Joanne Arcand

Dr. Joanne Arcand

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2020 in Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDoreen M. Rabi
Doreen M. Rabi
KMKerry A. McBrien
Kerry A. McBrien
RSRuth Sapir-Pichhadze
Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
MNMeranda Nakhla
Meranda Nakhla
SASofia B. Ahmed
Sofia B. Ahmed
SDStella S. Daskalopoulou
Stella S. Daskalopoulou

1 May 2018 in Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KNKara A. Nerenberg
Kara A. Nerenberg
KZKelly B. Zarnke
Kelly B. Zarnke
Alexander K.C. LeungAlexander K.C. Leung
Alexander K.C. Leung
KDKaberi Dasgupta
Kaberi Dasgupta
SBSonia Butalia
Sonia Butalia
SDStella S. Daskalopoulou
Stella S. Daskalopoulou
Hypertension Canada provides annually updated, evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension in adults and children. This year, the adult and pediatric guidelines are combined in one document. The new 2018 pregnancy-specific hypertension guidelines are published separately. For 2018, 5 new guidelines are introduced, and 1 existing guideline on the blood pressure thresholds and targets in the setting of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke is revised. The use of validated wrist devices for the estimation of blood pressure in individuals with large arm circumference is now included. Guidance is provided for the follow-up measurements of blood pressure, with the use of standardized methods and electronic (oscillometric) upper arm devices in individuals with hypertension, and either ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or home blood pressure monitoring in individuals with white coat effect. We specify that all individuals with hypertension should have an assessment of global cardiovascular risk to promote health behaviours that lower blood pressure. Finally, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor combination should be used in place of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker in individuals with heart failure (with ejection fraction < 40%) who are symptomatic despite appropriate doses of guideline-directed heart failure therapies. The specific evidence and rationale underlying each of these guidelines are discussed.

7 November 2018 in The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDaniela Malta
Daniela Malta
KPKristina Petersen
Kristina Petersen
Claire JohnsonClaire Johnson
Claire Johnson
KTKathy Trieu
Kathy Trieu
SRSarah Rae
Sarah Rae
JAJoanne Arcand
Joanne Arcand
The purpose of this review was to identify, summarize, and critically appraise studies on dietary salt and health outcomes that were published from August 2016 to March 2017. The search strategy was adapted from a previous systematic review on dietary salt and health. Studies that meet standards for methodological quality criteria and eligible health outcomes are reported in detailed critical appraisals. Overall, 47 studies were identified and are summarized in this review. Two studies assessed all‐cause or disease‐specific mortality outcomes, eight studies assessed morbidity reduction‐related outcomes, three studies assessed outcomes related to symptoms/quality of life/functional status, 25 studies assessed blood pressure ( BP ) outcomes and other clinically relevant surrogate outcomes, and nine studies assessed physiologic surrogate outcomes. Eight of these studies met the criteria for outcomes and methodological quality and underwent detailed critical appraisals and commentary. Five of these studies found adverse effects of salt intake on health outcomes ( BP ; death due to kidney disease and initiation of dialysis; total kidney volume and composite of kidney function; composite of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) events including, and risk of mortality); one study reported the benefits of salt restriction in chronic BP and two studies reported neutral results ( BP and risk of CKD ). Overall, these articles confirm the negative effects of excessive sodium intake on health outcomes.

14 May 2019 in The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNorm Campbell
Norm Campbell
FHFeng J. He
Feng J. He
MTMonique Tan
Monique Tan
FCFrancesco P. Cappuccio
Francesco P. Cappuccio
Bruce NealBruce Neal
Bruce Neal
DLDaniel T. Lackland
Daniel T. Lackland
The International Consortium for Quality Research on Dietary Sodium/Salt (TRUE) is a coalition of intentional and national health and scientific organizations formed because of concerns low‐quality research methods were creating controversy regarding dietary salt reduction. One of the main sources of controversy is believed related to errors in estimating sodium intake with urine studies. The recommendations and positions in this manuscript were generated following a series of systematic reviews and analyses by experts in hypertension, nutrition, statistics, and dietary sodium. To assess the population's current 24‐hour dietary sodium ingestion, single complete 24‐hour urine samples, collected over a series of days from a representative population sample, were recommended. To accurately estimate usual dietary sodium at the individual level, at least 3 non‐consecutive complete 24‐hour urine collections obtained over a series of days that reflect the usual short‐term variations in dietary pattern were recommended. Multiple 24‐hour urine collections over several years were recommended to estimate an individual's usual long‐term sodium intake. The role of single spot or short duration timed urine collections in assessing population average sodium intake requires more research. Single or multiple spot or short duration timed urine collections are not recommended for assessing an individual's sodium intake especially in relationship to health outcomes. The recommendations should be applied by scientific review committees, granting agencies, editors and journal reviewers, investigators, policymakers, and those developing and creating dietary sodium recommendations. Low‐quality research on dietary sodium/salt should not be funded, conducted, or published.

1 February 2011 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JAJoanne Arcand
Joanne Arcand
JIJoan Ivanov
Joan Ivanov
ASAlexa Sasson
Alexa Sasson
VFVanessa Floras
Vanessa Floras
AAAbdul Al-Hesayen
Abdul Al-Hesayen
GNGary E Newton
Gary E Newton
Background: A low-sodium diet is an accepted treatment of patients with heart failure (HF), although minimal evidence exists on the appropriate amount of sodium intake for this population. Certain HF guidelines have liberalized dietary sodium recommendations, which actually exceed guidelines for healthy adults.

29 April 2019 in The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STSudhir raj Thout
Sudhir raj Thout
JSJoseph Alvin Santos
Joseph Alvin Santos
BMBriar McKenzie
Briar McKenzie
KTKathy Trieu
Kathy Trieu
Claire JohnsonClaire Johnson
Claire Johnson
Jacqui WebsterJacqui Webster
Jacqui Webster
The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2010 study estimated national salt intake for 187 countries based on data available up to 2010. The purpose of this review was to identify studies that have measured salt intake in a nationally representative population using the 24‐hour urine collection method since 2010, with a view to updating evidence on population salt intake globally. Studies published from January 2011 to September 2018 were searched for from MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases using relevant terms. Studies that provided nationally representative estimates of salt intake among the healthy adult population based on the 24‐hour urine collection were included. Measured salt intake was extracted and compared with the GBD estimates. Of the 115 identified studies assessed for eligibility, 13 studies were included: Four studies were from Europe, and one each from the United States, Canada, Benin, India, Samoa, Fiji, Barbados, Australia, and New Zealand. Mean daily salt intake ranged from 6.75 g/d in Barbados to 10.66 g/d in Portugal. Measured mean population salt intake in Italy, England, Canada, and Barbados was lower, and in Fiji, Samoa, and Benin was higher, in recent surveys compared to the GBD 2010 estimates. Despite global targets to reduce population salt intake, only 13 countries have published nationally representative salt intake data since the GBD 2010 study. In all countries, salt intake levels remain higher than the World Health Organization's recommendation, highlighting the need for additional global efforts to lower salt intake and monitor salt reduction strategies.