Since their discovery, nanobodies have been used extensively in the fields of research, diagnostics and therapy. These antigen binding fragments, originating from Camelid heavy-chain antibodies, possess unusual hallmarks in terms of (small) size, stability, solubility and specificity, hence allowing cost-effective production and sometimes outperforming monoclonal antibodies. In this review, we evaluate the current status of nanobodies to study, diagnose, visualize or inhibit cancer-specific proteins and processes. Nanobodies are highly adaptable tools for cancer research as they enable specific modulation of targets, enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins alike. Molecular imaging studies benefit from the rapid, homogeneous tumor accumulation of nanobodies and their fast blood clearance, permitting previously unattainable fast tumor visualization. Moreover, they are endowed with considerable therapeutic potential as inhibitors of receptor-ligand pairs and deliverers of drugs or drug-loaded nanoparticles towards tumors. More in vivo and clinical studies are however eagerly awaited to unleash their full potential.

Over the last two decades, nanobodies or single-domain antibodies have found their way in research, diagnostics and therapy. These antigen binding fragments, derived from Camelid heavy chain only antibodies, possess remarkable characteristics that favor their use over conventional antibodies or fragments thereof, in selected areas of research. In this review, we assess the current status of nanobodies as research tools in diverse aspects of fundamental research. We discuss the use of nanobodies as detection reagents in fluorescence microscopy and focus on recent advances in super-resolution microscopy. Secondly, application of nanobody technology in investigating protein-protein interactions is reviewed, with emphasis on possible uses in mass spectrometry. Finally, we discuss the potential value of nanobodies in studying protein function and we focus on their recently reported application in targeted protein degradation. Throughout the review, we highlight state-of-the-art engineering strategies that could expand nanobody versatility and we suggest future applications of the technology in the selected areas of fundamental research.

Introduction: Aberrant turnover of the actin cytoskeleton is intimately associated with cancer cell migration and invasion. Frequently however, evidence is circumstantial, and a reliable assessment of the therapeutic significance of a gene product is offset by lack of inhibitors that target biologic properties of a protein, as most conventional drugs do, instead of the corresponding gene. Proteomic studies have demonstrated overexpression of CapG, a constituent of the actin cytoskeleton, in breast cancer. Indirect evidence suggests that CapG is involved in tumor cell dissemination and metastasis. In this study, we used llama-derived CapG single-domain antibodies or nanobodies in a breast cancer metastasis model to address whether inhibition of CapG activity holds therapeutic merit. Methods: We raised single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) against human CapG and used these as intrabodies (immunomodulation) after lentiviral transduction of breast cancer cells. Functional characterization of nanobodies was performed to identify which biochemical properties of CapG are perturbed. Orthotopic and tail vein in vivo models of metastasis in nude mice were used to assess cancer cell spreading. Results: With G-actin and F-actin binding assays, we identified a CapG nanobody that binds with nanomolar affinity to the first CapG domain. Consequently, CapG interaction with actin monomers or actin filaments is blocked. Intracellular delocalization experiments demonstrated that the nanobody interacts with CapG in the cytoplasmic environment. Expression of the nanobody in breast cancer cells restrained cell migration and Matrigel invasion. Notably, the nanobody prevented formation of lung metastatic lesions in orthotopic xenograft and tail-vein models of metastasis in immunodeficient mice. We showed that CapG nanobodies can be delivered into cancer cells by using bacteria harboring a type III protein secretion system (T3SS). Conclusions: CapG inhibition strongly reduces breast cancer metastasis. A nanobody-based approach offers a fast track for gauging the therapeutic merit of drug targets. Mapping of the nanobody-CapG interface may provide a platform for rational design of pharmacologic compounds.

CapG (gCap39) is a ubiquitous gelsolin-family actin modulating protein involved in cell signalling, receptor-mediated membrane ruffling, phagocytosis and motility. CapG is the only gelsolin-related actin binding protein that localizes constitutively to both nucleus and cytoplasm. Structurally related proteins like severin and fragmin are cytoplasmic because they contain a nuclear export sequence that is absent in CapG. Increased CapG expression has been reported in some cancers but a causal role for CapG in tumour development, including invasion and metastasis, has not been explored. We show that moderate expression of green fluorescent protein-tagged CapG (CapG-EGFP) in epithelial cells induces invasion into collagen type I and precultured chick heart fragments. Nuclear export sequence-tagged CapG-EGFP fails to induce invasion, whereas point mutations in the nuclear export sequence permitting nuclear re-entry restore cellular invasion. Nuclear import of CapG is energy-dependent and requires the cytosolic receptor importin β but not importin α. Nuclear CapG does not possess intrinsic transactivation activity but suppresses VP16 transactivation of a luciferase reporter gene in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, invasion requires signalling through the Ras-phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway and Cdc42 or RhoA, but not Rac1. We show for the first time active nuclear import of an actin binding protein, and our findings point to a role for nuclear CapG in eliciting invasion, possibly through interfering with the cellular transcription machinery.

Gelsolin is a widely distributed Ca²⁺‐dependent regulator of the cortical actin network. We demonstrate that gelsolin is phosphorylated by pp60^c‐src and that this phosphorylation is dramatically enhanced by phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate (PIP₂), known to specifically interact with gelsolin. Other phospholipids display only a marginal effect. pp56^lck, a tyrosine kinase of the same family, does not phosphorylate gelsolin. Other mammalian actin‐binding proteins such as profilin and CapG but also fragmin from Physarum polycephalum are similar targets for PIP₂‐stimulated pp60^c‐src phosphorylation.