In acute ischemic stroke, there is uncertainty regarding the benefit and risk of administering intravenous alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy.

The effect of embolization of the middle meningeal artery in patients with subacute or chronic subdural hematoma is uncertain. We performed a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial in China, involving patients with symptomatic nonacute subdural hematoma with mass effect. Patients were assigned to undergo burr-hole drainage or receive nonsurgical treatment at the surgeon's discretion, and patients in each group were then randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo middle meningeal artery embolization with liquid embolic material or to receive usual care. Patients whose condition warranted craniotomy were excluded. The primary outcome was symptomatic recurrence or progression of subdural hematoma within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included clinical and imaging outcomes. The main safety outcome was any serious adverse event (including death). The analysis included 722 patients, of whom 360 were assigned to the embolization group and 362 to the usual-care group. Burr-hole drainage was performed in 78.3% of the enrolled patients; among the patients who underwent burr-hole drainage, the procedure occurred after embolization in 99.6%. Symptomatic recurrence or progression of subdural hematoma within 90 days occurred in 24 patients (6.7%) in the embolization group and in 36 (9.9%) in the usual-care group (between-group difference, -3.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -7.4 to 0.8; P = 0.10). The incidence of serious adverse events was lower in the embolization group than in the usual-care group (6.7% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.02). Among patients with symptomatic nonacute subdural hematoma (of whom 78% underwent burr-hole drainage), middle meningeal artery embolization resulted in a 90-day incidence of symptomatic recurrence or progression similar to that with usual care but was associated with a lower incidence of serious adverse events. (Funded by Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center and others; MAGIC-MT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04700345.).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although flow diverters have been reported with favorable clinical and angiographic outcomes in various literatures, randomized trials determining their true effectiveness and safety are still in lack. The Parent Artery Reconstruction for Large or Giant Cerebral Aneurysms Using the Tubridge Flow Diverter (PARAT) trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Tubridge flow diverter in the treatment of large or giant aneurysms in comparison with Enterprise stent-assisted coiling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized trial was conducted at 12 hospitals throughout China. Enrolled adults with unruptured large/giant intracranial aneurysms were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either Enterprise stent-assisted coiling or Tubridge flow diverter implantation. The primary end point was complete occlusion at 6-month follow-up, while secondary end points included technical success, mortality, target vessel–related stroke, aneurysm bleeding, in-stent stenosis, parent artery occlusion, and the frequency of all adverse events. RESULTS: Among 185 enrolled subjects, 41 withdrew before procedure initiation. Overall, 82 subjects underwent Tubridge implantation, and 62 subjects were primarily treated with stent-assisted coiling. The results of 6-month follow-up imaging included complete occlusion rates of 75.34% versus 24.53% for the Tubridge and stent-assisted coiling groups, respectively, with a calculated common odds ratio of 9.4 (95% confidence interval, 4.14–21.38; P < .001). There was a higher, nonsignificant frequency of complications for Tubridge subjects. Multivariate analysis showed a decreased stroke rate at the primary investigational site, with a marginal P value (P = .051). CONCLUSIONS: This trial showed an obviously higher rate of large and giant aneurysm obliteration with the Tubridge FD over Enterprise stent-assisted coiling. However, this higher obliteration rate came at the cost of a nonsignificantly higher rate of complications. Investigational site comparisons suggested that a learning curve for flow-diverter implantation should be recognized and factored into trial designs.

