This contribution considers the theoretical, methodological, and analytical aspects of implementing a strategic approach to the management of corporate environmental responsibility in practice. The economic and normative approach to understanding the essence of corporate environmental responsibility is revealed; the key factors are systematized. Based on the generalization of theoretical and methodological provisions for corporate environmental responsibility, the authors formulated a concept for the strategic management thereof. An approach to understanding the content and forms of environmental responsibility at different stages of a company’s lifecycle is formulated. The main indicators that enable the analysis of corporate environmental responsibility from the point of view of the chain “inputs-processes-outputs” are systematized. Analytical studies of corporate environmental responsibility are conducted on the basis of information concerning automotive companies, in particular in terms of the following main areas: the study of global trends, monitoring of environmental goals and their reflection in development strategy, comprehensive analysis of environmental responsibility, the study of the balance of environmental and economic indicators. To achieve the aforementioned, the following were used: quantitative and qualitative methods, analytical and comparative methods of processing, analysis and synthesis of statistical information, economic and mathematical modelling, etc. The mechanism of transforming global environmental challenges into environmental responsibility management in practice is substantiated. An organizational mechanism is put forward for developing an environmental responsibility management system based on a strategic approach focused on implementation in practice. The key tools for implementing theoretical and methodological provisions in management practice are also identified.

The purpose of the article is to develop a methodological approach towards assessing the economic security of institutions of higher education. Methodology. There has been generalized the experience of foreign universities in terms of providing high standards of educational and research process in the context of ensuring their economic security in modern conditions. The study has been conducted on the comparison of aggregate indicators of the economic security of HEIs based on the results of factor analysis (the method of the main components). The output data are formed taking into account the main approaches to constructing a balanced system of indicators based on the results of cluster analysis. The integral indicators of economic security of HEIs and integral indicators of economic security in general have been calculated based on the values of factor loadings and weighting coefficients of indicators for each group. Results. The system of performance indicators of the world leading universities has been formed and the key factors of economic security of foreign universities have been identified taking into account the generalized experience of foreign universities. The developed methodological approach to the assessment is universal and provides opportunities for developing measures to improve the level of economic security of institutions of higher education. Studies have shown that the economic security of economic entities is not least determined by the management efficiency of intellectual resources. Practical implications. The calculated level of HEI economic security is an indicator not only for protecting it from threats but also for the causal link between socio-economic development of the state, its economic potential and the level of higher education. Value/originality. The holistic scientific and practical study has been carried out in the article taking into account the interconnection of higher education and economic security of institutions of higher education and a methodical approach to the evaluation of the economic security of HEIs has been developed. The above stipulates the necessity of developing a methodological approach to assessing the risks to the economic security of institutions of higher education on the basis of possible threats to their activities.

Digitization, as a process of comprehensive use of digital technologies, significantly affects the management decision-making process and determines the development of digital management. The article aims to investigate the role of digital management in increasing the efficiency of activities and the development of the enterprise in general. The concept of digital management is the basis for understanding the elements of digital management. Among the main advantages of digital management are the ability to collect and analyse large volumes of data, automation of interaction with partners and customers, improvement of management tools, etc. Peculiarities of the formation of the digital management system in practice have been studied in the example of Nestlé and Roshen companies. Nestlé's digital transformation experience uses tools like artificial intelligence, cloud technologies, blockchain, and big data. The Roshen company actively implements digital technologies in production, sales, and personnel management. The development and implementation of the corresponding strategy is the digitalization management tool. The digitalization strategy is the process of introducing digital technologies into various spheres of the company's activity. Based on a review of scientific sources, essential elements of digital management, such as leadership, a balanced approach, and the taking of promising trends into account, were determined. The article also provides a list of typical programs used in digital management. It also emphasized the importance of creating favourable conditions for forming a digital management system; in particular, it is necessary to implement strategic planning, support management, train staff, and provide resources. Recommendations on the implementation of digital management at Ukrainian enterprises are provided.

War is a challenge for any country, and therefore, studying the socio-economic consequences of war is essential from the point of view of their evaluation in terms of value. The article aims to systematize the main consequences of the war and conduct their analysis using the example of the intermediate stage of the war in Ukraine in 2022. The article systematizes scientific approaches to the study of the consequences of war. Scholars examine the effects of war at the international, national, and regional levels. Even before the war, the regions of Ukraine differed in their modernization potential and needed the implementation of a strategy of accelerated development. It is proposed to assess the consequences of the war from the standpoint of the difference between the available resources and the resources after the war, which allows for the assessment of direct losses. The second proposed approach estimates lost opportunities at the expense of unused potential. The consequences of the war are considered in terms of social, economic, ecological and political processes. The consequences of war are traditionally assessed by the GDP indicator. A rather limited number of indicators were used to assess the consequences of the war in Ukraine due to the lack of publicly available information. An analysis of the scale of loss of territory, the business activity of businesses, dynamics of human resources, financial results, and investment activity, international trade, and sustainability of local budgets was carried out. It is noted that all regions of Ukraine have experienced a significant deterioration in indicators, which means not only a change in the main functional areas but also a change in the recovery potential. The development of specific regions is influenced by migration processes and large-scale relocation of enterprises, which leads to a certain territorial redistribution of production potential and new conditions. Those regions with a high potential for development before the war suffered the most significant losses and will require a large-scale restoration of all types of infrastructure. Constant monitoring of the socio-economic consequences of the war across regions allows not only to carry out a cost assessment of such losses, but also to determine the content of further recovery strategies that will have to be developed for the regions of Ukraine. Війна є викликом для будь-якої країни, а тому дослідження соціально-економічних наслідків війни є важливим з точки зору їх оцінювання у вартісному вираженні. В статті поставлено мету систематизації основних наслідків війни та проведення їх аналізу на прикладі проміжного етапу агресії проти України за 2022 рік. В статті систематизовано наукові підходи дослідження наслідків війни. Вчені розкривають наслідки війни на міжнародному, національному та регіональному рівнях. Регіони України і до війни відрізнялись різним модернізаційним потенціалом та потребували реалізації стратегії прискореного розвитку. Запропоновано оцінювати наслідки війни з позицій різниці між наявними ресурсами та ресурсами після війни, що дозволяє оцінити прямі втрати. Другий пропонований підхід передбачає оцінку втрачених можливостей за рахунок невикористаного потенціалу. Наслідки війни розглядаються у розрізі соціальних, економічних, екологічних та політичних процесів. Наслідки війни традиційно оцінюють за показником ВВП. Для оцінки наслідків війни в Україні використано досить обмежену кількість показників, через брак інформації у відкритому доступі. Проведено аналіз масштабів втрати території, ділової активності бізнесу, динаміки людських ресурсів, фінансових результатів та інвестиційної активності, міжнародної торгівлі та стійкості бюджетів місцевих бюджетів. Зазначено, що всі області України отримали суттєве погіршення показників, що означає не лише зміну основних функціональних сфер, а й відновлювального потенціалу. На розвиток окремих областей впливають і міграційні процеси, і масштабна релокація підприємств, що призводить до певного територіального перерозподілу виробничого потенціалу та створення нових умов. Ті області, які до війни мали високий потенціал розвитку, зазнали найбільших втрат та будуть потребувати масштабного відновлення всіх видів інфраструктури. Постійний моніторинг соціально-економічних наслідків війни у...