Alessandra Schiappacassa

Dr. Alessandra Schiappacassa


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 August 2019 in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAlessandra Schiappacassa
Alessandra Schiappacassa
PMPriscila Maranhão
Priscila Maranhão
MSMaria das Graças Coelho de Souza
Maria das Graças Coelho de Souza
DPDiogo G. Panazzolo
Diogo G. Panazzolo
JNJosé Firmino Nogueira Neto
José Firmino Nogueira Neto
Luiz G. Kraemer-AguiarLuiz G. Kraemer-Aguiar
Luiz G. Kraemer-Aguiar
Background: Obesity is the main risk factor for diabetes and excessive visceral fat triggers low-grade inflammatory process, mediated by activation and release of cytokines and high flow of free fatty acids that contribute to insulin resistance, increased oxidative stress, and impaired endothelial function. Metformin and vildagliptin have known vasculoprotective actions, but the value of these drugs on drug-naïve diabetic patients during 30 days use warrants investigation. Our purpose was to observe their effects on endothelial function, oxidative stress, inflammatory biomarkers, and plasma viscosity. Methods: 38 women with obesity and type 2 diabetes drug-naïve, aged between 19 and 50 years, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, were recruited and subjected to measurements of endothelial function, nutritive skin microvascular reactivity, plasma viscosity, inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers at baseline and randomized 1:1 to ingest metformin (850 mg twice/day) or vildagliptin (50 mg twice/day) during 30 days, and then, re-evaluated. Results: No differences between groups were noticed at baseline. After treatment, vildagliptin promoted an improvement on endothelial-dependent and -independent vasodilatations, at arteriole level, while metformin resulted in improved nutritive microvascular reactivity, at the capillary level. Intragroup analysis showed that vildagliptin reduced insulin, C-peptide and oxidized LDL, and increased adiponectin and glucagon-like peptide-1 while metformin reduced weight, plasma glucose, total cholesterol, HDL-c, LDL-c, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 activity, with an unexpected increase on tumor necrosis factor-α. No significant difference in plasma viscosity was noted. Conclusions: In the vascular beds investigated, both drugs used for only 30 days improved endothelial function, through distinct, and possibly, complementary mechanisms on drug-naïve diabetic women. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01827280

9 October 2020 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAlessandra Schiappacassa
Alessandra Schiappacassa
PMPriscila Maranhão
Priscila Maranhão
MSMaria das Graças Coelho de Souza
Maria das Graças Coelho de Souza
DPDiogo G. Panazzolo
Diogo G. Panazzolo
JNJosé Firmino Nogueira Neto
José Firmino Nogueira Neto
Luiz G. Kraemer-AguiarLuiz G. Kraemer-Aguiar
Luiz G. Kraemer-Aguiar
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity are both related to endothelial dysfunction. Postprandial lipemia is a cardiovascular risk. Notably, it is known that a high-fat diet may elicit microvascular dysfunction, even in healthy subjects. Since anti-diabetic drugs have different mechanisms of action and also distinct vascular benefits, we aimed to compare the results of two anti-diabetic drugs after the intake of a lipid-rich meal on microcirculation in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. In parallel, we also investigated the metabolic profile, oxidative stress, inflammation, plasma viscosity, and some gastrointestinal peptides. Subjects/Methods: We included 38 drug-naïve patients, all women aged between 19 and 50 years, with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. We performed endothelial measurements and collected samples before (fasting) and after the intake of a lipid-rich meal at 30, 60, 120, and 180 min. Patients were randomized to metformin or vildagliptin, given orally just before the meal. Endothelial function was assessed by videocapillaroscopy and laser-Doppler flowmetry to investigate microvascular reactivity. Besides, we also investigated plasma viscosity, inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers, gastrointestinal peptides, and metabolic profile in all time points. Results: No differences at baseline were noted between groups. Vildagliptin increased glucagon-like peptide-1 compared to metformin. Paired comparisons showed that, during the postprandial period, vildagliptin significantly changed levels of insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1, and also the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 activity, while metformin had effects on plasma glucose solely. Metformin use during the test meal promoted an increase in functional capillary density, while vildagliptin kept non-nutritive microvascular blood flow and vasomotion unchanged. Conclusions: After the intake of a lipid-rich meal, the use of vildagliptin preserved postprandial non-nutritive microflow and vasomotion, while metformin increased capillary recruitment, suggesting protective and different mechanisms of action on microcirculation.