Gary Troia

Dr. Gary Troia

Michigan State University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 April 2012 in Reading and Writing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Gary TroiaGary Troia
Gary Troia
AHAllen G. Harbaugh
Allen G. Harbaugh
RSRebecca K. Shankland
Rebecca K. Shankland
Kimberly WolbersKimberly Wolbers
Kimberly Wolbers
ALAnn M. Lawrence
Ann M. Lawrence

1 January 1999 in Reading Research Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Gary TroiaGary Troia
Gary Troia

2 January 2012 in Reading & Writing Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gary TroiaGary Troia
Gary Troia
RSRebecca K. Shankland
Rebecca K. Shankland
Kimberly WolbersKimberly Wolbers
Kimberly Wolbers
This article reviews research on motivation in the academic domain of writing situated within a social cognitive perspective. First we summarize major findings related to 4 theorized components of human motivation—self-efficacy beliefs or perceived competence, mastery and performance goal orientations, task interest and value, and attributions for success and failure. For each component we also offer general instructional recommendations gleaned from the literature. Next we discuss how these components play a role in writing motivation, with particular emphasis on self-efficacy for writing skills versus writing tasks. Then we present findings from studies that have examined the motivational characteristics of individuals who struggle with writing, including those with disabilities, and interventions designed to enhance motivation to write. Finally, we offer suggestions for future research in writing motivation.

1 July 2002 in Journal of Learning Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Gary TroiaGary Troia
Gary Troia
SGSteve Graham
Steve Graham
This study examined the effectiveness of a highly explicit, teacher-directed instructional routine used to teach three planning strategies for writing to fourth and fifth graders with learning disabilities. In comparison to peers who received process writing instruction, children who were taught the three planning strategies—goal setting, brainstorming, and organizing—spent more time planning stories in advance of writing and produced stories that were qualitatively better. One month after the end of instruction, students who had been taught the strategies not only maintained their advantage in story quality but also produced longer stories than those produced by their peers who were taught process writing. However, the highly explicit, teacher-directed strategy instructional routine used in this study did not promote transfer to an uninstructed genre, persuasive essay writing. These findings are discussed in terms of their relevance to effective writing instruction practices for students with learning disabilities.


1 August 2000 in Topics in Language Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSteve Graham
Steve Graham
KHKaren R. Harris
Karen R. Harris
Gary TroiaGary Troia
Gary Troia