Mark A. Williams

Dr. Mark A. Williams

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2011 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KJKamlesh Jangid
Kamlesh Jangid
MWMark A. Williams
Mark A. Williams
AFAlan Franzluebbers
Alan Franzluebbers
TSThomas M. Schmidt
Thomas M. Schmidt
DCDavid C. Coleman
David C. Coleman
WWWilliam B. Whitman
William B. Whitman

2 August 2019 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FBFelipe Bastida
Felipe Bastida
CGCarlos García
Carlos García
NFNoah Fierer
Noah Fierer
DEDavid J. Eldridge
David J. Eldridge
MBMatthew A. Bowker
Matthew A. Bowker
MDManuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Identifying the global drivers of soil priming is essential to understanding C cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. We conducted a survey of soils across 86 globally-distributed locations, spanning a wide range of climates, biotic communities, and soil conditions, and evaluated the apparent soil priming effect using13C-glucose labeling. Here we show that the magnitude of the positive apparent priming effect (increase in CO2release through accelerated microbial biomass turnover) was negatively associated with SOC content and microbial respiration rates. Our statistical modeling suggests that apparent priming effects tend to be negative in more mesic sites associated with higher SOC contents. In contrast, a single-input of labile C causes positive apparent priming effects in more arid locations with low SOC contents. Our results provide solid evidence that SOC content plays a critical role in regulating apparent priming effects, with important implications for the improvement of C cycling models under global change scenarios.

15 March 2019 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDManuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
RBRichard D. Bardgett
Richard D. Bardgett
PVPeter M. Vitousek
Peter M. Vitousek
FMFernando T. Maestre
Fernando T. Maestre
MWMark A. Williams
Mark A. Williams
NFNoah Fierer
Noah Fierer
Belowground organisms play critical roles in maintaining multiple ecosystem processes, including plant productivity, decomposition, and nutrient cycling. Despite their importance, however, we have a limited understanding of how and why belowground biodiversity (bacteria, fungi, protists, and invertebrates) may change as soils develop over centuries to millennia (pedogenesis). Moreover, it is unclear whether belowground biodiversity changes during pedogenesis are similar to the patterns observed for aboveground plant diversity. Here we evaluated the roles of resource availability, nutrient stoichiometry, and soil abiotic factors in driving belowground biodiversity across 16 soil chronosequences (from centuries to millennia) spanning a wide range of globally distributed ecosystem types. Changes in belowground biodiversity during pedogenesis followed two main patterns. In lower-productivity ecosystems (i.e., drier and colder), increases in belowground biodiversity tracked increases in plant cover. In more productive ecosystems (i.e., wetter and warmer), increased acidification during pedogenesis was associated with declines in belowground biodiversity. Changes in the diversity of bacteria, fungi, protists, and invertebrates with pedogenesis were strongly and positively correlated worldwide, highlighting that belowground biodiversity shares similar ecological drivers as soils and ecosystems develop. In general, temporal changes in aboveground plant diversity and belowground biodiversity were not correlated, challenging the common perception that belowground biodiversity should follow similar patterns to those of plant diversity during ecosystem development. Taken together, our findings provide evidence that ecological patterns in belowground biodiversity are predictable across major globally distributed ecosystem types and suggest that shifts in plant cover and soil acidification during ecosystem development are associated with changes in belowground biodiversity over centuries to millennia.

16 August 2016 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMadhavi Kakumanu
Madhavi Kakumanu
ARAlison M. Reeves
Alison M. Reeves
TATroy D. Anderson
Troy D. Anderson
RRRichard R. Rodrigues
Richard R. Rodrigues
MWMark A. Williams
Mark A. Williams
Honey bees (Apis mellifera) are the primary pollinators of major horticultural crops. Over the last few decades, a substantial decline in honey bees and their colonies have been reported. While a plethora of factors could contribute to the putative decline, pathogens and pesticides are common concerns that draw attention. In addition to potential direct effects on honey bees, indirect pesticide effects could include alteration of essential gut microbial communities and symbionts that are important to honey bee health (e.g. immune system). The primary objective of this study was to determine the microbiome associated with honey bees exposed to commonly used in-hive pesticides: coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate and chlorothalonil. Treatments were replicated at three independent locations near Blacksburg Virginia, and included a no-pesticide amended control at each location. The microbiome was characterized through pyrosequencing of V2-V3 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS region. Pesticide exposure significantly affected the structure of bacterial but not fungal communities. The bee bacteriome, similar to other studies, was dominated by sequences derived from Bacilli, Actinobacteria, α-, β-, γ-proteobacteria. The fungal community sequences were dominated by Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes. The Multi-response permutation procedures (MRPP) and subsequent Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) analysis indicated that chlorothalonil caused significant change to the structure and functional potential of the honey bee gut bacterial community relative to control. Putative genes for oxidative phosphorylation, for example, increased while sugar metabolism and peptidase potential declined in the microbiome of chlorothalonil exposed bees. The results of this field-based study suggest the potential for pesticide induced changes to the honey bee gut microbiome that warrant further investigation.


13 June 2013 in Molecular Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KJKamlesh Jangid
Kamlesh Jangid
WWWilliam B. Whitman
William B. Whitman
LCLeo M. Condron
Leo M. Condron
Benjamin L TurnerBenjamin L Turner
Benjamin L Turner
MWMark A. Williams
Mark A. Williams