Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can have viral or non-viral causes^1–5. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an important driver of HCC. Immunotherapy has been approved for treating HCC, but biomarker-based stratification of patients for optimal response to therapy is an unmet need^6,7. Here we report the progressive accumulation of exhausted, unconventionally activated CD8⁺PD1⁺T cells in NASH-affected livers. In preclinical models of NASH-induced HCC, therapeutic immunotherapy targeted at programmed death-1 (PD1) expanded activated CD8⁺PD1⁺T cells within tumours but did not lead to tumour regression, which indicates that tumour immune surveillance was impaired. When given prophylactically, anti-PD1 treatment led to an increase in the incidence of NASH–HCC and in the number and size of tumour nodules, which correlated with increased hepatic CD8⁺PD1⁺CXCR6⁺, TOX⁺, and TNF⁺T cells. The increase in HCC triggered by anti-PD1 treatment was prevented by depletion of CD8⁺T cells or TNF neutralization, suggesting that CD8⁺T cells help to induce NASH–HCC, rather than invigorating or executing immune surveillance. We found similar phenotypic and functional profiles in hepatic CD8⁺PD1⁺T cells from humans with NAFLD or NASH. A meta-analysis of three randomized phase III clinical trials that tested inhibitors of PDL1 (programmed death-ligand 1) or PD1 in more than 1,600 patients with advanced HCC revealed that immune therapy did not improve survival in patients with non-viral HCC. In two additional cohorts, patients with NASH-driven HCC who received anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 treatment showed reduced overall survival compared to patients with other aetiologies. Collectively, these data show that non-viral HCC, and particularly NASH–HCC, might be less responsive to immunotherapy, probably owing to NASH-related aberrant T cell activation causing tissue damage that leads to impaired immune surveillance. Our data provide a rationale for stratification of patients with HCC according to underlying aetiology in studies of immunotherapy as a primary or adjuvant treatment.

Background and Aims: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AtezoBev) is the standard of care for first‐line treatment of unresectable HCC. No evidence exists as to its use in routine clinical practice in patients with impaired liver function. Approach and Results: In 216 patients with HCC who were consecutively treated with AtezoBev across 11 tertiary centers, we retrospectively evaluated treatment‐related adverse events (trAEs) graded (G) according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, including in the analysis all patients treated according to label (n = 202, 94%). We also assessed overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall response (ORR), and disease control rates (DCR) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Disease was mostly secondary to viral hepatitis, namely hepatitis C (n = 72; 36%) and hepatitis B infection (n = 35, 17%). Liver function was graded as Child‐Pugh (CP)‐A in 154 patients (76%) and CP‐B in 48 (24%). Any grade trAEs were reported by 143 patients (71%), of which 53 (26%) were G3 and 3 (2%) G4. Compared with CP‐A, patients with CP‐B showed comparable rates of trAEs. Presence and grade of varices at pretreatment esophagogastroduodenoscopy did not correlate with bleeding events. After a median follow‐up of 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.8–10.1), median OS was 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.6–16.3), whereas median PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.2–8.5). ORR and DCR were respectively 25% and 73%, with no difference across CP classes. Conclusions: This study confirms reproducible safety and efficacy of AtezoBev in routine practice. Patients with CP‐B reported similar tolerability compared with CP‐A, warranting prospective evaluation of AtezoBev in this treatment‐deprived population.

Systemic inflammation is a hallmark of cancer, and it has a pivotal role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development and progression. We conducted a retrospective study including 362 patients receiving immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) across three continents, evaluating the influence of neutrophiles to lymphocytes ratio (NLR), platelets to lymphocytes ratio (PLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on overall (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and radiologic responses. In our 362 patients treated with immunotherapy, median OS and PFS were 9 and 3.5 months, respectively. Amongst tested inflammatory biomarkers, patients with NLR ≥ 5 had shorter OS (7.7 vs. 17.6 months, p < 0.0001), PFS (2.1 vs. 3.8 months, p = 0.025), and lower objective response rate (ORR) (12% vs. 22%, p = 0.034); similarly, patients with PLR ≥ 300 reported shorter OS (6.4 vs. 16.5 months, p < 0.0001) and PFS (1.8 vs. 3.7 months, p = 0.0006). NLR emerged as independent prognostic factors for OS in univariate and multivariate analysis (HR 1.95, 95%CI 1.45–2.64, p < 0.001; HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.23–2.42, p = 0.002) and PLR remained an independent prognostic factor for both OS and PFS in multivariate analysis (HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.6–2.40, p = 0.020; HR 1.99, 95%CI 1.11–3.49, p = 0.021). Systemic inflammation measured by NLR and PLR is an independent negative prognostic factor in HCC patients undergoing ICI therapy. Further studies are required to understand the biological mechanisms underlying this association and to investigate the predictive significance of circulating inflammatory biomarkers in HCC patients treated with ICIs.

