Hospital discharge: What are the problems, information needs and objectives of community pharmacists? A mixed method approach

Background: One-third of older inpatients experience adverse drug events (ADEs), which increase their mortality, morbidity, and health care use and costs. In particular, antithrombotic drugs are among the most at-risk medications for this population. Reporting systems have been implemented at the national, regional, and provider levels to monitor ADEs and design prevention strategies. Owing to their well-known limitations, automated detection technologies based on electronic medical records (EMRs) are being developed to routinely detect or predict ADEs. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate an automated detection tool for monitoring antithrombotic-related ADEs using EMRs from 4 large Swiss hospitals. We aim to assess cumulative incidences of hemorrhages and thromboses in older inpatients associated with the prescription of antithrombotic drugs, identify triggering factors, and propose improvements for clinical practice. Methods: This project is a multicenter, cross-sectional study based on 2015 to 2016 EMR data from 4 large hospitals in Switzerland: Lausanne, Geneva, and Zürich university hospitals, and Baden Cantonal Hospital. We have included inpatients aged ≥65 years who stayed at 1 of the 4 hospitals during 2015 or 2016, received at least one antithrombotic drug during their stay, and signed or were not opposed to a general consent for participation in research. First, clinical experts selected a list of relevant antithrombotic drugs along with their side effects, risks, and confounding factors. Second, administrative, clinical, prescription, and laboratory data available in the form of free text and structured data were extracted from study participants’ EMRs. Third, several automated rule-based and machine learning–based algorithms are being developed, allowing for the identification of hemorrhage and thromboembolic events and their triggering factors from the extracted information. Finally, we plan to validate the developed detection tools (one per ADE type) through manual medical record review. Performance metrics for assessing internal validity will comprise the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Results: After accounting for the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we will include 34,522 residents aged ≥65 years. The data will be analyzed in 2022, and the research project will run until the end of 2022 to mid-2023. Conclusions: This project will allow for the introduction of measures to improve safety in prescribing antithrombotic drugs, which today remain among the drugs most involved in ADEs. The findings will be implemented in clinical practice using indicators of adverse events for risk management and training for health care professionals; the tools and methodologies developed will be disseminated for new research in this field. The increased performance of natural language processing as an important complement to structured data will bring existing tools to another level of efficiency in the detection of ADEs. Currently, such systems are unavailable in Switzerland. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40456

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Opioid prescriptions have increased in Switzerland, even though current guidelines warn of their harms. If opioids for postoperative analgesia are not tapered before hospital discharge, patients are at risk of adverse events such as constipation, drowsiness, dependence, tolerance and withdrawal. The aim of this study was to investigate and quantify the potential association between opioids prescribed at discharge from hospital and rehospitalisation. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study using routinely collected electronic health records from a Swiss public acute hospital. Cases were patients aged 65 years or older admitted between November 2014 and December 2018, with documented opioid administration on the day of discharge and rehospitalisation within 18 or 30 days after discharge. Each case was matched to five controls for age, sex, year of hospitalisation and Charlson Comorbidity Index. We calculated odds ratios for 18-day and 30-day rehospitalisation based on exposure to opioids using a conditional logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders. Secondary analyses included stratifications into morphine-equivalent doses of <50 mg, 50–89 mg and ≥90 mg, and co-prescriptions of gabapentinoids and benzodiazepines. RESULTS: Of 22,471 included patients, 3144 rehospitalisations were identified, of which 1698 were 18-day rehospitalisations and 1446 were 30-day rehospitalisations. Documented opioid administration on the day of discharge was associated with 30-day rehospitalisation after adjustment for confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.48; 95% CI 1.25–1.75, p 50 mg were rare. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving opioids on the day of discharge were 48% more likely to be readmitted to hospital within 30 days. Clinicians should aim to discontinue opioids started in hospital before discharge if possible. Patients receiving an opioid prescription should be educated and monitored as part of opioid stewardship programmes.

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and drug–drug interactions (DDIs) in older and younger prisoners, and compared if age group is associated with risks of polypharmacy and DDIs.Design/methodology/approach: For 380 prisoners from Switzerland (190 were 49 years and younger; 190 were 50 years and older), data concerning their medication use were gathered. MediQ identified if interactions of two or more substances could lead to potentially adverse DDI. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and generalised linear mixed models.Findings: On average, older prisoners took 3.8 medications, while younger prisoners took 2.1 medications. Number of medications taken on one reference day was higher by a factor of 2.4 for older prisoners when compared to younger prisoners (p= 0.002). The odds of polypharmacy was significantly higher for older than for younger prisoners (>=5 medications: odds ratio = 5.52,p= 0.035). Age group analysis indicated that for potentially adverse DDI there was no significant difference (odds ratio = 0.94;p= 0.879). However, when controlling for the number of medication, the risk of adverse DDI was higher in younger than older prisoners, but the result was not significant.Originality/value: Older prisoners are at a higher risk of polypharmacy but their risk for potentially adverse DDI is not significantly different from that of younger prisoners. Special clinical attention must be given to older prisoners who are at risk for polypharmacy. Careful medication management is also important for younger prisoners who are at risk of very complex drug therapies.

Background: Readmission prediction models have been developed and validated for targeted in-hospital preventive interventions. We aimed to externally validate the Potentially Avoidable Readmission-Risk Score (PAR-Risk Score), a 12-items prediction model for internal medicine patients with a convenient scoring system, for our local patient cohort.Methods: A cohort study using electronic health record data from the internal medicine ward of a Swiss tertiary teaching hospital was conducted. The individual PAR-Risk Score values were calculated for each patient. Univariable logistic regression was used to predict potentially avoidable readmissions (PARs), as identified by the SQLape algorithm. For additional analyses, patients were stratified intolow,medium, andhighrisk according to tertiles based on the PAR-Risk Score. Statistical associations between predictor variables and PAR as outcome were assessed using both univariable and multivariable logistic regression.Results: The final dataset consisted of 5,985 patients. Of these, 340 patients (5.7%) experienced a PAR. The overall PAR-Risk Score showed rather poor discriminatory power (C statistic 0.605, 95%-CI 0.575–0.635). When using stratified groups (low,medium,high), patients in thehigh-risk group were at statistically significant higher odds (OR 2.63, 95%-CI 1.33–5.18) of being readmitted within 30 days compared tolowrisk patients. Multivariable logistic regression identified previous admission within six months, anaemia, heart failure, and opioids to be significantly associated with PAR in this patient cohort.Conclusion: This external validation showed a limited overall performance of the PAR-Risk Score, although higher scores were associated with an increased risk for PAR and patients in thehigh-risk group were at significantly higher odds of being readmitted within 30 days. This study highlights the importance of externally validating prediction models.