Background: The added value of intravenous alteplase in reperfusing ischemic brain tissue in patients undergoing endovascular treatment and directly presented to an endovascular treatment-capable hospital is uncertain. We conducted this post hoc analysis of a randomized trial (DIRECT-MT [Direct Intraarterial Thrombectomy in Order to Revascularize Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial]) to explore the association of intravenous alteplase, early (preendovascular treatment) reperfusion, and clinical outcome and to determine factors which may modify alteplase treatment effect on early reperfusion. Methods: In this post hoc analysis of the DIRECT-MT randomized trial comparing intravenous alteplase before endovascular treatment versus endovascular treatment only, 623 of 656 randomized patients, with adequate angiographic evaluation for early reperfusion assessment, were included. The association of intravenous alteplase and early reperfusion (defined as expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2a on angiogram) was assessed using unadjusted comparisons and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 623 patients included (317 received intravenous alteplase and 306 did not), early reperfusion occurred in 91 (15%) patients and was associated with better functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2 of 49/91 [54%] versus 178/531 [34%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.15–3.21]; P 33 minutes; adjusted odds ratio, 4.07 [95% CI, 1.86–8.86]; P _interaction =0.012). Conclusions: For patients with large vessel occlusion directly presenting to an endovascular treatment–capable hospital, intravenous alteplase increases early reperfusion when endovascular treatment gets delayed more than approximately half an hour. Thus, intravenous alteplase should be considered if endovascular treatment delays are anticipated by the treating medical team. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03469206.

Background and Purpose: Recent trials showed thrombectomy alone was comparable to bridging therapy in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion eligible for both intravenous alteplase and endovascular thrombectomy. We performed this study to examine whether occlusion site modifies the effect of intravenous alteplase before thrombectomy. Methods: This is a prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized trial evaluating risk and benefit of intravenous alteplase before thrombectomy (DIRECT-MT [Direct Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy in Order to Revascularize AIS Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals]). Among 656 randomized patients, 640 with baseline occlusion site information were included. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis with an interaction term was used to estimate treatment effect modification by occlusion location (internal carotid artery versus M1 versus M2). We report the adjusted common odds ratio for a shift toward better outcome on the modified Rankin Scale after thrombectomy alone compared with combination treatment adjusted for age, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline, the time from stroke onset to randomization, the modified Rankin Scale score before stroke onset, and collateral score per the DIRECT-MT statistical analysis plan. Results: The overall adjusted common odds ratio was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.82–1.43) with thrombectomy alone compared with combination treatment, and there was no significant treatment-by-occlusion site interaction ( P =0.47). In subgroups based on occlusion location, we found the following adjusted common odds ratios: 0.99 (95% CI, 0.62–1.59) for internal carotid artery occlusions, 1.12 (95% CI, 0.77–1.64) for M1 occlusions, and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.53–2.79) for M2 occlusions. No treatment-by-occlusion site interactions were observed for dichotomized modified Rankin Scale distributions and successful reperfusion (extended thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b) before thrombectomy. Differences in symptomatic hemorrhage rate were not significant between occlusion locations (internal carotid artery occlusion: 7.02% in bridging therapy versus 7.14% for thrombectomy alone, P =0.97; M1 occlusion: 5.06% versus 2.48%, P =0.22; M2 occlusion: 9.09% versus 4.76%; P =0.78). Conclusions: In this prespecified subgroup of a randomized trial, we found no evidence that occlusion location can inform intravenous alteplase decisions in endovascular treatment eligible patients directly presenting at endovascular treatment capable centers. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03469206.

Astrocyte plays important roles in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke and reperfusion injury. They intensively participate in the energy metabolism of the brain, while their heterogeneity and function after ischemic stroke remain controversial. By employing single‐cell sequencing of mice cortex at 12 h after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) and comparing with the similar published datasets of 24h after tMCAO, we uncover the cellular phenotypes and dynamic change of astrocytes at the acute phase of ischemic stroke. In this study, we separately identified 3 major subtypes of astrocytes at the 12 h‐tMCAO‐system and 24 h‐tMCAO‐system, indicated the significant differences in the expression of genes and metabolic pathways in the astrocytes between the two time nodes after ischemic stroke, and detected the major change in the energy metabolism. These results provided a comprehensive understanding of the characteristic changes of astrocytes after ischemic stroke and explored the potential astrocytic targets for neuroprotection.