The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (atezo+bev) is the current standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), providing a median overall survival (OS) of 19.2 months. Here, we aim to uncover the underlying cellular processes driving clinical benefit vs. resistance to atezo+bev. We harnessed the power of single-cell RNA sequencing in advanced HCC to derive gene expression signatures recapitulating 21 cell phenotypes. These signatures were applied to 422 RNA-sequencing samples of patients with advanced HCC treated with atezo+bev (n = 317) vs. atezolizumab (n = 47) or sorafenib (n = 58) as comparators. We unveiled two distinct patterns of response to atezo+bev. First, an immune-mediated response characterised by the combined presence of CD8+ T effector cells and pro-inflammatory CXCL10+ macrophages, representing an immune-rich microenvironment. Second, a non-immune, angiogenesis-related response distinguishable by a reduced expression of the VEGF co-receptor neuropilin-1 (NRP1), a biomarker that specifically predicts improved OS upon atezo+bev vs. sorafenib (p = 0.039). Primary resistance was associated with an enrichment of immunosuppressive myeloid populations, namely CD14+ monocytes and TREM2+ macrophages, and Notch pathway activation. Based on these mechanistic insights we define "Immune-competent" and "Angiogenesis-driven" molecular subgroups, each associated with a significantly longer OS with atezo+bev vs. sorafenib (p of interaction = 0.027), and a "Resistant" subset. Our study unveils two distinct molecular subsets of clinical benefit to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in advanced HCC ("Immune-competent" and "Angiogenesis-driven") as well as the main traits of primary resistance to this therapy, thus providing a molecular framework to stratify patients based on clinical outcome and guiding potential strategies to overcome resistance. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo+bev) is standard of care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet molecular determinants of clinical benefit to the combination remain unclear. This study harnesses the power of single-cell RNA sequencing, deriving gene expression signatures representing 21 cell subtypes in the advanced HCC microenvironment. By applying these signatures to RNA-sequencing samples, we reveal two distinct response patterns to atezo+bev and define molecular subgroups of patients ("Immune-competent" and "Angiogenesis-driven" vs. "Resistant") with differential clinical outcomes upon treatment with atezo+bev, pointing towards the role of immunosuppressive myeloid cell types and Notch pathway activation in primary resistance to atezo+bev. These results may help refine treatment strategies and improve outcomes for patients with advanced HCC, while also guiding future research aimed at overcoming resistance mechanisms.

Systemic inflammation is a key risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression and poor outcomes. Inflammatory markers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) may have prognostic value in HCC treated with standard of care atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev). We conducted a multicenter, international retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable HCC treated with Atezo-Bev to assess the association of NLR and PLR with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rates. Patients with NLR ≥ 5 had a significantly shorter OS (9.38 vs. 16.79 months, p < 0.001) and PFS (4.90 vs. 7.58 months, p = 0.03) compared to patients with NLR < 5. NLR ≥ 5 was an independent prognosticator of worse OS (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.22–3.56, p = 0.007) but not PFS. PLR ≥ 300 was also significantly associated with decreased OS (9.38 vs. 15.72 months, p = 0.007) and PFS (3.45 vs. 7.11 months, p = 0.04) compared to PLR < 300, but it was not an independent prognosticator of OS or PFS. NLR and PLR were not associated with objective response or disease control rates. NLR ≥ 5 independently prognosticated worse survival outcomes and is worthy of further study and validation.

Purpose: No evidence exists as to whether type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) impairs clinical outcome from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with solid tumors. Experimental Design: In a large cohort of ICI recipients treated at 21 institutions from June 2014 to June 2020, we studied whether patients on glucose-lowering medications (GLM) for T2DM had shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We used targeted transcriptomics in a subset of patients to explore differences in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of patients with or without diabetes. Results: A total of 1,395 patients were included. Primary tumors included non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 54.7%), melanoma (24.7%), renal cell (15.0%), and other carcinomas (5.6%). After multivariable analysis, patients on GLM (n = 226, 16.2%) displayed an increased risk of death [HR, 1.29; 95% confidence interval (CI),1.07–1.56] and disease progression/death (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03–1.43) independent of number of GLM received. We matched 92 metformin-exposed patients with 363 controls and 78 patients on other oral GLM or insulin with 299 control patients. Exposure to metformin, but not other GLM, was associated with an increased risk of death (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.16–2.03) and disease progression/death (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04–1.72). Patients with T2DM with higher pretreatment glycemia had higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.04), while exploratory tumoral transcriptomic profiling in a subset of patients (n = 22) revealed differential regulation of innate and adaptive immune pathways in patients with T2DM. Conclusions: In this study, patients on GLM experienced worse outcomes from immunotherapy, independent of baseline features. Prospective studies are warranted to clarify the relative impact of metformin over a preexisting diagnosis of T2DM in influencing poorer outcomes in this population.