Antonio Chirumbolo

Prof. Antonio Chirumbolo

Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2016 in Psicothema
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMara Morelli
Mara Morelli
Dora BianchiDora Bianchi
Dora Bianchi
RBRoberto Baiocco
Roberto Baiocco
LPLina Pezzuti
Lina Pezzuti
ACAntonio Chirumbolo
Antonio Chirumbolo
Sexting is the exchange of sexually explicit or provocative content (text messages, photos, and videos) via smartphone, Internet, or social networks. Recent evidence enlightened its relationships with several risk and aggressive behaviors. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the amount of sexting, psychological distress, and dating violence in adolescents and young adults. The study involved 1,334 participants (68% females; mean age = 20.8) who completed a survey containing Kinsey Scale, Sexting Behavior Questionnaire, Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory, and General Health Questionnaire. Results showed gender and sexual orientation differences: Males (vs. females) did more sexting, while non-heterosexuals (vs. heterosexuals) were more involved in sexting. Moreover, high/moderate users of sexting committed more offline and online dating violence. Regarding psychological distress, no differences were found between high and low/moderate users of sexting. Results suggested that moderate and high use of sexting could be a risk factor for some problematic behaviors such as dating violence, even if there is not a relationship with anxiety and depression symptoms.

10 December 2019 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMaria Luisa Farnese
Maria Luisa Farnese
BBBarbieri Barbara
Barbieri Barbara
ACAntonio Chirumbolo
Antonio Chirumbolo
GPGerardo Patriotta
Gerardo Patriotta
Purpose: The SECI model (Nonaka, 1994) is the best-known conceptual framework for understanding knowledge generation processes in organizations. To date, however, empirical support for this framework has been overlooked. The present study aims to provide an evidence-based groundwork for the SECI model by testing a multidimensional questionnaire Knowledge Management SECI Processes Questionnaire (KMSP-Q) designed to capture the knowledge conversion modes theorized by Nonaka. Methodology: In a twofold study, the SECI model was operationalized via the KMSP-Q. Specifically, Study One tested its eight-dimensional structure through exploratory and confirmatory factorial analyses on 372 employees from different sectors. Study Two examined the construct validity and reliability by replicating the KMSP-Q factor structure in knowledge-intensive contexts (on a sample of 466 health-workers), and by investigating the unique impact of each dimension on some organizational outcomes (i.e., performance, innovativeness, collective efficacy). Findings: The overall findings highlighted that the KMSP-Q is a psychometrically robust questionnaire in terms of both dimensionality and construct validity, the different knowledge generation dimensions being specifically linked to different organizational outcomes. Research/Practical Implications: The KMSP-Q actualizes and provides empirical consistency to the theory underlying the SECI model. Moreover, it allows for the monitoring of an organization’s capability to manage new knowledge and detect the strengths/weaknesses of KM-related policies and programs. Originality/Value: This paper proposes a comprehensive measure of knowledge generation in work contexts, highlighting processes that organizations are likely to promote in order to improve their performance through the management of their knowledge resources.

1 May 2018 in Psychological Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSusanna Pallini
Susanna Pallini
ACAntonio Chirumbolo
Antonio Chirumbolo
MMMara Morelli
Mara Morelli
RBRoberto Baiocco
Roberto Baiocco
Fiorenzo LaghiFiorenzo Laghi
Fiorenzo Laghi
NENancy Eisenberg
Nancy Eisenberg
Secure attachment relationships have been described as having a regulatory function in regard to children's emotions, social cognition, and behavior. Although some theorists and researchers have argued that attachment affects children's self-regulation, most attachment theorists have not strongly emphasized this association. The goal of the current meta-analysis was to determine the magnitude of the relation between attachment security status and effortful control (EC)/top-down self-regulation in children up to 18 years of age. One hundred six papers met the inclusion criteria and 101 independent samples were used in analyses. When secure attachment status was compared with insecure attachment status, a significant relation (effect size [ES]) with EC favoring children with a secure attachment was found (100 studies; 20,350 participants; r = .20). A stronger relation was found when the same coder evaluated attachment than when the coder was different and when the measure of attachment was continuous; other moderators were not significant. Securely attached children were higher in EC than their avoidant (r = .10) or resistant (r = .17) counterparts. Children with organized attachments were higher in EC than those with disorganized attachments (r = .17), although this finding could be due to publication bias. For some comparisons of subgroups (B vs. A, B vs. C, and/or D vs. all others), moderation was found by source of information (higher ES for same reporter), age at assessment of EC and/or attachment (higher ES at older ages), method of attachment (lower ES for observational measures), time difference between assessments or research design (higher ESs for smaller time differences and concurrent findings), and published versus unpublished studies (higher ES for unpublished studies for A vs. B). (PsycINFO Database Record

1 September 2012 in European Journal of Personality
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PLPaul A. M. Van Lange
Paul A. M. Van Lange
RBRené Bekkers
René Bekkers
ACAntonio Chirumbolo
Antonio Chirumbolo
LLLuigi Leone
Luigi Leone

1 July 2010 in Personality and Individual Differences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAntonio Chirumbolo
Antonio Chirumbolo
LLLuigi Leone
Luigi Leone

1 June 2004 in European Journal of Personality
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAntonio Chirumbolo
Antonio Chirumbolo
SLStefano Livi
Stefano Livi
LMLucia Mannetti
Lucia Mannetti
APAntonio Pierro
Antonio Pierro
AKArie W. Kruglanski
Arie W. Kruglanski