Gianni Francesco Guidetti

Dr. Gianni Francesco Guidetti

Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Biology and Biotechnology “L. Spallanzani”, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MZMarta Zarà
Marta Zarà
GGGianni Francesco Guidetti
Gianni Francesco Guidetti
MCMarina Camera
Marina Camera
ICIlaria Canobbio
Ilaria Canobbio
PAPatrizia Amadio
Patrizia Amadio
Silvia Stella BarbieriSilvia Stella Barbieri
Silvia Stella Barbieri
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are well-established mediators of cell-to-cell communication. EVs can be released by every cell type and they can be classified into three major groups according to their biogenesis, dimension, density, and predominant protein markers: exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies. During their formation, EVs associate with specific cargo from their parental cell that can include RNAs, free fatty acids, surface receptors, and proteins. The biological function of EVs is to maintain cellular and tissue homeostasis by transferring critical biological cargos to distal or neighboring recipient cells. On the other hand, their role in intercellular communication may also contribute to the pathogenesis of several diseases, including thrombosis. More recently, their physiological and biochemical properties have suggested their use as a therapeutic tool in tissue regeneration as well as a novel option for drug delivery. In this review, we will summarize the impact of EVs released from blood and vascular cells in arterial and venous thrombosis, describing the mechanisms by which EVs affect thrombosis and their potential clinical applications.

1 January 2021 in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMauro Vismara
Mauro Vismara
MZMarta Zarà
Marta Zarà
SNSharon Negri
Sharon Negri
JCJessica Canino
Jessica Canino
ICIlaria Canobbio
Ilaria Canobbio
GGGianni Francesco Guidetti
Gianni Francesco Guidetti

1 November 2012 in Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGianni Francesco Guidetti
Gianni Francesco Guidetti
ACAlessandra Consonni
Alessandra Consonni
LCLina Cipolla
Lina Cipolla
Piercarlo MustarelliPiercarlo Mustarelli
Piercarlo Mustarelli
CBCesare Balduini
Cesare Balduini
MTMauro Torti
Mauro Torti

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STSilvia M. G. Trivigno
Silvia M. G. Trivigno
GGGianni Francesco Guidetti
Gianni Francesco Guidetti
Silvia Stella BarbieriSilvia Stella Barbieri
Silvia Stella Barbieri
MZMarta Zarà
Marta Zarà
Platelets are classically recognized for their important role in hemostasis and thrombosis but they are also involved in many other physiological and pathophysiological processes, including infection. Platelets are among the first cells recruited to sites of inflammation and infection and they exert their antimicrobial response actively cooperating with the immune system. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on platelet receptor interaction with different types of pathogens and the consequent modulations of innate and adaptive immune responses.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLuca Galgano
Luca Galgano
GGGianni Francesco Guidetti
Gianni Francesco Guidetti
MTMauro Torti
Mauro Torti
ICIlaria Canobbio
Ilaria Canobbio
Circulating platelets are responsible for hemostasis and thrombosis but are also primary sensors of pathogens and are involved in innate immunity, inflammation, and sepsis. Sepsis is commonly caused by an exaggerated immune response to bacterial, viral, and fungal infections, and leads to severe thrombotic complications. Among others, the endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) found in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is the most common trigger of sepsis. Since the discovery of the expression of the LPS receptor TLR4 in platelets, several studies have investigated the ability of LPS to induce platelet activation and to contribute to a prothrombotic phenotype, per se or in combination with plasma proteins and platelet agonists. This issue, however, is still controversial, as different sources, purity, and concentrations of LPS, different platelet-purification protocols, and different methods of analysis have been used in the past two decades, giving contradictory results. This review summarizes and critically analyzes past and recent publications about LPS-induced platelet activation in vitro. A methodological section illustrates the principal platelet preparation protocols and significant differences. The ability of various sources of LPS to elicit platelet activation in terms of aggregation, granule secretion, cytokine release, ROS production, and interaction with leukocytes and NET formation is discussed.

14 July 2017 in TH Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MZMarta Zarà
Marta Zarà
GGGianni Francesco Guidetti
Gianni Francesco Guidetti
DBDaniela Boselli
Daniela Boselli
CVChiara Villa
Chiara Villa
ICIlaria Canobbio
Ilaria Canobbio
MTMauro Torti
Mauro Torti
Circulating platelets and platelet-derived microparticles are regulators of cancer metastasis. In this study, we show that breast cancer cells induce platelet aggregation and lead to the release of platelet-derived microparticles. Although able to cause comparable aggregation, the highly aggressive MDA-MB-231 cells were more potent than the poorly aggressive MCF7 cells in inducing platelet-derived microparticles release, which was comparable to that promoted by thrombin. MDA-MB-231 cells were able to bind and internalize both MCF7- and MDA-MB-231-induced platelet-derived microparticles with comparable efficiency. By contrast, MCF7 cells did not interact with either type of platelet-derived microparticles. Upon internalization, only platelet-derived microparticles released by platelet stimulation with MDA-MB-231 cells, but not those released upon stimulation with MCF7 cells, caused activation of MDA-MB-231 cells and promoted the phosphorylation of selected signaling proteins, including p38MAPK and myosin light chain. Accordingly, MDA-MB-231-induced, but not MCF7-induced, platelet-derived microparticles dose-dependently stimulated migration and invasion of targeted MDA-MB-231 cells. These results identify a novel paracrine positive feedback mechanism initiated by aggressive breast cancer cell types to potentiate their invasive phenotype through the release of platelet-derived microparticles. * These authors contributed equally to this work.