Marwa Harras

Dr. Marwa Harras

pharmaceutical chemistry department, faculty of pharmacy, Al-Azhar University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2020 in Bioorganic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TFThoraya Farghaly
Thoraya Farghaly
GMGhada S. Masaret
Ghada S. Masaret
ZMZeinab A. Muhammad
Zeinab A. Muhammad
MHMarwa Harras
Marwa Harras

1 June 2019 in Medicinal Chemistry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EFEman Fayed
Eman Fayed
RSRehab Sabour
Rehab Sabour
MHMarwa Harras
Marwa Harras
AMAhmed B. M. Mehany
Ahmed B. M. Mehany

1 December 2021 in Bioorganic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASamar J. Almehmadi
Samar J. Almehmadi
AAAmani M.R. Alsaedi
Amani M.R. Alsaedi
MHMarwa Harras
Marwa Harras
TFThoraya Farghaly
Thoraya Farghaly

1 January 2020 in Bioorganic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MIMagda M.F. Ismail
Magda M.F. Ismail
AFAmel M. Farrag
Amel M. Farrag
MHMarwa Harras
Marwa Harras
Mona H IbrahimMona H Ibrahim
Mona H Ibrahim
AMAhmed B.M. Mehany
Ahmed B.M. Mehany


22 July 2019 in MedChemComm
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMarwa Harras
Marwa Harras
RSRehab Sabour
Rehab Sabour
OAOmkulthom Mohamed Alkamali
Omkulthom Mohamed Alkamali
Herein, the design and synthesis of some novel 1,3,4-trisubstituted pyrazole derivatives was carried out through the structural modification of lonazolac. All the synthesized compounds were investigated for in vitro COX-1 & COX-2 inhibition and in vivo anti-inflammatory activity by a carrageenan rat paw edema model. Among them, the chalcones 2a and 2b were the most COX-2 selective derivatives (S.I. = 8.22 and 9.31, respectively) and revealed very good in vivo anti-inflammatory potency. Similarly, the compounds 4a, 6b, 7a and 8a exhibited good COX-2 selectivity and in vivo anti-inflammatory activity. The active compounds were selected to further investigate their ulcerogenic activity, and they were found to be less ulcerogenic (ulcer indices = 2.4–8.4) as compared to indomethacin (ulcer index = 17.6) and nearly as ulcerogenic as celecoxib (ulcer index = 8.1). Moreover, histological studies were performed to evaluate the safety of these compounds on the stomach, liver and kidney. Furthermore, a docking study was performed to determine possible binding of the most active compounds 2a and 2b, which showed high docking scores (−9.461 and −7.962 kcal mol−1, respectively) that were comparable to that of celecoxib (−8.692 kcal mol−1).