Ibrahim Elsebaie

Dr. Ibrahim Elsebaie

Civil Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Ar Riyāḑ, Saudi Arabia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2012 in Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IEIbrahim Elsebaie
Ibrahim Elsebaie
Intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) relationship of rainfall amounts is one of the most commonly used tools in water resources engineering for planning, design and operation of water resources projects. The objective of this research is to derive IDF relationship of rainfall at Najran and Hafr Albatin regions in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). These relationships are useful in the design of urban drainage works, e.g. storm sewers, culverts and other hydraulic structures. Two common frequency analysis techniques were used to develop the IDF relationship from rainfall data of these regions. These techniques are: Gumbel and the Log Pearson Type III distribution (LPT III).An equation for estimating rainfall intensity for each region was derived using both techniques. The results obtained using Gumbel distribution are slightly higher than the results obtained using the LPT III distribution. Rainfall intensities obtained from these two methods showed good agreement with results from previous studies on some parts of the study area. The chi-square goodness-of-fit test was used to determine the best fit probability distribution. The parameters of the IDF equations and coefficient of correlation for different return periods (2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100) are calculated by using non-linear multiple regression method. The results obtained showed that in all the cases the correlation coefficient is very high indicating the goodness of fit of the formulae to estimate IDF curves in the region of interest

26 February 2023 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IEIbrahim Elsebaie
Ibrahim Elsebaie
AKAtef Q. Kawara
Atef Q. Kawara
AAAli Alnahit
Ali Alnahit
Flood risk mapping is vital in watershed management and planning, especially in reducing flood damages. In this study, a flood risk map was developed for the Wadi Al-Lith watershed (Saudi Arabia) by combining geographic information system techniques with a multi-criteria decision-making method known as the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Several factors were investigated in the study, including elevation, slope, topographic wetness index, drainage density, rainfall, soil and land use, and land cover. The watershed was divided into five regions: very high, high, moderate, low, and very low flooding danger areas. The results showed that 35.86% of the total watershed area is under high and very high flood risks, while 26.85% of the total area is under a moderate flood risk. Less than 38% of the total watershed area was under a low flooding risk. The results of the developed model were validated with the flooding event that occurred on 23 November 2018 in the study area. The model was also compared with the flood mapping of the 100-year return period generated by the HEC-RAS software. Both the developed model and the HEC-RAS software showed similar results. The findings demonstrated that the developed model could be used to develop flood risk maps, especially in watersheds that experience scarcity and shortages in the short-interval rainfall measurements and the stream flow gauges (e.g., Wadi Al-Lith watershed and other watersheds in Saudi Arabia). Additionally, the obtained results can provide helpful knowledge for the policy- and decision-makers to make the right decisions regarding the effectiveness of the protective structures of the study area against the risk of flash flooding in the future.

13 March 2022 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAtef Q. Kawara
Atef Q. Kawara
IEIbrahim Elsebaie
Ibrahim Elsebaie
Realistic runoff estimates are crucial for the accurate design of stormwater drainage systems, particularly in developing urban catchments which are prone to overland flow and street inundation following extreme rainstorms. This paper derives new intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves for the Yalamlam area in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. These curves were obtained based on daily rainfall measurements and, in some short durations, across the entire study area over 30 years. The study is based on applying two distributions—the Log-Pearson type III and Gumbel—to estimate the average rainfall for the different return periods. The results show that there are slight differences between the Log-Pearson type III distribution and the Gumbel distribution, so the average parameters were used to construct the IDF curve in the Yalamlam area. The maximum daily rainfall was converted into sub-daily intervals using two methods and compared with the observed value. The new ratios were calculated using the converting rainfall from daily to sub-daily. These ratios are recommended for application in the Yalamlam area if there are no short-time-interval data available. The following ratios for 1-day rainfall were proposed: 0.37, 0.40, 0.46, 0.53, 0.61, 0.66, 0.70, 0.76, 0.80, and 0.87 for 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, and 12 h rainfall, respectively. The developed IDF curve for the Yalamlam district was built based on the daily and sub-daily observed data.

