Magdalena Karolina Kowalik

Dr. Magdalena Karolina Kowalik

Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima 10, 10–747 Olsztyn, Poland

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2013 in Reproductive Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMagdalena Karolina Kowalik
Magdalena Karolina Kowalik
RRRobert Rekawiecki
Robert Rekawiecki
JKJan Kotwica
Jan Kotwica


1 April 2016 in Domestic Animal Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMagdalena Karolina Kowalik
Magdalena Karolina Kowalik
MMM. Martyniak
M. Martyniak
RRRobert Rekawiecki
Robert Rekawiecki
JKJ. Kotwica
J. Kotwica



1 December 2013 in Acta Veterinaria Hungarica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRobert Rekawiecki
Robert Rekawiecki
MKMagdalena Karolina Kowalik
Magdalena Karolina Kowalik
JKJan Kotwica
Jan Kotwica
The aim of this study was to determine the steady-state expression of 13 selected housekeeping genes in the myometrium of cyclic and pregnant cows. Cells taken from bovine myometrium on days 1–5, 6–10, 11–16 and 17–20 of the oestrous cycle and in weeks 3–5, 6–8 and 9–12 of pregnancy were used. Reverse transcribed RNA was amplified in real-time PCR using designed primers. Reaction efficiency was determined with the Linreg programme. The geNorm and NormFinder programmes were used to select the best housekeeping genes. They calculate the expression stability factor for each used housekeeping gene with the smallest value for most stably expressed genes. According to geNorm, the most stable housekeeping genes in the myometrium were C2orf29, TPB and TUBB2B, while the least stably expressed genes were 18S RNA, HPRT1 and GAPDH. NormFinder identified the best genes in the myometrium as C2orf29, MRPL12 and TBP, while the worst genes were 18S RNA, B2M and SF3A1. Differences in stability factors between the two programmes may also indicate that the physiological status of the female, e.g. pregnancy, affects the stability of expression of housekeeping genes. The different expression stability of housekeeping genes did not affect progesterone receptor expression but it could be important if small differences in gene expression were measured between studies.