Aman Ullah

Prof. Dr. Aman Ullah

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 August 2012 in Energy & Fuels
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HDHassan Dehghanpour
Hassan Dehghanpour
HZH. A. Zubair
H. A. Zubair
ACA. Chhabra
A. Chhabra
Aman UllahAman Ullah
Aman Ullah

1 January 2019 in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSShruti Sarode
Shruti Sarode
PUPunita Upadhyay
Punita Upadhyay
MKMark A. Khosa
Mark A. Khosa
TMTony Mak
Tony Mak
ASAbdus Shakir
Abdus Shakir
Aman UllahAman Ullah
Aman Ullah

7 January 2019 in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MZMuhammad Zubair
Muhammad Zubair
Aman UllahAman Ullah
Aman Ullah
This review article critically presents a comprehensive overview of the current advances in the research and development of proteins derived bionanocomposites used in food packaging applications. The recent interest in protein-based biomaterials is due to sustainability, renewability, biodegradability and low carbon footprint. The inherent drawbacks of proteins-based materials for food packaging applications are their low mechanical strength, poor thermal, barrier and inferior physicochemical properties. The nanoreinforced bio-based polymers called bionanocomposites provide an opportunity to overcome these issues and have ability to supersede non-biodegradable food packaging plastics produced from petroleum resources. So far, most studied protein derived bionanocomposites suitable for food packaging are soy protein isolates (SPI) and gelatin proteins. Layered silicates are the most promising nanofillers used to increase strength, improve heat resistance and enhance barrier properties of proteins derived materials while montmorillonites (MMT) is the most commonly used silicate nanofiller. This review emphases on the processing strategies used for proteins-based biomaterials, their mechanical and moisture barrier properties for food packaging applications. Different proteins and nanofillers that have been studied to date in proteins derived food packaging applications are also discussed in detail.

23 August 2023 in Carbohydrate Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YIYasir Iqbal
Yasir Iqbal
IAIqbal Ahmed
Iqbal Ahmed
MIMuhammad Faisal Irfan
Muhammad Faisal Irfan
SCShahzad Ali Shahid Chatha
Shahzad Ali Shahid Chatha
MZMuhammad Zubair
Muhammad Zubair
Aman UllahAman Ullah
Aman Ullah

21 August 2013 in RSC Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMuhammad Arshad Khosa
Muhammad Arshad Khosa
JWJianping Wu
Jianping Wu
Aman UllahAman Ullah
Aman Ullah
The current work exclusively pertains to preparing arsenic removing biosorbents using chicken feathers (CF) as a raw material. CF consist of keratinous proteins with many functional groups, and this paper contributes to the debate on how functional groups, especially –COOH, –NH2 and –S–S–, interact with arsenic species before and after their modification through sorption phenomena. Chemically modified CF biosorbents were investigated regarding their ability to remove As(III) from water. The modification results suggest that reactions occur mainly on the surface with noticeable changes on reactive sites in the interior of the modified chicken feathers (MCF). To prepare the modifications labelled as MCF-I and MCF-II, the feathers were treated with aqueous NaOH and sodium sulfite, respectively, to change their structure and morphology. Then, maleimide terminated poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) was added to the reaction mixture to enhance the mass and reactivity of the biosorbents. However, MCF-I and MCF-II displayed a relatively low sorption capacity (≥25–50%) for the removal of arsenic, but a higher capacity than raw CF. The methyl alcohol supported modification MCF-III, on the other hand, exhibited a significant performance in segregating negatively charged arsenic species from water. Therefore, esterified carboxylic groups (–COOH) in keratin were identified as particularly effective promoters of the arsenic uptake. Around 80–90% sorption capacity was observed within the first hour of contact between the MCF-III biosorbent and arsenic polluted water. Characterizations such as FTIR, XRD, DSC, TGA and SEM supported the modification of chicken feathers and the subsequent effect of this modification on the sorption, particularly when MCF-III was applied as a biosorbent. The role of pH was highly significant for changing the surface behaviour, and high uptake was observed at low pH for MCF-I, MCF-II and MCF-III. The kinetics of the biosorption capacities of CF, MCF-I, MCF-II and MCF-III were also evaluated and compared at different pH. The experimental kinetic data for MCF-III at variable pH followed pseudo second order model fits and are typical for chemisorption. Similarly, the Freundlich isotherm model supports our data with a high correlation value (R2) and demonstrates both monolayer and multilayer biosorption.

1 April 2020 in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASamira Alahyaribeik
Samira Alahyaribeik
Aman UllahAman Ullah
Aman Ullah