Backgrounds/Aims. Watson for Oncology (WFO) is a cognitive technology that processes medical information by analyzing the latest evidence and guidelines. However, studies of the concordance rate between WFO and clinicians for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) are lacking.Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 65 patients with AGC who consulted WFO and the Gachon Gil Medical Center multidisciplinary team (GMDT) in 2016 and 2017. The recommendations of WFO were compared with the opinions of the GMDT. WFO provided three treatment options: recommended (first treatment option), for consideration (second treatment option), and not recommended.Results. In total, 65 patients (mean age 61.0 years; 44 males and 21 females) were included in the study. The concordance rate between WFO and the GMDT was 41.5% (27/65) at the recommended level and 87.7% (57/65) at the for consideration level. The main causes of discordance between WFO and the GMDT were as follows. First, WFO did not consider the medical history. Second, WFO recommended the use of agents that are considered outdated in Korea. Third, some patients wanted to be involved in a clinical trial. Fourth, some patients refused to use the biologic agents recommended by WFO for financial reasons as they were not covered by medical insurance.Conclusions. The concordance rate at the recommended level was relatively low but was higher at the for consideration level. Discordances arose mainly from the different medical circumstances at the Gachon Gil Medical Center (GMC) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), the main WFO consulting center. The utility of WFO as a tool for supporting clinical decision making could be further improved by incorporating regional guidelines.

Chung CS, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Mar;32(3):421-426. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.3.421

Tailored eradication strategy vs concomitant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in Korean patients

Kim JH, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Jun;31(6):873-878. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.6.873

Background: Dysphagia associated with neurologic disorders is a problem worldwide. However, few studies have assessed the efficacy of endoscopic botulinum toxin injections into the cricopharyngeal muscle using a pharyngoscope. Methods: Fourteen patients who received an endoscopic botulinum toxin injection due to cricopharyngeal muscle dysfunction and a neurological disorder from 2006 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed at a single tertiary medical center. The toxin was injected at a 100 international unit (IU) total dose under direct endoscopic vision. The success of the procedure was evaluated comprehensively using the following: clinical resolution of the previous symptoms, functional oral intake scale (FOIS) for the clinical evaluation of swallowing, and videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) to check decreased retention of barium at the pyriform sinus and the epiglottic vallecula. Results: The study included 12 males and 2 females (mean age, 58 years old; range, 37–82 years). Three patients (21.4%) were confirmed clinically and eleven were confirmed by VFSS. Eleven patients (78.6%) were managed successfully with the injection. Three patients (21.4%) did not improve despite the injection. Conclusion: An endoscopic botulinum toxin injection may be a good treatment option for patients with dysphagia and cricopharyngeal dysfunction due to a neurological disorder. Large, prospective, long-term follow-up studies are needed in the future.