Satyendra Kumar singh

Satyendra Kumar singh


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2008 in DNA Repair
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WWWenqi Wu
Wenqi Wu
MWMinli Wang
Minli Wang
WWWeizhong Wu
Weizhong Wu
SSSatyendra Kumar singh
Satyendra Kumar singh
TMTamara Mussfeldt
Tamara Mussfeldt
GIGeorge Iliakis
George Iliakis

29 April 2013 in Journal of Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSatyendra Kumar singh
Satyendra Kumar singh
CWCarrie A. Williams
Carrie A. Williams
KKKimberly Klarmann
Kimberly Klarmann
SBSandra S. Burkett
Sandra S. Burkett
JKJonathan R. Keller
Jonathan R. Keller
POPhilipp Oberdoerffer
Philipp Oberdoerffer
The (histone) deacetylase Sirt1 is a mediator of genomic and epigenetic maintenance, both of which are critical aspects of stem cell homeostasis and tightly linked to their functional decline in aging and disease. We show that Sirt1 ablation in adult hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) promotes aberrant HSPC expansion specifically under conditions of hematopoietic stress, which is associated with genomic instability as well as the accumulation of DNA damage and eventually results in a loss of long-term progenitors. We further demonstrate that progenitor cell expansion is mechanistically linked to the selective up-regulation of the HSPC maintenance factor and polycomb target gene Hoxa9. We show that Sirt1 binds to the Hoxa9 gene, counteracts acetylation of its histone target H4 lysine 16, and in turn promotes polycomb-specific repressive histone modification. Together, these findings demonstrate a dual role for Sirt1 in HSPC homeostasis, both via epigenetic regulation of a key developmental gene and by promoting genome stability in adult stem cells.

16 April 2020 in Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STShilpa Trivedi
Shilpa Trivedi
KSKamini Srivastava
Kamini Srivastava
AGAnurag Gupta
Anurag Gupta
TSTajindra Singh Saluja
Tajindra Singh Saluja
SKSumit Kumar
Sumit Kumar
SSSatyendra Kumar singh
Satyendra Kumar singh

1 August 2018 in Cell Stem Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSatyendra Kumar singh
Satyendra Kumar singh
SSShweta Singh
Shweta Singh
SGStephen Gadomski
Stephen Gadomski
LSLei Sun
Lei Sun
APAlexander Pfannenstein
Alexander Pfannenstein
JKJonathan R. Keller
Jonathan R. Keller

1 August 2007 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FWFrank Windhofer
Frank Windhofer
WWWenqi Wu
Wenqi Wu
MWMinli Wang
Minli Wang
SSSatyendra Kumar singh
Satyendra Kumar singh
JSJanapriya Saha
Janapriya Saha
GIGeorge Iliakis
George Iliakis

9 July 2011 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSatyendra Kumar singh
Satyendra Kumar singh
MWMinli Wang
Minli Wang
CSChristian Staudt
Christian Staudt
George IliakisGeorge Iliakis
George Iliakis
In cells exposed to ionizing radiation (IR), double-strand breaks (DSBs) form within clustered-damage sites from lesions disrupting the DNA sugar–phosphate backbone. It is commonly assumed that these DSBs form promptly and are immediately detected and processed by the cellular DNA damage response (DDR) apparatus. This assumption is questioned by the observation that after irradiation of naked DNA, a fraction of DSBs forms minutes to hours after exposure as a result of temperature dependent, chemical processing of labile sugar lesions. Excess DSBs also form when IR-exposed cells are processed at 50°C, but have been hitherto considered method-related artifact. Thus, it remains unknown whether DSBs actually develop in cells after IR exposure from chemically labile damage. Here, we show that irradiation of ‘naked’ or chromatin-organized mammalian DNA produces lesions, which evolve to DSBs and add to those promptly induced, after 8–24 h in vitro incubation at 37°C or 50°C. The conversion is more efficient in chromatin-associated DNA, completed within 1 h in cells and delayed in a reducing environment. We conclude that IR generates sugar lesions within clustered-damage sites contributing to DSB formation only after chemical processing, which occurs efficiently at 37°C. This subset of delayed DSBs may challenge DDR, may affect the perceived repair kinetics and requires further characterization.