Jiaqiang Du

Dr. Jiaqiang Du


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2019 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JDJiaqiang Du
Jiaqiang Du
QFQing Fu
Qing Fu
SFShifeng Fang
Shifeng Fang
JWJinhua Wu
Jinhua Wu
PHPing He
Ping He
ZQZhanjun Quan
Zhanjun Quan

9 December 2019 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JDJiaqiang Du
Jiaqiang Du
ZQZhanjun Quan
Zhanjun Quan
SFShifeng Fang
Shifeng Fang
CLChengcheng Liu
Chengcheng Liu
JWJinhua Wu
Jinhua Wu
QFQing Fu
Qing Fu

21 December 2015 in Environmental Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJiaqiang Du
Jiaqiang Du
CZChenxi Zhao
Chenxi Zhao
JSJianmin Shu
Jianmin Shu
AJAhati Jiaerheng
Ahati Jiaerheng
XYXinjie Yuan
Xinjie Yuan
PHPing He
Ping He
Understanding the dynamics of vegetation system change is often limited by relatively brief data sequences and the shortage of comparable analyses of variation over longer periods. In this study, GIMMS NDVI and MODIS NDVI datasets were integrated to establish a consistent NDVI time series from 1982 to 2012 on vegetation of the Tibetan Plateau in China. The spatiotemporal patterns of change in seasonal NDVI and their linkage with climatic variables were analyzed at regional and pixel scales over 14 periods ranging from 18 to 31 years and beginning in 1982. On a regional scale, positive trends of growing season and seasonal NDVI were observed during the 14 periods, and the increases were statistically significant for growing season NDVI during all periods, and for summer and autumn NDVI during only the last four and the last two periods, respectively. The rates of NDVI increase in growing season and spring significantly decreased over the 14 periods. NDVI rates slightly decrease in summer and significantly increase in autumn. At a pixel scale, areas with significant greening or significant browning significantly increased over the 14 periods during the growth season and during all seasons except spring, in which the proportion of vegetated area with greening rapidly decreased. Temperature was the primary climatic driver for the observed vegetation changes during multiple periods while precipitation and sunshine duration had significant impacts on vegetation growth only in limited parts of the study area or during spring. Vegetation growth response to climate change varied across seasons and regions. Trend analysis during the multiple nested time series provides a better understanding of NDVI dynamics and may help to forecast future changes. Spring NDVI is likely to continue decreasing, autumn NDVI will continue increasing, and the magnitude of the NDVI increase during growing season will decline in the future.

6 July 2022 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYangchengsi Zhang
Yangchengsi Zhang
JDJiaqiang Du
Jiaqiang Du
Long GuoLong Guo
Long Guo
SFShifeng Fang
Shifeng Fang
JZJing Zhang
Jing Zhang
Lijuan LiLijuan Li
Lijuan Li

4 August 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BSbingqing Sun
bingqing Sun
JDJiaqiang Du
Jiaqiang Du
FCFangfang Chong
Fangfang Chong
Lijuan LiLijuan Li
Lijuan Li
XZXiaoqian Zhu
Xiaoqian Zhu
JMJialin Mao
Jialin Mao
The accurate estimation of a regional ecosystem’s carbon storage and the exploration of its spatial distribution and influencing factors are of great significance for ecosystem carbon sink function enhancements and management. Using the Yellow River Basin as the study area, we assessed the changes in regional terrestrial ecosystem carbon storage through geographically weighted regression modeling based on a large number of measured sample sites, explored the main influencing factors through geographic probe analysis, and predicted the carbon sequestration potentials under different scenarios from 2030 to 2050. The results showed that (1) the total carbon storage in the Yellow River Basin in 2020 was about 8.84 × 109 t. Above-ground biological carbon storage, below-ground biological carbon storage, and soil carbon storage accounted for 6.39%, 5.07%, and 89.70% of the total ecosystem carbon storage, respectively. From 2000 to 2020, the carbon storage in the basin showed a trend in decreasing and then increasing, and the carbon storage in the west was larger than in the east and larger in the south than in the north. (2) Forest ecosystem was the main contributor to the increase in carbon storage in the Yellow River Basin. Elevation, temperature, and precipitation were the main factors influencing the spatial pattern of carbon storage. (3) The ecological conservation scenario had the best carbon gain effect among the four future development scenarios, and appropriate ecological conservation policies could be formulated based on this scenario in the future to help achieve the goals of carbon sequestration and sink increase.

14 March 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YZYangchengsi Zhang
Yangchengsi Zhang
JDJiaqiang Du
Jiaqiang Du
Long GuoLong Guo
Long Guo
ZSZhilu Sheng
Zhilu Sheng
JWJinhua Wu
Jinhua Wu
JZJing Zhang
Jing Zhang
Accurate estimation of the water conservation is of great significance for ecological red line planning. The water conservation of the Yellow River Basin has a vital influence on the development of the environment and the supply of ecological services in China. However, the existing methods used to estimate water conservation have many disadvantages, such as requiring numerous parameters, a complex calculation model, and using data that is often difficult acquire. It is often hard to provide sufficiently precise parameters and data, resulting in a large amount of calculation time and the difficulties in the study of large scale and long time series. In this study, a time series of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was applied to estimate water conservation in two aspects using the idea of wholeness and stratification, respectively. The overall fitting results can explain nearly 30% of the water conservation by partial least squares regression and nearly 50% of it by a support vector machine. However, the results of a stratified simulation showed that water conservation and the NDVI have a certain stratified heterogeneity among different ecosystem types. The optimal fitting result was achieved in a water/wetland ecosystem with the highest coefficient of determination (R2P) of 0.768 by the stratified support vector machine (SVM) model, followed by the forest and grassland ecosystem (both R2P of 0.698). The spatial mapping results showed that this method was most suitable for grassland ecosystem, followed by forest ecosystem. According to the results generated using the NDVI time series data, it is feasible to complete a spatial simulation of water conservation. This research can provide a reference for calculating regional or large-scale water conservation and in ecological red line planning.