Stephen Stansfeld

Prof. Stephen Stansfeld

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2014 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMathias Basner
Mathias Basner
WBWolfgang Babisch
Wolfgang Babisch
ADAdrian Davis
Adrian Davis
MBMark Brink
Mark Brink
CCCharlotte Clark
Charlotte Clark
SSStephen Stansfeld
Stephen Stansfeld

1 December 2006 in Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSStephen Stansfeld
Stephen Stansfeld
BCBridget Candy
Bridget Candy
Objectives To clarify the associations between psychosocial work stressors and mental ill health, a meta-analysis of psychosocial work stressors and common mental disorders was undertaken using longitudinal studies identified through a systematic literature review. Methods The review used a standardized search strategy and strict inclusion and quality criteria in seven databases in 1994–2005. Papers were identified from 24 939 citations covering social determinants of health, 50 relevant papers were identified, 38 fulfilled inclusion criteria, and 11 were suitable for a meta-analysis. The Comprehensive Meta-analysis Programme was used for decision authority, decision latitude, psychological demands, and work social support, components of the job-strain and iso-strain models, and the combination of effort and reward that makes up the effort–reward imbalance model and job insecurity. Cochran’s Q statistic assessed the heterogeneity of the results, and the I2 statistic determined any inconsistency between studies. Results Job strain, low decision latitude, low social support, high psychological demands, effort–reward imbalance, and high job insecurity predicted common mental disorders despite the heterogeneity for psychological demands and social support among men. The strongest effects were found for job strain and effort–reward imbalance. Conclusions This meta-analysis provides robust consistent evidence that (combinations of) high demands and low decision latitude and (combinations of) high efforts and low rewards are prospective risk factors for common mental disorders and suggests that the psychosocial work environment is important for mental health. The associations are not merely explained by response bias. The impact of work stressors on common mental disorders differs for women and men.

1 December 2003 in British Medical Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSStephen Stansfeld
Stephen Stansfeld
MMMark P Matheson
Mark P Matheson
Noise is a prominent feature of the environment including noise from transport, industry and neighbours. Exposure to transport noise disturbs sleep in the laboratory, but not generally in field studies where adaptation occurs. Noise interferes in complex task performance, modifies social behaviour and causes annoyance. Studies of occupational and environmental noise exposure suggest an association with hypertension, whereas community studies show only weak relationships between noise and cardiovascular disease. Aircraft and road traffic noise exposure are associated with psychological symptoms but not with clinically defined psychiatric disorder. In both industrial studies and community studies, noise exposure is related to raised catecholamine secretion. In children, chronic aircraft noise exposure impairs reading comprehension and long-term memory and may be associated with raised blood pressure. Further research is needed examining coping strategies and the possible health consequences of adaptation to noise.

1 June 2005 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSStephen Stansfeld
Stephen Stansfeld
BBB Berglund
B Berglund
CCC Clark
C Clark
ILI Lopez-Barrio
I Lopez-Barrio
PFP Fischer
P Fischer
BBBf Berry
Bf Berry

16 July 2010 in Journal of Adolescence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CRCatherine Rothon
Catherine Rothon
JHJenny Head
Jenny Head
EKEmily Klineberg
Emily Klineberg
SSStephen Stansfeld
Stephen Stansfeld
This paper investigates the extent to which social support can have a buffering effect against the potentially adverse consequences of bullying on school achievement and mental health. It uses a representative multiethnic sample of adolescents attending East London secondary schools in three boroughs. Bullied adolescents were less likely to achieve the appropriate academic achievement benchmark for their age group and bullied boys (but not girls) were more likely to exhibit depressive symptoms compared to those not bullied. High levels of social support from family were important in promoting good mental health. There was evidence that high levels of support from friends and moderate (but not high) family support was able to protect bullied adolescents from poor academic achievement. Support from friends and family was not sufficient to protect adolescents against mental health difficulties that they might face as a result of being bullied. More active intervention from schools is recommended.

26 March 2015 in Current Environmental Health Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSStephen Stansfeld
Stephen Stansfeld
CCCharlotte Clark
Charlotte Clark