Maria E. Moreira

Prof. Dr. Maria E. Moreira

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 July 2019 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KNKarin Nielsen-Saines
Karin Nielsen-Saines
PBPatrícia Brasil
Patrícia Brasil
TKTara Kerin
Tara Kerin
Zilton VasconcelosZilton Vasconcelos
Zilton Vasconcelos
CGClaudia Raja Gabaglia
Claudia Raja Gabaglia
MMMaria E. Moreira
Maria E. Moreira

17 October 2016 in Reproductive Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMaria Do Carmo Leal
Maria Do Carmo Leal
AEAna Paula Esteves-Pereira
Ana Paula Esteves-Pereira
MNMarcos Nakamura-Pereira
Marcos Nakamura-Pereira
JTJacqueline Alves Torres
Jacqueline Alves Torres
MTMariza Miranda Theme-Filha
Mariza Miranda Theme-Filha
SGSilvana Granado Gama
Silvana Granado Gama
The rate of preterm birth has been increasing worldwide, including in Brazil. This constitutes a significant public health challenge because of the higher levels of morbidity and mortality and long-term health effects associated with preterm birth. This study describes and quantifies factors affecting spontaneous and provider-initiated preterm birth in Brazil. Data are from the 2011–2012 “Birth in Brazil” study, which used a national population-based sample of 23,940 women. We analyzed the variables following a three-level hierarchical methodology. For each level, we performed non-conditional multiple logistic regression for both spontaneous and provider-initiated preterm birth. The rate of preterm birth was 11.5 %, (95 % confidence 10.3 % to 12.9 %) 60.7 % spontaneous - with spontaneous onset of labor or premature preterm rupture of membranes - and 39.3 % provider-initiated, with more than 90 % of the last group being pre-labor cesarean deliveries. Socio-demographic factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth were adolescent pregnancy, low total years of schooling, and inadequate prenatal care. Other risk factors were previous preterm birth (OR 3.74; 95 % CI 2.92–4.79), multiple pregnancy (OR 16.42; 95 % CI 10.56–25.53), abruptio placentae (OR 2.38; 95 % CI 1.27–4.47) and infections (OR 4.89; 95 % CI 1.72–13.88). In contrast, provider-initiated preterm birth was associated with private childbirth healthcare (OR 1.47; 95 % CI 1.09–1.97), advanced-age pregnancy (OR 1.27; 95 % CI 1.01–1.59), two or more prior cesarean deliveries (OR 1.64; 95 % CI 1.19–2.26), multiple pregnancy (OR 20.29; 95 % CI 12.58–32.72) and any maternal or fetal pathology (OR 6.84; 95 % CI 5.56–8.42). The high proportion of provider-initiated preterm birth and its association with prior cesarean deliveries and all of the studied maternal/fetal pathologies suggest that a reduction of this type of prematurity may be possible. The association of spontaneous preterm birth with socially-disadvantaged groups reaffirms that the reduction of social and health inequalities should continue to be a national priority.

22 August 2012 in Reproductive Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMaria Do Carmo Leal
Maria Do Carmo Leal
ASAntonio A Silva
Antonio A Silva
MDMarcos Augusto Bastos Dias
Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias
SGSilvana Granado Nogueira da Gama
Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama
DRDaphne Rattner
Daphne Rattner
CSCelia Landmann Szwarcwald
Celia Landmann Szwarcwald
Background: Caesarean section rates in Brazil have been steadily increasing. In 2009, for the first time, the number of children born by this type of procedure was greater than the number of vaginal births. Caesarean section is associated with a series of adverse effects on the women and newborn, and recent evidence suggests that the increasing rates of prematurity and low birth weight in Brazil are associated to the increasing rates of Caesarean section and labour induction. Methods: Nationwide hospital-based cohort study of postnatal women and their offspring with follow-up at 45 to 60 days after birth. The sample was stratified by geographic macro-region, type of the municipality and by type of hospital governance. The number of postnatal women sampled was 23,940, distributed in 191 municipalities throughout Brazil. Two electronic questionnaires were applied to the postnatal women, one baseline face-to-face and one follow-up telephone interview. Two other questionnaires were filled with information on patients’ medical records and to assess hospital facilities. The primary outcome was the percentage of Caesarean sections (total, elective and according to Robson’s groups). Secondary outcomes were: post-partum pain; breastfeeding initiation; severe/near miss maternal morbidity; reasons for maternal mortality; prematurity; low birth weight; use of oxygen use after birth and mechanical ventilation; admission to neonatal ICU; stillbirths; neonatal mortality; readmission in hospital; use of surfactant; asphyxia; severe/near miss neonatal morbidity. The association between variables were investigated using bivariate, stratified and multivariate model analyses. Statistical tests were applied according to data distribution and homogeneity of variances of groups to be compared. All analyses were taken into consideration for the complex sample design. Discussion: This study, for the first time, depicts a national panorama of labour and birth outcomes in Brazil. Regardless of the socioeconomic level, demand for Caesarean section appears to be based on the belief that the quality of obstetric care is closely associated to the technology used in labour and birth. Within this context, it was justified to conduct a nationwide study to understand the reasons that lead pregnant women to submit to Caesarean sections and to verify any association between this type of birth and it’s consequences on postnatal health.

