoid glucosides or the ENOD40–1 peptide failed to induce any detectable changes in GH3:gusA expression. GH3:gusA expression patterns during the later stages of nodule and lateral root development were similar. These results support the hypothesis that LCOs and chitin oligosaccharides act by perturbing the auxin flow in the root during the earliest stages of nodule formation, and that endogenous flavonoids could mediate this response.
Background: Plants encode a large number of leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases. Legumes encode several LRR-RLK linked to the process of root nodule formation, the ligands of which are unknown. To identify ligands for these receptors, we used a combination of profile hidden Markov models and position-specific iterative BLAST, allowing us to detect new members of the CLV3/ESR (CLE) protein family from publicly available sequence databases. Results: We identified 114 new members of the CLE protein family from various plant species, as well as five protein sequences containing multiple CLE domains. We were able to cluster the CLE domain proteins into 13 distinct groups based on their pairwise similarities in the primary CLE motif. In addition, we identified secondary motifs that coincide with our sequence clusters. The groupings based on the CLE motifs correlate with known biological functions of CLE signaling peptides and are analogous to groupings based on phylogenetic analysis and ectopic overexpression studies. We tested the biological function of two of the predicted CLE signaling peptides in the legume Medicago truncatula. These peptides inhibit the activity of the root apical and lateral root meristems in a manner consistent with our functional predictions based on other CLE signaling peptides clustering in the same groups. Conclusion: Our analysis provides an identification and classification of a large number of novel potential CLE signaling peptides. The additional motifs we found could lead to future discovery of recognition sites for processing peptidases as well as predictions for receptor binding specificity.