Mateusz Kucharczyk

Dr. Mateusz Kucharczyk

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2015 in Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMNatalia Malek
Natalia Malek
APAgnieszka Pajak
Agnieszka Pajak
NKNatalia Kolosowska
Natalia Kolosowska
MKMateusz Kucharczyk
Mateusz Kucharczyk
Katarzyna StarowiczKatarzyna Starowicz
Katarzyna Starowicz

1 June 2015 in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JDJan Detka
Jan Detka
AKA. Kurek
A. Kurek
MKMateusz Kucharczyk
Mateusz Kucharczyk
KGKatarzyna Głombik
Katarzyna Głombik
ABAgnieszka Basta-Kaim
Agnieszka Basta-Kaim
BBBoguslawa Budziszewska
Boguslawa Budziszewska

11 May 2018 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RJRobin Jonas
Robin Jonas
BNBarbara Namer
Barbara Namer
LSLenka Stockinger
Lenka Stockinger
KCKim Chisholm
Kim Chisholm
MSMark Schnakenberg
Mark Schnakenberg
RRRoman Rukwied
Roman Rukwied

29 April 2020 in European journal of pain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTatum M. Cummins
Tatum M. Cummins
MKMateusz Kucharczyk
Mateusz Kucharczyk
TGThomas Graven‐Nielsen
Thomas Graven‐Nielsen
Kirsty BannisterKirsty Bannister
Kirsty Bannister
Background: Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) as measured in rat and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), the supposed psychophysical paradigm of DNIC measured in humans, are unique manifestations of an endogenous descending modulatory pathway that is activated by the application of a noxious conditioning stimulus. The predictive value of the human CPM processing is crucial when deliberating the translational worth of the two phenomena.Methods: For CPM or DNIC measurement, test and conditioning stimuli were delivered using a computer‐controlled cuff algometry system or manual inflation of neonate blood pressure cuffs, respectively. In humans (n = 20), cuff pain intensity (for pain detection and pain tolerance thresholds) was measured using an electronic visual analogue scale. In isoflurane‐anaesthetized naïve rats, nociception was measured by recording deep dorsal horn wide dynamic range (WDR) neuronal firing rates (n = 7) using in vivo electrophysiology.Results: A painful cuff‐pressure conditioning stimulus on the leg increased pain detection and pain tolerance thresholds recorded by cuff stimulation on the contralateral leg in humans by 32% ± 3% and 24% ± 2% (mean ± SEM) of baseline responses, respectively (p < .001). This finding was back‐translated by revealing that a comparable cuff‐pressure conditioning stimulus (40 kPa) on the hind paw inhibited the responses of WDR neurons to noxious contralateral cuff test stimulation to 42% ± 9% of the baseline neuronal response (p = .003).Conclusions: These data substantiate that the noxious cuff pressure paradigm activates the descending pain modulatory system in rodent (DNIC) and man (CPM), respectively. Future back and forward translational studies using cuff pressure algometry may reveal novel mechanisms in varied chronic pain states.Significance: This study provides novel evidence that a comparable noxious cuff pressure paradigm activates a unique form of endogenous inhibitory control in healthy rat and man. This has important implications for the forward translation of bench and experimental pain research findings to the clinical domain. If translatable mechanisms underlying dysfunctional endogenous inhibitory descending pathway expression (previously evidenced in painful states in rat and man) were revealed using cuff pressure algometry, the identification of new analgesic targets could be expedited.

23 May 2017 in Pain and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Kirsty BannisterKirsty Bannister
Kirsty Bannister
MKMateusz Kucharczyk
Mateusz Kucharczyk
ADAnthony H. Dickenson
Anthony H. Dickenson
Here we aim to present an accessible review of the pharmacological targets for pain management, and succinctly discuss the newest trends in pain therapy. A key task for current pain pharmacotherapy is the identification of receptors and channels orchestrating nociception. Notwithstanding peripheral alterations in the receptors and channels following pathophysiological events, the modulatory mechanisms in the central nervous system are also fundamental to the regulation of pain perception. Bridging preclinical and clinical studies of peripheral and central components of pain modulation, we present the different types of pain and relate these to pharmacological interventions. We firstly highlight the roles of several peripheral nociceptors, such as NGF, CGRP, sodium channels, and TRP-family channels that may become novel targets for therapies. In the central nervous system, the roles of calcium channels and gabapentinoids as well as NMDA receptors in generating excitability are covered including ideas on central sensitization. We then turn to central modulatory systems and discuss opioids and monoamines. We aim to explain the importance of central sensitization and the dialogue of the spinal circuits with the brain descending modulatory controls before discussing a mechanism-based effectiveness of antidepressants in pain therapy and their potential to modulate the descending controls. Emphasizing the roles of conditioned pain modulation and its animal’s equivalent, diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, we discuss these unique descending modulations as a potential tool for understanding mechanisms in patients suffering from pain. Mechanism-based therapy is the key to picking the correct treatments and recent clinical studies using sensory symptoms of patients as surrogates for underlying mechanisms can be used to subgroup patients and reveal actions of drugs that may be lost when studying heterogenous groups of patients. Key advances in the understanding of basic pain principles will impact our thinking about therapy targets. The complexity of pain syndromes will require tailored pharmacological drugs, often in combination or through drugs with more than one action, and often psychotherapy, to fully control pain.

4 March 2022 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMateusz Kucharczyk
Mateusz Kucharczyk
FDFrancesca Di Domenico
Francesca Di Domenico
KBKirsty Bannister
Kirsty Bannister
Brainstem to spinal cord noradrenergic pathways include a locus coeruleus origin projection and diffuse noxious inhibitory controls. While both pathways are traditionally viewed as exerting an inhibitory effect on spinal neuronal activity, the locus coeruleus was previously shown to have a facilitatory influence on thermal nocioception according to the subpopulation of coerulean neurons activated. Coupled with knowledge of its functional modular organisation and the fact that diffuse noxious inhibitory controls are not expressed in varied animal models of chronicity, we hypothesized a regulatory role for the locus coeruleus on non-coerulean, discrete noradrenergic cell group(s). We implemented locus coeruleus targeting strategies by microinjecting canine adenovirus encoding for channelrhodopsin-2 under a noradrenaline-specific promoter in the spinal cord (retrogradely labelling a coeruleospinal module) or the locus coeruleus itself (labelling the entire coerulean module). Coeruleospinal module optoactivation abolished diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (two-way ANOVA, P < 0.0001), which were still expressed following locus coeruleus neuronal ablation. We propose that the cerulean system interacts with, but does not directly govern, diffuse noxious inhibitory controls. This mechanism may underlie the role of the locus coeruleus as a ‘chronic pain generator’. Pinpointing the functionality of discrete top-down pathways is crucial for understanding sensorimotor modulation in health and disease.