Platelets are critical components of a number of physiologic processes, including tissue remodeling after injury, wound healing, and maintenance of vascular integrity. Increasing evidence suggests that platelets may also play important roles in cancer. In ovarian cancer, thrombocytosis, both at the time of initial diagnosis and at recurrence, has been associated with poorer prognosis. This review describes current evidence for associations between thrombocytosis and ovarian cancer prognosis and discusses the clinical relevance of platelet count thresholds and timing of assessment. In addition, we discuss several mechanisms from in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies that may underlie these associations and recommend potential approaches for novel therapeutic targets for this lethal disease.

Background: NCCN recommends evaluation and treatment of all patients with cancer who have anemia. Few studies have evaluated the prevalence of anemia among patients with gynecologic cancer and compliance with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Hematopoietic Growth Factors. Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with primary gynecologic cancer between 2008 and 2018. We identified tumor registry–confirmed patients using ICD-O codes from the Synthetic Derivative database, a deidentified copy of Vanderbilt’s electronic medical records. Patients were included if they were between ages 18 and 89 years, received initial care at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and had a hemoglobin measurement within the first 6 months of diagnosis. Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin level ≤11 g/dL and was graded using CTCAE version 5.0. Results: A total of 939 patients met inclusion criteria, with a median age of 60 years. The most common malignancy was uterine cancer. At the time of cancer diagnosis, 186 patients (20%) were noted to have anemia. Within 6 months of diagnosis, 625 patients (67%) had anemia, of whom 200 (32%) had grade 3 anemia and 209 (33%) underwent any evaluation of anemia, including 80 (38%) with iron studies performed. Of the patients with iron studies performed, 7 (9%) had absolute iron deficiency and 7 (9%) had possible functional iron deficiency. Among those with anemia within 6 months of diagnosis, 260 (42%) received treatment for anemia, including blood transfusion (n=205; 79%), oral iron (n=57; 22%), intravenous iron (n=8; 3%), vitamin B₁₂ (n=37; 14%), and folate supplementation (n=7; 3%). Patients with ovarian cancer were significantly more likely to have anemia and undergo evaluation and treatment of anemia. Conclusions: Anemia is pervasive among patients with gynecologic cancer, but compliance with the NCCN Guidelines is low. Our data suggest that there are opportunities for improvement in the evaluation and management of anemia.

Background: While excess adiposity is positively associated with ovarian cancer risk, the relationship with patient prognosis remains to be fully elucidated, especially with regard to changes over time during survivorship. Methods: We assembled a retrospective cohort of tumor registry confirmed ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer cases and evaluated peri- and post-diagnosis (±30 days and up to 5 years after, respectively) body mass index (BMI) from electronic medical records (EMR) from the Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Associations with overall survival (OS) were quantified by Hazards Ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from Cox proportional hazards regression; multivariable adjustment included age, stage, grade, histologic subtype, treatment, race, and year of diagnosis. Results: We evaluated 13,676 peri- and post-diagnosis BMI observations for 616 predominantly Caucasian (87.0%) cases; the majority had serous histology (62.5%), advanced stage (58.1% Stage III or IV), high grade (52.4% poorly or undifferentiated) disease. Compared to peri-diagnosis (median =29.0), BMI was lowest 6 months post-diagnosis (median=27.4) and then gradually increased over time among survivors. In multivariable adjusted models, each 5-unit increase in mean peri-diagnosis BMI corresponded with a nonsignificant increase (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97-1.18) while higher mean post-diagnosis BMI corresponded to a significantly decreased risk of death (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.84-1.00). Adjusted models that incorporated all peri- and post-diagnosis BMI observations evaluated indicated that each 5-unit increase in BMI was associated with a 15% reduced risk of death (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.94). Conclusions: Whereas lower adiposity may be beneficial in terms of risk, higher adiposity appears to benefit ovarian cancer survival. Factors including cancer cachexia, weight loss among ill patients, and weight gain among survivors may contribute to this seemingly protective association. Additional research to disentangle the influence of BMI on ovarian cancer outcomes and inform adiposity guidance for ovarian cancer survivors is needed. Citation Format: Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel, Sharon Phillips, George Bukenya, Pranoti Pradhan, Sara Duque, Nneka Anyanwu, Deok-Soo Son, Andrew J. Wilson, Demetra H. Hufnagel, Marta A. Crispens. Body mass index and ovarian cancer: Changes after diagnosis and associations with overall survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3228.