17 October 2016 in Reproductive Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MNMarcos Nakamura-Pereira
Marcos Nakamura-Pereira
MLMaria Do Carmo Leal
Maria Do Carmo Leal
AEAna Paula Esteves-Pereira
Ana Paula Esteves-Pereira
RDRosa Maria Domingues
Rosa Maria Domingues
JTJacqueline Alves Torres
Jacqueline Alves Torres
MMMaria E. Moreira
Maria E. Moreira
Cesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide but there is some concern with this trend because of potential maternal and perinatal risks. The Robson classification is the standard method to monitor and compare CS rates. Our objective was to analyze CS rates in Brazil according to source of payment for childbirth (public or private) using the Robson classification. Data are from the 2011–2012 “Birth in Brazil” study, which used a national hospital-based sample of 23,940 women. We categorized all women into Robson groups and reported the relative size of each Robson group, the CS rate in each group and the absolute and relative contributions made by each to the overall CS rate. Differences were analyzed through chi-square and Z-test with a significance level of < 0.05. The overall CS rate in Brazil was 51.9 % (42.9 % in the public and 87.9 % in the private health sector). The Robson groups with the highest impact on Brazil’s CS rate in both public and private sectors were group 2 (nulliparous, term, cephalic with induced or cesarean delivery before labor), group 5 (multiparous, term, cephalic presentation and previous cesarean section) and group 10 (cephalic preterm pregnancies), which accounted for more than 70 % of CS carried out in the country. High-risk women had significantly greater CS rates compared with low-risk women in almost all Robson groups in the public sector only. Public policies should be directed at reducing CS in nulliparous women, particularly by reducing the number of elective CS in these women, and encouraging vaginal birth after cesarean to reduce repeat CS in multiparous women.

19 March 2014 in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLeticia Krauss-Silva
Leticia Krauss-Silva
AAAntonio Almada-Horta
Antonio Almada-Horta
MAMariane B Alves
Mariane B Alves
KCKarla G Camacho
Karla G Camacho
MMMaria E. Moreira
Maria E. Moreira
ABAlcione Braga
Alcione Braga
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) increases the risk of spontaneous preterm deliveries (PD) in developed countries. Its prevalence varies with ethnicity, socioeconomic conditions and gestational age. Aerobic vaginitis (AV) has also been implicated with spontaneous PD. The present study aimed to estimate the prevalence of asymptomatic BV, the accuracy of vaginal pH level to predict BV and to estimate the risk of spontaneous PD <34 and <37 weeks’ gestation of BV and AV.

1 January 2014 in Jornal de Pediatria
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PLPaola Azara Tabicas Lima
Paola Azara Tabicas Lima
MCManoel de Carvalho
Manoel de Carvalho
ACAna Carolina Carioca da Costa
Ana Carolina Carioca da Costa
MMMaria E. Moreira
Maria E. Moreira
To determine the rate of extrauterine growth restriction in very low birth weight infants and to evaluate the influence of perinatal variables, clinical practices, and neonatal morbidities on this outcome. A longitudinal study was performed in four neonatal units in the city of Rio de Janeiro. 570 very low birth weight infants were analyzed. The study included perinatal variables, variables related to clinical practices, and incident morbidities in these preterm infants. Extrauterine growth restriction was defined using z-scores for weight or head circumference ≤ -2 for corrected age. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and R software. This study comprised 570 infants, of which 49% were males, and 33% were small for gestational age (SGA). The mean weight and head circumference at birth were 1,113 ± 267 g and 27 ± 2 cm, respectively. The mean z-scores of birth weight and weight at discharge were -0.96 ± 0.78 and -1.54 ± 0.75, respectively; for head circumference, the mean z-scores at birth and at discharge were -0.63 ± 1.18 and -0.45 ± 0.94, respectively. The rate of extrauterine growth restriction considering the weight was 26% (149/570) and considering the head circumference, 5% (29/570). SGA was the variable with the greatest impact on both growth restriction for weight (PR = 4.33) and for head circumference (PR = 2.11) in adjusted analyses. extrauterine growth restriction was high in the population, especially for SGA newborns and those with neonatal morbidities.