Diana Mateus

Prof. Dr. Diana Mateus

Institut für Informatik, Technical University of Munich, 80333 München, Germany

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 October 2016
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
MSMartin Simonovsky
Martin Simonovsky
BGBenjamín Gutiérrez-Becker
Benjamín Gutiérrez-Becker
DMDiana Mateus
Diana Mateus
NNNassir Navab
Nassir Navab
NKNikos Komodakis
Nikos Komodakis

1 March 2012 in Image and Vision Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLoren Arthur Schwarz
Loren Arthur Schwarz
AMArtashes Mkhitaryan
Artashes Mkhitaryan
DMDiana Mateus
Diana Mateus
NNNassir Navab
Nassir Navab

19 December 2022 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AJAmelia Jiménez-Sánchez
Amelia Jiménez-Sánchez
MTMickael Tardy
Mickael Tardy
MBMiguel Ángel González Ballester
Miguel Ángel González Ballester
DMDiana Mateus
Diana Mateus
Gemma PiellaGemma Piella
Gemma Piella

1 January 2011
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
OPOlivier Pauly
Olivier Pauly
BGBen Glocker
Ben Glocker
ACAntonio Criminisi
Antonio Criminisi
DMDiana Mateus
Diana Mateus
AMAxel Martinez Möller
Axel Martinez Möller
NNNassir Navab
Nassir Navab

17 October 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
AJAmelia Jiménez-Sánchez
Amelia Jiménez-Sánchez
SAShadi Albarqouni
Shadi Albarqouni
DMDiana Mateus
Diana Mateus

2 September 2018 in Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJanis Renner
Janis Renner
HPHenrik Phlipsen
Henrik Phlipsen
BHBernhard Haller
Bernhard Haller
FNFernando Navarro-Avila
Fernando Navarro-Avila
YSYadira Saint-Hill-Febles
Yadira Saint-Hill-Febles
PKPeter Klare
Peter Klare
Background and aims: Clinical data suggest that the quality of optical diagnoses of colorectal polyps differs markedly among endoscopists. The aim of this study was to develop a computer program that was able to differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps using unmagnified endoscopic pictures. Methods: During colonoscopy procedures polyp photographies were performed using the unmagnified high-definition white light and narrow band image mode. All detected polyps (n = 275) were resected and sent to pathology. Histopathological diagnoses served as the ground truth. Machine learning was used in order to generate a computer-assisted optical biopsy (CAOB) approach. In the test phase pictures were presented to CAOB in order to obtain optical diagnoses. Altogether 788 pictures were available (602 for training the machine learning algorithm and 186 for CAOB testing). All test pictures were also presented to two experts in optical polyp characterization. The primary endpoint of the study was the accuracy of CAOB diagnoses in the test phase. Results: A total of 100 polyps (of these 52% neoplastic) were used in the CAOB test phase. The mean size of test polyps was 4 mm. Accuracy of the CAOB approach was 78.0%. Sensitivity and negative predictive value were 92.3% and 88.2%, respectively. Accuracy obtained by two expert endoscopists was 84.0% and 77.0%. Regarding accuracy of optical diagnoses CAOB predictions did not differ significantly compared to experts (p = .307 and p = 1.000, respectively). Conclusions: CAOB showed good accuracy on the basis of unmagnified endoscopic pictures. Performance of CAOB predictions did not differ significantly from experts’ decisions. The concept of computer assistance for colorectal polyp characterization needs to evolve towards a real-time application prior of being used in a broader set-up.