5 May 2024 in Applied Water Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAtef Q. Kawara
Atef Q. Kawara
IEIbrahim Elsebaie
Ibrahim Elsebaie
AAAli Alnahit
Ali Alnahit
The management of groundwater resources is crucial in arid and semi-arid regions such as Al-Lith Basin, and therefore, the identification of suitable areas for groundwater recharge is important in solving the problem of water scarcity and ensuring the long-term sustainability of aquifers. In this study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique, in conjunction with GIS, was applied to locate potential zones for groundwater recharge in the Al-Lith basin. The research methodology includes collecting the essential data, including lineament density, slope, rainfall, drainage density, LU/LC, soil, elevation, and TWI. AHP is used to assign relative weights to different qualities, considering their significance in influencing groundwater recharge. The ArcGIS was employed to process and analyze the weighted layers, which resulted in the creation of a comprehensive map illustrating the potential for groundwater recharge. The study results suggested that the Al-Lith Subbasin has several zones that exhibit different levels of groundwater recharge capability. The results obtained from this study indicated that 12.83% of the basin area has significant groundwater recharge potential zones (GWPZ), ranging from high to very high levels. The groundwater recharge potential zones in the basin are categorized as very poor to poor, covering 19.4% of the area, while the moderate groundwater recharge potential zones represent 67.77% of the basin area. The groundwater protection zones were validated using 19 wells distributed across the basin. The validation findings indicate there is an overlap between the GWPZ classes and the wells in the specified location. Overall, the findings of this study can enhance groundwater resource management and inform policy development for targeted interventions aimed at enhancing groundwater recharge.

24 June 2025 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IEIbrahim Elsebaie
Ibrahim Elsebaie
AKAtef Q. Kawara
Atef Q. Kawara
RARaied Saad Alharabi
Raied Saad Alharabi
AAAli Alnahit
Ali Alnahit
Accurate rainfall data with good spatial–temporal distribution remain a challenge worldwide, particularly in arid regions such as western Saudi Arabia, where variability critically influences water resource management and flood mitigation. This study evaluates five satellite-based rainfall products—GPM, GPCP, CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CDR and PERSIANN—against observed monthly rainfall at 28-gauge stations, using the correlation coefficient (CC), root mean square error (RMSE), relative bias (RB) and mean absolute error (MAE). Among uncorrected products, GPM achieved the highest mean CC (0.52), and lowest RMSE (17.0 mm) and MAE (9.18 mm) compared with CC = 0.39 (RMSE 19.9 mm) for GPCP, CC = 0.20 (RMSE 21.6 mm) for CHIRPS, CC = 0.43 (RMSE 19.2 mm) for PERSIANN-CDR and CC = 0.26 (RMSE 57.3 mm) for PERSIANN. Four bias correction methods—linear scaling, nonlinear adjustment, quantile mapping and artificial neural networks (ANN)—were applied. The ANN reduced GPM’s RMSE by 19% to 13.8 mm, increased CC to 0.59, lowered RB to 2.5% and achieved an MAE of 6.89 mm. These results demonstrate that GPM, particularly when bias-corrected via ANN, provides a dependable rainfall dataset for hydrological modeling and flood risk assessment in arid environments.

27 December 2021 in Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IEIbrahim Elsebaie
Ibrahim Elsebaie
MAMoahmed El Alfy
Moahmed El Alfy
AKAtef Q. Kawara
Atef Q. Kawara
In arid areas, flashflood water management is a major concern due to arid climate ambiguity. The examining and derivation of intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves in an urban arid area under a variety of terrain patterns and climatic changes is anticipated. Several flood events have been reported in the Al-Lith region of western Saudi Arabia that took away many lives and caused disruption in services and trade. To find and examine the extremities and IDF curves, daily rainfall data from 1966 to 2018 is used. The IDF curves are created for a variety of return periods and climate scenarios in three terrain variabilities. This research examines various distributions to estimate the maximum rainfall for several metrological stations with varying return periods and terrain conditions. Three main zones are identified based on ground elevation variability and IDF distributions from upstream in the eastern mountainous area to downstream in the western coastal area. These IDF curves can be used to identify vulnerable hotspot areas in arid areas such as the Wadi AL-Lith, and flood mitigation steps can be suggested to minimize flood risk.