We analysed the serum C-reactive protein level, synovial fluid obtained by joint aspiration and five synovial biopsies from 145 knee replacements prior to revision to assess the value of these parameters in diagnosing late peri-prosthetic infection. Five further synovial biopsies were used for histological analysis. Samples were also obtained during the revision and incubated and analysed in an identical manner for 14 days. A total of 40 total knee replacements were found to be infected (prevalence 27.6%). The aspiration technique had a sensitivity of 72.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 58.7 to 86.3), a specificity of 95.2% (95% CI 91.2 to 99.2), a positive predictive value of 85.3% (95% CI 73.4 to 100), a negative predictive value of 90.1% (95% CI 84.5 to 95.7) and an accuracy of 89%. The biopsy technique had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 98.1% (95% CI 95.5 to 100), a positive predictive value of 95.2% (95% CI 88.8 to 100), a negative predictive value of 100% and an accuracy of 98.6%. C-reactive protein with a cut-off-point of 13.5 mg/l had a sensitivity of 72.5% (95% CI 58.7 to 86.3), a specificity of 80.9% (95% CI 73.4 to 88.4), a positive predictive value of 59.2% (95% CI 45.4 to 73.0), a negative predictive value of 88.5% (95% 81.0 to 96.0 CI) and an accuracy of 78.1%. We found that biopsy was superior to joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements.

Objective: To investigate the frequency of structural changes in the vastus medialis muscle in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.Methods: Specimens of vastus medialis muscle from 78 patients with end‐stage OA of the knee undergoing total joint arthroplasty were examined histopathologically. Morphologic changes were assessed in relation to clinical features that might have contributed to muscle injury.Results: All muscle specimens exhibited atrophy of type 2 fibers. In 32% of the patients, atrophy of type 1 fibers was also noted. Fiber type grouping of type 1 fiber in 15% of the patients and type 2 fiber in 37%, indicating reinnervation, led to the diagnosis of neurogenic muscular atrophy in 32% of the patients; selective atrophy of type 2 fiber in 68% of the specimens was interpreted as possibly resulting from pain‐associated disuse. Signs of muscle degeneration and regeneration were found in 65% and 96% of the samples, respectively. Soft tissue changes indicating long‐term disease, such as calcification, fibrosis, and lipomatosis, were frequently observed (in 69%, 71%, and 94% of the patients, respectively). Statistical analysis of clinical and morphologic parameters revealed a significant association between degenerative muscle changes and the presence of a varus deviation of the leg axis.Conclusion: Patients with OA of the knee frequently exhibit muscle changes, with probable multifactorial etiology. Selective atrophy of type 2 fibers might reflect pain‐related immobilization of a limb. Changes such as neurogenic muscular atrophy, muscle fiber degeneration, and regeneration might contribute as cofactors in the development or progression of OA.

Ue surrounding the spacer 6 weeks after implantation and whether the concentration is higher than the minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) previously determined for pathogens that are responsible for most periprosthetic infections. Methods We removed 14 spacers used in two-stage septic revisions of infected hip prostheses 6 weeks after the primary implantations and determined the concentration of the antibiotics in the membrane formed between the spacer and the neighboring bone on the acetabular and the femoral sides. In seven cases Copal cement with gentamicin and clindamycin were used, and in seven other cases vancomycin was added to the Copal cement. Concentrations of the spacer antibiotics in the neighboring tissue were determined by tandem mass spectroscopy. Results All three antibiotics were detected in concentrations higher than their MIC. There were no differences between the groups regardless whether vancomycin was added to the cement, or whether the cement was applied with the acetabular cup spacer or with the stem spacer. Conclusions We concluded that, using the spacer technique described in this study, 6 weeks after spacer implantation, the concentrations of antibiotic are sufficient to treat a periprosthetic infection....

The role of the synovial biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip has not been clearly defined. We asked whether the value of a biopsy for a PJI is greater than that of aspiration and C-reactive protein (CRP). Before revision in 100 hip endoprostheses, we obtained CRP values, aspirated the joint, and obtained five synovial biopsy samples for bacteriologic analysis and five for histologic analysis. Microbiologic and histologic analyses of the periprosthetic tissue during revision surgery were used to verify the results of the preoperative diagnostic methods. The minimum followup was 24 months (median 32; range, 24–47 months). Forty-five of the 100 prostheses were identified as infected. The biopsy, with a combination of the bacteriologic and histologic examinations, showed the greatest diagnostic value of all the diagnostic procedures and led to a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI, ± 11%), specificity of 98% (95% CI, ± 4%), positive predictive value of 97% (95% CI, ± 5%), negative predictive value of 87% (95% CI, ± 8.3%), and accuracy of 91%. The biopsy technique has a greater value than aspiration and CRP in the diagnosis of PJI of the hip (Masri et al. J Arthroplasty 22:72–78, 2007). In patients with a negative aspirate, but increased CRP or clinical signs of infection, we regard biopsy to be preferable to just repeating the aspiration. Level II prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cementless two-stage revision of infected total hip prostheses lacks the possibility of local antibiotic protection of the implant at the time of reimplantation, which leads to the concern that this protocol may not sufficiently eradicate periprosthetic infection. Moreover, early implant loosening as much as 18% and stem subsidence as much as 30% have been reported. To determine whether a cementless revision could eradicate infection and achieve sufficient implant stability, we prospectively followed 36 patients with two-stage revisions for septic hip prostheses. We used a uniform protocol of a 6-week spacer interval, specific local and systemic antibiotic therapies, and cementless modular revision stems. The minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 35 months; range, 24–60 months). In one patient, the spacer was changed when the C-reactive protein value failed to normalize after 6 weeks, and the reimplantation was performed after an additional 6 weeks. No infections recurred. There was no implant loosening and a 94% bone-ingrowth fixation of stems. Subsidence occurred in two patients. The Harris hip score increased from a preoperative mean of 41 to 90 at 12 months after reimplantation and later. Using cementless prostheses in two-stage revisions of periprosthetic infections of the hip in combination with a specific local and systemic antibiotic therapy seems to eradicate infection and provide implant stability. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most frequent reasons for painful shoulder arthroplasties and revision surgery of shoulder arthroplasties. Cutibacterium acnes (Propionibacterium acnes) is one of the microorganisms that most often causes the infection. However, this slow growing microorganism is difficult to detect. This paper presents an overview of different diagnostic test to detect a periprosthetic shoulder infection. This includes nonspecific diagnostic tests and specific tests (with identifying the responsible microorganism). The aspiration can combine different specific and nonspecific tests. In dry aspiration and suspected joint infection, we recommend a biopsy. Several therapeutic options exist for the treatment of PJI of shoulder arthroplasties. In acute infections, the options include leaving the implant in place with open debridement, septic irrigation with antibacterial fluids like octenidine or polyhexanide solution, and exchange of all removable components. In late infections (more than four weeks after implantation) the therapeutic options are a permanent spacer, single-stage revision, and two-stage revision with a temporary spacer. The functional results are best after single-stage revisions with a success rate similar to two-stage revisions. For single-stage revisions, the microorganism should be known preoperatively so that specific antibiotics can be mixed into the cement for implantation of the new prosthesis and specific systemic antibiotic therapy can be applied to support the surgery.