Philip Empey

Philip Empey

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLarisa H. Cavallari
Larisa H. Cavallari
CLCraig R. Lee
Craig R. Lee
ABAmber L. Beitelshees
Amber L. Beitelshees
RCRhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff
Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff
JDJulio D. Duarte
Julio D. Duarte
JJJulie A. Johnson
Julie A. Johnson

26 December 2017 in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PEPhilip Empey
Philip Empey
JSJames M. Stevenson
James M. Stevenson
STSony Tuteja
Sony Tuteja
KWKristin W. Weitzel
Kristin W. Weitzel
DADominick J. Angiolillo
Dominick J. Angiolillo
ONOn Behalf Of The Ignite Network
On Behalf Of The Ignite Network

25 February 2015 in Seminars in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TJTravis C. Jackson
Travis C. Jackson
NFNikki Miller Ferguson
Nikki Miller Ferguson
SCShaun W. Carlson
Shaun W. Carlson
DSDennis W. Simon
Dennis W. Simon
EBErik C. Brockman
Erik C. Brockman
PKPatrick M. Kochanek
Patrick M. Kochanek
Despite decades of basic and clinical research, treatments to improve outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are limited. However, based on the recent recognition of the prevalence of mild TBI, and its potential link to neurodegenerative disease, many new and exciting secondary injury mechanisms have been identified and several new therapies are being evaluated targeting both classic and novel paradigms. This includes a robust increase in both preclinical and clinical investigations. Using a mechanism-based approach the authors define the targets and emerging therapies for TBI. They address putative new therapies for TBI across both the spectrum of injury severity and the continuum of care, from the field to rehabilitation. They discussTBI therapy using 11 categories, namely, (1) excitotoxicity and neuronal death, (2) brain edema, (3) mitochondria and oxidative stress, (4) axonal injury, (5) inflammation, (6) ischemia and cerebral blood flow dysregulation, (7) cognitive enhancement, (8) augmentation of endogenous neuroprotection, (9) cellular therapies, (10) combination therapy, and (11) TBI resuscitation. The current golden age of TBI research represents a special opportunity for the development of breakthroughs in the field.

1 October 2008 in Journal of Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJimmi Hatton
Jimmi Hatton
BRBonnie Rosbolt
Bonnie Rosbolt
PEPhilip Empey
Philip Empey
RKRichard Kryscio
Richard Kryscio
BYByron Young
Byron Young
Object: Cyclosporine neuroprotection has been reported in brain injury models but safety and dosing guidelines have not been determined in humans with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The purpose of this investigation was to establish the safety of cyclosporine using 4 clinically relevant dosing schemes. Methods: The authors performed a prospective, blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized, dose-escalation trial of cyclosporine administration initiated within 8 hours of TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score range 4–8; motor score range 2–5). Four dosing cohorts (8 patients treated with cyclosporine and 2 receiving placebo treatment per cohort) received cyclosporine (1.25–5 mg/kg/day) or placebo in 2 divided doses (Cohorts I–III) or continuous infusion (Cohort IV) over 72 hours. Adverse events and outcome were monitored for 6 months. Results: Forty patients were enrolled over 3 years (cyclosporine cohorts, 24 male and 8 female patients; placebo group, 8 male patients). Systemic trough concentrations were below 250 ng/ml during intermittent doses. Higher blood concentrations were observed in Cohorts III and IV. There was no significant difference in immunological effects, adverse events, infection, renal dysfunction, or seizures. Mortality rate was not affected by cyclosporine administration, independent of dose, compared with placebo (6 of 32 patients receiving cyclosporine and 2 of 8 receiving placebo died, p > 0.05). At 6 months, a dose-related improvement in favorable outcome was observed in cyclosporine-treated patients (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In patients with acute TBI who received cyclosporine at doses up to 5 mg/kg/day, administered intravenously, with treatment initiated within 8 hours of injury, the rate of mortality or other adverse events was not significantly different from that of the placebo group.

1 December 2016 in American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KWKristin Wiisanen Weitzel
Kristin Wiisanen Weitzel
CAChristina L. Aquilante
Christina L. Aquilante
SJSamuel Johnson
Samuel Johnson
DKDavid Kisor
David Kisor
PEPhilip Empey
Philip Empey
Purpose. The current state of pharmacogenomics education for pharmacy students and practitioners is discussed, and resources and strategies to address

1 February 2016 in American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASolomon Adams
Solomon Adams
KAKacey B. Anderson
Kacey B. Anderson
Jim CoonsJim Coons
Jim Coons
RSRandall B. Smith
Randall B. Smith
SMSusan M. Meyer
Susan M. Meyer
PEPhilip Empey
Philip Empey
Objective. To develop, implement, and evaluate “Test2Learn” a program to enhance pharmacogenomics education through the use of personal genomic testing (PGT) and real genetic data.Design. One hundred twenty-two second-year doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) students in a required course were offered PGT as part of a larger program approach to teach pharmacogenomics within a robust ethical framework. The program added novel learning objectives, lecture materials, analysis tools, and exercises using individual-level and population-level genetic data. Outcomes were assessed with objective measures and pre/post survey instruments.Assessment. One hundred students (82%) underwent PGT. Knowledge significantly improved on multiple assessments. Genotyped students reported a greater increase in confidence in understanding test results by the end of the course. Similarly, undergoing PGT improved student’s self-perceived ability to empathize with patients compared to those not genotyped. Most students (71%) reported feeling...