James Karr

Dr. James Karr


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 1999 in Freshwater Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJames Karr
James Karr

1 June 2000 in Freshwater Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CDCraig P. Doberstein
Craig P. Doberstein
JKJames Karr
James Karr
LCLoveday L. Conquest
Loveday L. Conquest

2 December 1997 in Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJames Karr
James Karr
ECEllen W. Chu
Ellen W. Chu
(1997). Biological monitoring: Essential foundation for ecological risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal: Vol. 3, The Preidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, pp. 993-1004.

22 September 2015 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dominick A DellaSalaDominick A DellaSala
Dominick A DellaSala
RBRowan Baker
Rowan Baker
DHDoug Heiken
Doug Heiken
CFChris A. Frissell
Chris A. Frissell
JKJames Karr
James Karr
JSJames Strittholt
James Strittholt
The 1994 Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) shifted federal lands management from a focus on timber production to ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation. The plan established a network of conservation reserves and an ecosystem management strategy on ~10 million hectares from northern California to Washington State, USA, within the range of the federally threatened northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina). Several subsequent assessments—and 20 years of data from monitoring programs established under the plan—have demonstrated the effectiveness of this reserve network and ecosystem management approach in making progress toward attaining many of the plan’s conservation and ecosystem management goals. This paper (1) showcases the fundamental conservation biology and ecosystem management principles underpinning the NWFP as a case study for managers interested in large-landscape conservation; and (2) recommends improvements to the plan’s strategy in response to unprecedented climate change and land-use threats. Twenty years into plan implementation, however, the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, under pressure for increased timber harvest, are retreating from conservation measures. We believe that federal agencies should instead build on the NWFP to ensure continuing success in the Pacific Northwest. We urge federal land managers to (1) protect all remaining late-successional/old-growth forests; (2) identify climate refugia for at-risk species; (3) maintain or increase stream buffers and landscape connectivity; (4) decommission and repair failing roads to improve water quality; (5) reduce fire risk in fire-prone tree plantations; and (6) prevent logging after fires in areas of high conservation value. In many respects, the NWFP is instructive for managers considering similar large-scale conservation efforts.

1 January 1984
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
PAPaul L. Angermeier
Paul L. Angermeier
JKJames Karr
James Karr

1 January 2020 in Fisheries
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJames Karr
James Karr