Jim Thomson

Jim Thomson


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 April 2014 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JTJim Thomson
Jim Thomson
WRW. Erick Rogers
W. Erick Rogers
Ocean surface waves (sea and swell) are generated by winds blowing over a distance (fetch) for a duration of time. In the Arctic Ocean, fetch varies seasonally from essentially zero in winter to hundreds of kilometers in recent summers. Using in situ observations of waves in the central Beaufort Sea, combined with a numerical wave model and satellite sea ice observations, we show that wave energy scales with fetch throughout the seasonal ice cycle. Furthermore, we show that the increased open water of 2012 allowed waves to develop beyond pure wind seas and evolve into swells. The swells remain tied to the available fetch, however, because fetch is a proxy for the basin size in which the wave evolution occurs. Thus, both sea and swell depend on the open water fetch in the Arctic, because the swell is regionally driven. This suggests that further reductions in seasonal ice cover in the future will result in larger waves, which in turn provide a mechanism to break up sea ice and accelerate ice retreat.

15 May 2012 in IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJim Thomson
Jim Thomson
BPBrian Polagye
Brian Polagye
VDVibhav Durgesh
Vibhav Durgesh
MRMarshall Richmond
Marshall Richmond
Field measurements of turbulence are presented from two sites in Puget Sound, WA, that are proposed for electrical power generation using tidal current turbines. Time series data from multiple acoustic Doppler instruments are analyzed to obtain statistical measures of fluctuations in both the magnitude and direction of the tidal currents. The resulting turbulence intensities (i.e., the turbulent velocity fluctuations normalized by the deterministic tidal currents) are typically 10% at the hub heights (i.e., the relevant depth) of the proposed turbines. Length and time scales of the turbulence are also analyzed. Large-scale, anisotropic eddies dominate the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) spectra, which may be the result of proximity to headlands at each site. At small scales, an isotropic turbulent cascade is observed and used to estimate the dissipation rate of TKE, which is shown to balance with shear production. Data quality and sampling parameters are discussed, with an emphasis on the removal of Doppler noise from turbulence statistics. The results are relevant to estimating the performance and fatigue of tidal turbines.

1 December 2012 in Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJim Thomson
Jim Thomson
Energy dissipation rates during ocean wave breaking are estimated from high-resolution profiles of turbulent velocities collected within 1 m of the surface. The velocity profiles are obtained from a pulse-coherent acoustic Doppler sonar on a wave-following platform, termed a Surface Wave Instrument Float with Tracking (SWIFT), and the dissipation rates are estimated from the structure function of the velocity profiles. The purpose of the SWIFT is to maintain a constant range to the time-varying surface and thereby observe the turbulence in breaking crests (i.e., above the mean still water level). The Lagrangian quality is also useful to prefilter wave orbital motions and mean currents from the velocity measurements, which are limited in magnitude by phase wrapping in the coherent Doppler processing. Field testing and examples from both offshore whitecaps and nearshore surf breaking are presented. Dissipation rates are elevated (up to 10−3 m2 s−3) during strong breaking conditions, which are confirmed using surface videos recorded on board SWIFT. Although some velocity contamination is present from platform tilting and heaving, the structure of the velocity profiles is dominated by a turbulent cascade of eddies (i.e., the inertial subrange). The noise, or uncertainty, in the dissipation estimates is shown to be normally distributed and uncorrelated with platform motion. Aggregated SWIFT measurements are shown to be useful in mapping wave-breaking dissipation in space and time.

16 April 2018 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JTJim Thomson
Jim Thomson
SAStephen Ackley
Stephen Ackley
FGFanny Girard‐Ardhuin
Fanny Girard‐Ardhuin
FAFabrice Ardhuin
Fabrice Ardhuin
ABAlexander Babanin
Alexander Babanin
Peter WadhamsPeter Wadhams
Peter Wadhams
A large collaborative program has studied the coupled air‐ice‐ocean‐wave processes occurring in the Arctic during the autumn ice advance. The program included a field campaign in the western Arctic during the autumn of 2015, with in situ data collection and both aerial and satellite remote sensing. Many of the analyses have focused on using and improving forecast models. Summarizing and synthesizing the results from a series of separate papers, the overall view is of an Arctic shifting to a more seasonal system. The dramatic increase in open water extent and duration in the autumn means that large surface waves and significant surface heat fluxes are now common. When refreezing finally does occur, it is a highly variable process in space and time. Wind and wave events drive episodic advances and retreats of the ice edge, with associated variations in sea ice formation types (e.g., pancakes, nilas). This variability becomes imprinted on the winter ice cover, which in turn affects the melt season the following year.

10 December 2013 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EDE. A. D'Asaro
E. A. D'Asaro
JTJim Thomson
Jim Thomson
ASA. Y. Shcherbina
A. Y. Shcherbina
RHR. R. Harcourt
R. R. Harcourt
MCM. F. Cronin
M. F. Cronin
BFB. Fox‐Kemper
B. Fox‐Kemper
Nearly all operational ocean models use air‐sea fluxes and the ocean shear and stratification to estimate upper ocean boundary layer mixing rates. This approach implicitly parameterizes surface wave effects in terms of these inputs. Here we test this assumption using parallel experiments in a lake with small waves and in the open ocean with much bigger waves. Under the same wind stress and adjusting for buoyancy flux, we find the mixed layer average turbulent vertical kinetic energy in the open ocean typically twice that in the lake. The increase is consistent with models of Langmuir turbulence, in which the wave Stokes drift, and not wave breaking, is the dominant mechanism by which waves energize turbulence in the mixed layer. Applying these same theories globally, we find enhanced mixing and deeper mixed layers resulting from the inclusion of Langmuir turbulence in the boundary layer parameterization, especially in the Southern Ocean.

3 November 2016 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WRW. Erick Rogers
W. Erick Rogers
JTJim Thomson
Jim Thomson
HSHayley H. Shen
Hayley H. Shen
MDMartin J. Doble
Martin J. Doble
PWPeter Wadhams
Peter Wadhams
SCSukun Cheng
Sukun Cheng