Vasiliki Tzelepi

Dr. Vasiliki Tzelepi

Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 December 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IGIoanna Maria Grypari
Ioanna Maria Grypari
Vasiliki ZolotaVasiliki Zolota
Vasiliki Zolota
VTVasiliki Tzelepi
Vasiliki Tzelepi
Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy in men, and prostatectomy is the treatment of choice for most patients with at least low risk of progression. The presence of positive margins in the radical prostatectomy specimen is considered an adverse pathologic feature, and may prompt additional therapeutic intervention in the patients. The absence of a distinct capsule around the prostate and intraoperative manipulations that aim to minimize postoperative adverse effects, complicate its wide removal. Proper handling of the specimen during the gross processing is essential for accurate determination of the status of margins or resection. Positive margins, defined as the presence of neoplastic glands in the highlighted-with-ink margin of resection, range from 6–38%. The surgical technique, surgeon’s expertise and tumor (i.e., grade and stage) and patients’ (i.e., BMI) characteristics affect the rate of margin positivity. Extensive or multifocal and nonanterior/nonapical positive margins are linked with higher recurrence rates, especially in organ-confined disease, underscoring the need for treating these patients more aggressively. In summary, detailed description of the status of the margins should be performed in every pathology report to determine patients’ prognosis and the most appropriate therapeutic plan.

20 February 2012 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EEEleni Efstathiou
Eleni Efstathiou
MTMark Titus
Mark Titus
DTDimitra Tsavachidou
Dimitra Tsavachidou
VTVasiliki Tzelepi
Vasiliki Tzelepi
Sijin WenSijin Wen
Sijin Wen
CLChristopher J. Logothetis
Christopher J. Logothetis
Purpose: Persistent androgen signaling is implicated in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) progression. This study aimed to evaluate androgen signaling in bone marrow–infiltrating cancer and testosterone in blood and bone marrow and to correlate with clinical observations. Patients and Methods: This was an open-label, observational study of 57 patients with bone-metastatic CRPC who underwent transiliac bone marrow biopsy between October 2007 and March 2010. Patients received oral abiraterone acetate (1 g) once daily and prednisone (5 mg) twice daily. Androgen receptor (AR) and CYP17 expression were assessed by immunohistochemistry, testosterone concentration by mass spectrometry, AR copy number by polymerase chain reaction, and TMPRSS2-ERG status by fluorescent in situ hybridization in available tissues. Results: Median overall survival was 555 days (95% CI, 440 to 965+ days). Maximal prostate-specific antigen decline ≥ 50% occurred in 28 (50%) of 56 patients. Homogeneous, intense nuclear expression of AR, combined with ≥ 10% CYP17 tumor expression, was correlated with longer time to treatment discontinuation (> 4 months) in 25 patients with tumor-infiltrated bone marrow samples. Pretreatment CYP17 tumor expression ≥ 10% was correlated with increased bone marrow aspirate testosterone. Blood and bone marrow aspirate testosterone concentrations declined to less than picograms-per-milliliter levels and remained suppressed at progression. Conclusion: The observed pretreatment androgen-signaling signature is consistent with persistent androgen signaling in CRPC bone metastases. This is the first evidence that abiraterone acetate achieves sustained suppression of testosterone in both blood and bone marrow aspirate to less than picograms-per-milliliter levels. Potential admixture of blood with bone marrow aspirate limits our ability to determine the origin of measured testosterone.

31 January 2012 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VTVasiliki Tzelepi
Vasiliki Tzelepi
JZJiexin Zhang
Jiexin Zhang
JLJing-Fang Lu
Jing-Fang Lu
BKBrittany Kleb
Brittany Kleb
GWGuanglin Wu
Guanglin Wu
AAAna M. Aparicio
Ana M. Aparicio
Purpose: Small-cell prostate carcinoma (SCPC) morphology predicts for a distinct clinical behavior, resistance to androgen ablation, and frequent but short responses to chemotherapy. We sought to develop model systems that reflect human SCPC and can improve our understanding of its biology. Experimental Design: We developed a set of castration-resistant prostate carcinomas xenografts and examined their fidelity to their human tumors of origin. We compared the expression and genomic profiles of SCPC and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) xenografts to those of typical prostate adenocarcinoma xenografts. Results were validated immunohistochemically in a panel of 60 human tumors. Results: The reported SCPC and LCNEC xenografts retain high fidelity to their human tumors of origin and are characterized by a marked upregulation of UBE2C and other mitotic genes in the absence of androgen receptor (AR), retinoblastoma (RB1), and cyclin D1 (CCND1) expression. We confirmed these findings in a panel of samples of CRPC patients. In addition, array comparative genomic hybridization of the xenografts showed that the SCPC/LCNEC tumors display more copy number variations than the adenocarcinoma counterparts. Amplification of the UBE2C locus and microdeletions of RB1 were present in a subset, but none displayed AR nor CCND1 deletions. The AR, RB1, and CCND1 promoters showed no CpG methylation in the SCPC xenografts. Conclusion: Modeling human prostate carcinoma with xenografts allows in-depth and detailed studies of its underlying biology. The detailed clinical annotation of the donor tumors enables associations of anticipated relevance to be made. Future studies in the xenografts will address the functional significance of the findings. Clin Cancer Res; 18(3); 666–77. ©2011 AACR.

16 March 2007
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSStavroula Salakou
Stavroula Salakou
DKDimitrios Kardamakis
Dimitrios Kardamakis
ATAthanassios C Tsamandas
Athanassios C Tsamandas
VZVassiliki Zolota
Vassiliki Zolota
EAEfstratios Apostolakis
Efstratios Apostolakis
DDDimitrios Dougenis
Dimitrios Dougenis

1 September 2010 in Nature Reviews Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMaria Karlou
Maria Karlou
VTVasiliki Tzelepi
Vasiliki Tzelepi
EEEleni Efstathiou
Eleni Efstathiou

9 February 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vasiliki ZolotaVasiliki Zolota
Vasiliki Zolota
VTVasiliki Tzelepi
Vasiliki Tzelepi
Zoi PiperigkouZoi Piperigkou
Zoi Piperigkou
HKHelen (Eleni) Kourea
Helen (Eleni) Kourea
EPEfthymia Papakonstantinou
Efthymia Papakonstantinou
Nikos KaramanosNikos Karamanos
Nikos Karamanos
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subgroup of breast cancer characterized by genomic complexity and therapeutic options limited to only standard chemotherapy. Although it has been suggested that stratifying TNBC patients by pathway-specific molecular alterations may predict benefit from specific therapeutic agents, application in routine clinical practice has not yet been established. There is a growing body of the literature supporting that epigenetic modifications comprised by DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling and non-coding RNAs play a fundamental role in TNBC pathogenesis. Extracellular matrix (ECM) is a highly dynamic 3D network of macromolecules with structural and cellular regulatory roles. Alterations in the expression of ECM components result in uncontrolled matrix remodeling, thus affecting its ability to regulate vital functions of cancer cells, including proliferation, migration, adhesion, invasion and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Recent molecular data highlight the major role of tumor microenvironment and ECM alterations in TNBC and approaches for targeting tumor microenvironment have recently been recognized as potential therapeutic strategies. Notably, many of the ECM/EMT modifications in cancer are largely driven by epigenetic events, highlighting the pleiotropic effects of the epigenetic network in TNBC. This article presents and critically discusses the current knowledge on the epigenetic alterations correlated with TNBC pathogenesis, with emphasis on those associated with ECM/EMT modifications, their prognostic and predictive value and their use as therapeutic targets.