Michael Danquah

Prof. Michael Danquah


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 April 2018 in Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JJJaison Jeevanandam
Jaison Jeevanandam
Ahmed BarhoumAhmed Barhoum
Ahmed Barhoum
YCYen San Chan
Yen San Chan
Alain DufresneAlain Dufresne
Alain Dufresne
MDMichael Danquah
Michael Danquah
Nanomaterials (NMs) have gained prominence in technological advancements due to their tunable physical, chemical and biological properties with enhanced performance over their bulk counterparts. NMs are categorized depending on their size, composition, shape, and origin. The ability to predict the unique properties of NMs increases the value of each classification. Due to increased growth of production of NMs and their industrial applications, issues relating to toxicity are inevitable. The aim of this review is to compare synthetic (engineered) and naturally occurring nanoparticles (NPs) and nanostructured materials (NSMs) to identify their nanoscale properties and to define the specific knowledge gaps related to the risk assessment of NPs and NSMs in the environment. The review presents an overview of the history and classifications of NMs and gives an overview of the various sources of NPs and NSMs, from natural to synthetic, and their toxic effects towards mammalian cells and tissue. Additionally, the types of toxic reactions associated with NPs and NSMs and the regulations implemented by different countries to reduce the associated risks are also discussed.

1 January 2010 in Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NUNyomi Uduman
Nyomi Uduman
YQYing Qi
Ying Qi
MDMichael Danquah
Michael Danquah
GFGareth M. Forde
Gareth M. Forde
Andrew Forbes Alexander HoadleyAndrew Forbes Alexander Hoadley
Andrew Forbes Alexander Hoadley
Microalgae dewatering is a major obstruction to industrial-scale processing of microalgae for biofuel production. The dilute nature of harvested microalgal cultures creates a huge operational cost during dewatering, thereby, rendering algae-based fuels less economically attractive. Currently there is no superior method of dewatering microalgae. A technique that may result in a greater algal biomass may have drawbacks such as a high capital cost or high energy consumption. The choice of which harvesting technique to apply will depend on the species of microalgae and the final product desired. Algal properties such as a large cell size and the capability of the microalgae to autoflocculate can simplify the dewatering process. This article reviews and addresses the various technologies currently used for dewatering microalgal cultures along with a comparative study of the performances of the different technologies.

1 May 2012 in Biotechnology Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRonald Halim
Ronald Halim
MDMichael Danquah
Michael Danquah
PWPaul A. Webley
Paul A. Webley

1 April 2010 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRazif Harun
Razif Harun
MSManjinder Singh
Manjinder Singh
GFGareth M. Forde
Gareth M. Forde
MDMichael Danquah
Michael Danquah

1 January 2011 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRonald Halim
Ronald Halim
BGBrendan Gladman
Brendan Gladman
MDMichael Danquah
Michael Danquah
PWPaul A. Webley
Paul A. Webley

4 November 2009 in Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHRazif Harun
Razif Harun
MDMichael Danquah
Michael Danquah
GFGareth M. Forde
Gareth M. Forde