Meindert Lamers

Dr. Meindert Lamers

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 October 2015 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RFRafael Fernandez-Leiro
Rafael Fernandez-Leiro
JCJulian Conrad
Julian Conrad
SSSjors Hw Scheres
Sjors Hw Scheres
MLMeindert Lamers
Meindert Lamers
The replicative DNA polymerase PolIIIα from Escherichia coli is a uniquely fast and processive enzyme. For its activity it relies on the DNA sliding clamp β, the proofreading exonuclease ε and the C-terminal domain of the clamp loader subunit τ. Due to the dynamic nature of the four-protein complex it has long been refractory to structural characterization. Here we present the 8 Å resolution cryo-electron microscopy structures of DNA-bound and DNA-free states of the PolIII-clamp-exonuclease-τc complex. The structures show how the polymerase is tethered to the DNA through multiple contacts with the clamp and exonuclease. A novel contact between the polymerase and clamp is made in the DNA bound state, facilitated by a large movement of the polymerase tail domain and τc. These structures provide crucial insights into the organization of the catalytic core of the replisome and form an important step towards determining the structure of the complete holoenzyme.

23 October 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TDThomas Dodd
Thomas Dodd
MBMargherita Botto
Margherita Botto
FPFabian Paul
Fabian Paul
RFRafael Fernandez-Leiro
Rafael Fernandez-Leiro
MLMeindert Lamers
Meindert Lamers
IIIvaylo Ivanov
Ivaylo Ivanov
Proofreading by replicative DNA polymerases is a fundamental mechanism ensuring DNA replication fidelity. In proofreading, mis-incorporated nucleotides are excised through the 3′-5′ exonuclease activity of the DNA polymerase holoenzyme. The exonuclease site is distal from the polymerization site, imposing stringent structural and kinetic requirements for efficient primer strand transfer. Yet, the molecular mechanism of this transfer is not known. Here we employ molecular simulations using recent cryo-EM structures and biochemical analyses to delineate an optimal free energy path connecting the polymerization and exonuclease states of E. coli replicative DNA polymerase Pol III. We identify structures for all intermediates, in which the transitioning primer strand is stabilized by conserved Pol III residues along the fingers, thumb and exonuclease domains. We demonstrate switching kinetics on a tens of milliseconds timescale and unveil a complete pol-to-exo switching mechanism, validated by targeted mutational experiments.

20 April 2015 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJeremy M Rock
Jeremy M Rock
ULUlla F Lang
Ulla F Lang
MCMichael R Chase
Michael R Chase
CFChristopher B Ford
Christopher B Ford
EGElias R Gerrick
Elias R Gerrick
MLMeindert Lamers
Meindert Lamers
Sarah Fortune, Meindert Lamers and colleagues show that, unlike Escherichia coli, Mycobacterium tuberculosis uses an exonuclease domain in polymerase DnaE1 to proofread DNA replication. Importantly, this proofreading mechanism renders mycobacteria sensitive to nucleoside analogs, a class of small molecules used to treat viral infections and cancer. The DNA replication machinery is an important target for antibiotic development in increasingly drug-resistant bacteria, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis1. Although blocking DNA replication leads to cell death, disrupting the processes used to ensure replication fidelity can accelerate mutation and the evolution of drug resistance. In Escherichia coli, the proofreading subunit of the replisome, the ɛ exonuclease, is essential for high-fidelity DNA replication2; however, we find that the corresponding subunit is completely dispensable in M. tuberculosis. Rather, the mycobacterial replicative polymerase DnaE1 itself encodes an editing function that proofreads DNA replication, mediated by an intrinsic 3′–5′ exonuclease activity within its PHP domain. Inactivation of the DnaE1 PHP domain increases the mutation rate by more than 3,000-fold. Moreover, phylogenetic analysis of DNA replication proofreading in the bacterial kingdom suggests that E. coli is a phylogenetic outlier and that PHP domain–mediated proofreading is widely conserved and indeed may be the ancestral prokaryotic proofreader.

9 January 2017 in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RFRafael Fernandez-Leiro
Rafael Fernandez-Leiro
JCJulian Conrad
Julian Conrad
JYJi-Chun Yang
Ji-Chun Yang
SFStefan M V Freund
Stefan M V Freund
SSSjors H W Scheres
Sjors H W Scheres
MLMeindert Lamers
Meindert Lamers

2 April 2013 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAna Toste Rêgo
Ana Toste Rêgo
AHAndrew N Holding
Andrew N Holding
HKHelen Kent
Helen Kent
MLMeindert Lamers
Meindert Lamers
DNA polymerase III (Pol III) is the catalytic α subunit of the bacterial DNA Polymerase III holoenzyme. To reach maximum activity, Pol III binds to the DNA sliding clamp β and the exonuclease ε that provide processivity and proofreading, respectively. Here, we characterize the architecture of the Pol III–clamp–exonuclease complex by chemical crosslinking combined with mass spectrometry and biochemical methods, providing the first structural view of the trimeric complex. Our analysis reveals that the exonuclease is sandwiched between the polymerase and clamp and enhances the binding between the two proteins by providing a second, indirect, interaction between the polymerase and clamp. In addition, we show that the exonuclease binds the clamp via the canonical binding pocket and thus prevents binding of the translesion DNA polymerase IV to the clamp, providing a novel insight into the mechanism by which the replication machinery can switch between replication, proofreading, and translesion synthesis.

10 March 2017 in Microbiology Spectrum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZDZanele Ditse
Zanele Ditse
MLMeindert Lamers
Meindert Lamers
DWDigby Warner
Digby Warner
Faithful replication and maintenance of the genome are essential to the ability of any organism to survive and propagate. For an obligate pathogen such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis that has to complete successive cycles of transmission, infection, and disease in order to retain a foothold in the human population, this requires that genome replication and maintenance must be accomplished under the metabolic, immune, and antibiotic stresses encountered during passage through variable host environments. Comparative genomic analyses have established that chromosomal mutations enable M. tuberculosis to adapt to these stresses: the emergence of drug-resistant isolates provides direct evidence of this capacity, so too the well-documented genetic diversity among M. tuberculosis lineages across geographic loci, as well as the microvariation within individual patients that is increasingly observed as whole-genome sequencing methodologies are applied to clinical samples and tuberculosis (TB) disease models. However, the precise mutagenic mechanisms responsible for M. tuberculosis evolution and adaptation are poorly understood. Here, we summarize current knowledge of the machinery responsible for DNA replication in M. tuberculosis , and discuss the potential contribution of the expanded complement of mycobacterial DNA polymerases to mutagenesis. We also consider briefly the possible role of DNA replication—in particular, its regulation and coordination with cell division—in the ability of M. tuberculosis to withstand antibacterial stresses, including host immune effectors and antibiotics, through the generation at the population level of a tolerant state, or through the formation of a subpopulation of persister bacilli—both of which might be relevant to the emergence and fixation of genetic drug resistance.