Explore full metrics on Scilit
(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)
<mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>H2(ω,ω) show differences in shape, which substantiate the availability of the theoretical prerequisites for model discrimination. A detailed parametric study for all four model variants has been performed. The results show that the basic features of the shapes of the <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>H2(ω,ω) amplitude spectra corresponding to the four models remain unique. The ubiquitousness of the qualitative differences between the competing models, for the whole set of parameters chosen for our analysis, suggests that the aforementioned amplitude spectra contain sufficient information for an unequivocal model discrimination.No biography provided yet