Charles Devine

Mr. Charles Devine

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 January 2025 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZPZoe Amie Pierrat
Zoe Amie Pierrat
TMTroy S. Magney
Troy S. Magney
WRWill P. Richardson
Will P. Richardson
BRBenjamin Reade Kreps Runkle
Benjamin Reade Kreps Runkle
JDJen L. Diehl
Jen L. Diehl
KCKerry Cawse-Nicholson
Kerry Cawse-Nicholson
Summary: A new proliferation of optical instruments that can be attached to towers over or within ecosystems, or ‘proximal’ remote sensing, enables a comprehensive characterization of terrestrial ecosystem structure, function, and fluxes of energy, water, and carbon. Proximal remote sensing can bridge the gap between individual plants, site‐level eddy‐covariance fluxes, and airborne and spaceborne remote sensing by providing continuous data at a high‐spatiotemporal resolution. Here, we review recent advances in proximal remote sensing for improving our mechanistic understanding of plant and ecosystem processes, model development, and validation of current and upcoming satellite missions. We provide current best practices for data availability and metadata for proximal remote sensing: spectral reflectance, solar‐induced fluorescence, thermal infrared radiation, microwave backscatter, and LiDAR. Our paper outlines the steps necessary for making these data streams more widespread, accessible, interoperable, and information‐rich, enabling us to address key ecological questions unanswerable from space‐based observations alone and, ultimately, to demonstrate the feasibility of these technologies to address critical questions in local and global ecology.

2 November 2020 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MEMohammad Reza Ehsani
Mohammad Reza Ehsani
JAJorge Arevalo
Jorge Arevalo
CRChristoforus Bayu Risanto
Christoforus Bayu Risanto
MJMostafa Javadian
Mostafa Javadian
CDCharles Devine
Charles Devine
Ali BehrangiAli Behrangi
Ali Behrangi
Wildfire is a major concern worldwide and particularly in Australia. The 2019–2020 wildfires in Australia became historically significant as they were widespread and extremely severe. Linking climate and vegetation settings to wildfires can provide insightful information for wildfire prediction, and help better understand wildfires behavior in the future. The goal of this research was to examine the relationship between the recent wildfires, various hydroclimatological variables, and satellite-retrieved vegetation indices. The analyses performed here show the uniqueness of the 2019–2020 wildfires. The near-surface air temperature from December 2019 to February 2020 was about 1 °C higher than the 20-year mean, which increased the evaporative demand. The lack of precipitation before the wildfires, due to an enhanced high-pressure system over southeast Australia, prevented the soil from having enough moisture to supply the demand, and set the stage for a large amount of dry fuel that highly favored the spread of the fires.

8 December 2021 in Functional Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FZFangyue Zhang
Fangyue Zhang
JBJoel A. Biederman
Joel A. Biederman
NPNathan A. Pierce
Nathan A. Pierce
DPDaniel L. Potts
Daniel L. Potts
CDCharles Devine
Charles Devine
WSWilliam Smith
William Smith

20 September 2024 in Earth's Future
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Andrew FeldmanAndrew Feldman
Andrew Feldman
SRSasha Reed
Sasha Reed
CACibele Amaral
Cibele Amaral
ABAlicja Babst‐Kostecka
Alicja Babst‐Kostecka
FBFlurin Babst
Flurin Babst
WZWen Zhang
Wen Zhang
Dryland ecosystems cover 40% of our planet's land surface, support billions of people, and are responding rapidly to climate and land use change. These expansive systems also dominate core aspects of Earth's climate, storing and exchanging vast amounts of water, carbon, and energy with the atmosphere. Despite their indispensable ecosystem services and high vulnerability to change, drylands are one of the least understood ecosystem types, partly due to challenges studying their heterogeneous landscapes and misconceptions that drylands are unproductive “wastelands.” Consequently, inadequate understanding of dryland processes has resulted in poor model representation and forecasting capacity, hindering decision making for these at‐risk ecosystems. NASA satellite resources are increasingly available at the higher resolutions needed to enhance understanding of drylands' heterogeneous spatiotemporal dynamics. NASA's Terrestrial Ecology Program solicited proposals for scoping a multi‐year field campaign, of which Adaptation and Response in Drylands (ARID) was one of two scoping studies selected. A primary goal of the scoping study is to gather input from the scientific and data end‐user communities on dryland research gaps and data user needs. Here, we provide an overview of the ARID team's community engagement and how it has guided development of our framework. This includes an ARID kickoff meeting with over 300 participants held in October 2023 at the University of Arizona to gather input from data end‐users and scientists. We also summarize insights gained from hundreds of follow‐up activities, including from a tribal‐engagement focused workshop in New Mexico, conference town halls, intensive roundtables, and international engagements.

13 September 2024 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XHXueli Huo
Xueli Huo
AFAndrew M. Fox
Andrew M. Fox
HDHamid Dashti
Hamid Dashti
CDCharles Devine
Charles Devine
WGWilliam Gallery
William Gallery
DMDavid J. P. Moore
David J. P. Moore

11 May 2026
Verified
Other
Open access
PDF file
Andrew FeldmanAndrew Feldman
Andrew Feldman
WSWilliam K. Smith
William K. Smith
AKAlexandra G. Konings
Alexandra G. Konings
MBMartin J. Baur
Martin J. Baur
MBMarvin Browne
Marvin Browne
SSShawn P. Serbin
Shawn P. Serbin
Monitoring plant water stress and biomass is limited by labor intensive measurements techniques. Observing plant water conditions more broadly is now enabled by microwave remote sensing. Specifically, satellite-based vegetation optical depth (VOD) provides daily observations of vegetation water volume at tens of kilometers. While satellite VOD has been used for many applications, VOD validations have rarely been carried out. A new method has enabled direct measurements of in-situ VOD, from Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). However, GNSS measurements have yet to be applied to more globally dominant grasslands and shrublands. Here, we explore how satellite-based VOD from SMAP and AMSR-2 compares with field-based microwave observations from 272 GNSS-based interferometric reflectometry (GNSS-IR) sites across the Western U.S as a part of the Plate Boundary Observatory (PBO) H20 network. These sensors measure a proxy for VOD at a scale of tens of meters, the normalized microwave reflectance index (NMRI). We find that satellite VOD generally positively correlates with GNSS NMRI with correlations between 0.2 to 0.6 across sites. These correlations increase to 0.3 to 0.7 when evaluating sites in regions with low spatial vegetation type heterogeneity, low tree cover, and large seasonal vegetation dynamics. The correlations are higher for X-band VOD, likely related to our finding that both X-band VOD and NMRI are both more sensitive to seasonal vegetation variations than C-band and L-band VOD products. These findings suggest that satellite VOD is capturing field-based GNSS signals in dryland ecosystems, and therefore that these sensors are a critical resource for validating satellite VOD at scale.