Julie Perroy

Dr. Julie Perroy

IGF, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 May 2011 in Molecular Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CDC M Durand
C M Durand
JPJulie Perroy
Julie Perroy
FLF Loll
F Loll
DPD Perrais
D Perrais
LFL Fagni
L Fagni
NSNathalie Sans
Nathalie Sans
Genetic mutations of SHANK3 have been reported in patients with intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia. At the synapse, Shank3/ProSAP2 is a scaffolding protein that connects glutamate receptors to the actin cytoskeleton via a chain of intermediary elements. Although genetic studies have repeatedly confirmed the association of SHANK3 mutations with susceptibility to psychiatric disorders, very little is known about the neuronal consequences of these mutations. Here, we report the functional effects of two de novo mutations (STOP and Q321R) and two inherited variations (R12C and R300C) identified in patients with ASD. We show that Shank3 is located at the tip of actin filaments and enhances its polymerization. Shank3 also participates in growth cone motility in developing neurons. The truncating mutation (STOP) strongly affects the development and morphology of dendritic spines, reduces synaptic transmission in mature neurons and also inhibits the effect of Shank3 on growth cone motility. The de novo mutation in the ankyrin domain (Q321R) modifies the roles of Shank3 in spine induction and morphology, and actin accumulation in spines and affects growth cone motility. Finally, the two inherited mutations (R12C and R300C) have intermediate effects on spine density and synaptic transmission. Therefore, although inherited by healthy parents, the functional effects of these mutations strongly suggest that they could represent risk factors for ASD. Altogether, these data provide new insights into the synaptic alterations caused by SHANK3 mutations in humans and provide a robust cellular readout for the development of knowledge-based therapies.

1 February 2002 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BDBéatrice Duthey
Béatrice Duthey
SCSara Caudron
Sara Caudron
JPJulie Perroy
Julie Perroy
BBBernhard Bettler
Bernhard Bettler
LFLaurent Fagni
Laurent Fagni
LPLaurent Prézeau
Laurent Prézeau
Although G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been shown to assemble into functional homo or heteromers, the role of each protomer in G-protein activation is not known. Among the GPCRs, the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type B receptor (GABABR) is the only one known so far that needs two subunits, GB1 and GB2, to function. The GB1 subunit contains the GABA binding site but is unable to activate G-proteins alone. In contrast the GB2 subunit, which does not bind GABA, has an heptahelical domain able to activate G-proteins when assembled into homodimers (Galvez, T., Duthey, B., Kniazeff, J., Blahos, J., Rovelli, G., Bettler, B., Prézeau, L., and Pin, J.-P. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 2152–2159). In the present study, we have examined the role of each subunit within the GB1-GB2 heteromer, in G-protein coupling. To that end, point mutations in the highly conserved third intracellular loop known to prevent G-protein activation of the related Ca-sensing or metabotropic glutamate receptors were introduced into GB1 and GB2. One mutation, L686P introduced in GB2 prevents the formation of a functional receptor, even though the heteromer reaches the cell surface, and even though the mutated subunit still associates with GB1 and increases GABA affinity on GB1. This was observed either in HEK293 cells where the activation of the G-protein was assessed by measurement of inositol phosphate accumulation, or in cultured neurons where the inhibition of the Ca2+ channel current was measured. In contrast, the same mutation when introduced into GB1 does not modify the G-protein coupling properties of the heteromeric GABABreceptor either in HEK293 cells or in neurons. Accordingly, whereas in all GPCRs the same protein is responsible for both agonist binding and G-protein activation, these two functions are assumed by two distinct subunits in the GABAB heteromer: one subunit, GB1, binds the agonists whereas the other, GB2, activates the G-protein. This illustrates the importance of a single subunit for G-protein activation within a dimeric receptor.

1 February 2010 in Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJoël Bockaert
Joël Bockaert
JPJulie Perroy
Julie Perroy
CBCarine Bécamel
Carine Bécamel
PMPhilippe Marin
Philippe Marin
LFLaurent Fagni
Laurent Fagni
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key transmembrane recognition molecules for regulatory signals such as light, odors, taste hormones, and neurotransmitters. In addition to activating guanine nucleotide binding proteins (G proteins), GPCRs associate with a variety of GPCR-interacting proteins (GIPs). GIPs contain structural interacting domains that allow the formation of large functional complexes involved in G protein-dependent and -independent signaling. At the cellular level, other functions of GIPs include targeting of GPCRs to subcellular compartments and their trafficking to and from the plasma membrane. Recently, roles of GPCR-GIP interactions in central nervous system physiology and pathologies have been revealed. Here, we highlight the role of GIPs in some important neurological and psychiatric disorders, as well as their potential for the future development of therapeutic drugs.

6 July 2012 in Hippocampus
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GGGiuseppe Gangarossa
Giuseppe Gangarossa
SLSophie Longueville
Sophie Longueville
DBDimitri De Bundel
Dimitri De Bundel
JPJulie Perroy
Julie Perroy
DHDenis Hervé
Denis Hervé
EVEmmanuel Valjent
Emmanuel Valjent

18 November 2004 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJulie Perroy
Julie Perroy
SPStephanie Pontier
Stephanie Pontier
PCPascale G Charest
Pascale G Charest
MAMuriel Aubry
Muriel Aubry
MBMichel Bouvier
Michel Bouvier

1 March 2008 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJulie Perroy
Julie Perroy
FRFabrice Raynaud
Fabrice Raynaud
VHVincent Homburger
Vincent Homburger
MRMarie-Claude Rousset
Marie-Claude Rousset
LTLudovic Telley
Ludovic Telley
LFLaurent Fagni
Laurent Fagni
Functional interplay between ionotropic and metabotropic receptors frequently involves complex intracellular signaling cascades. The group I metabotropic glutamate receptor mGlu5a co-clusters with the ionotropic N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in hippocampal neurons. In this study, we report that a more direct cross-talk can exist between these types of receptors. Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer in living HEK293 cells, we demonstrate that mGlu5a and NMDA receptor clustering reflects the existence of direct physical interactions. Consequently, the mGlu5a receptor decreased NMDA receptor current, and reciprocally, the NMDA receptor strongly reduced the ability of the mGlu5a receptor to release intracellular calcium. We show that deletion of the C terminus of the mGlu5a receptor abolished both its interaction with the NMDA receptor and reciprocal inhibition of the receptors. This direct functional interaction implies a higher degree of target-effector specificity, timing, and subcellular localization of signaling than could ever be predicted with complex signaling pathways.