Vanessa Lucieer

Prof. Vanessa Lucieer

Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2010 in Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMM.A. McArthur
M.A. McArthur
BBBrendan Brooke
Brendan Brooke
RPRachel Przeslawski
Rachel Przeslawski
DRD.A. Ryan
D.A. Ryan
Vanessa LucieerVanessa Lucieer
Vanessa Lucieer
LRL.C. Radke
L.C. Radke

9 August 2016 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vincent LecoursVincent Lecours
Vincent Lecours
MDMargaret Dolan
Margaret Dolan
AMAaron Micallef
Aaron Micallef
Vanessa LucieerVanessa Lucieer
Vanessa Lucieer
Geomorphometry, the science of quantitative terrain characterization, has traditionally focused on the investigation of terrestrial landscapes. However, the dramatic increase in the availability of digital bathymetric data and the increasing ease by which geomorphometry can be investigated using geographic information systems (GISs) and spatial analysis software has prompted interest in employing geomorphometric techniques to investigate the marine environment. Over the last decade or so, a multitude of geomorphometric techniques (e.g. terrain attributes, feature extraction, automated classification) have been applied to characterize seabed terrain from the coastal zone to the deep sea. Geomorphometric techniques are, however, not as varied, nor as extensively applied, in marine as they are in terrestrial environments. This is at least partly due to difficulties associated with capturing, classifying, and validating terrain characteristics underwater. There is, nevertheless, much common ground between terrestrial and marine geomorphometry applications and it is important that, in developing marine geomorphometry, we learn from experiences in terrestrial studies. However, not all terrestrial solutions can be adopted by marine geomorphometric studies since the dynamic, four-dimensional (4-D) nature of the marine environment causes its own issues throughout the geomorphometry workflow. For instance, issues with underwater positioning, variations in sound velocity in the water column affecting acoustic-based mapping, and our inability to directly observe and measure depth and morphological features on the seafloor are all issues specific to the application of geomorphometry in the marine environment. Such issues fuel the need for a dedicated scientific effort in marine geomorphometry.This review aims to highlight the relatively recent growth of marine geomorphometry as a distinct discipline, and offers the first comprehensive overview of marine geomorphometry to date. We address all the five main steps of geomorphometry, from data collection to the application of terrain attributes and features. We focus on how these steps are relevant to marine geomorphometry and also highlight differences and similarities from terrestrial geomorphometry. We conclude with recommendations and reflections on the future of marine geomorphometry. To ensure that geomorphometry is used and developed to its full potential, there is a need to increase awareness of (1) marine geomorphometry amongst scientists already engaged in terrestrial geomorphometry, and of (2) geomorphometry as a science amongst marine scientists with a wide range of backgrounds and experiences.

15 September 2015 in Marine Ecology Progress Series
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vincent LecoursVincent Lecours
Vincent Lecours
RDRodolphe Devillers
Rodolphe Devillers
DSDavid C. Schneider
David C. Schneider
Vanessa LucieerVanessa Lucieer
Vanessa Lucieer
CBCraig Brown
Craig Brown
EEEvan N. Edinger
Evan N. Edinger

1 January 2013 in Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vanessa LucieerVanessa Lucieer
Vanessa Lucieer
NHNicole A. Hill
Nicole A. Hill
NBNeville S. Barrett
Neville S. Barrett
SNScott Nichol
Scott Nichol

1 March 2017 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vincent LecoursVincent Lecours
Vincent Lecours
RDRodolphe Devillers
Rodolphe Devillers
ASAlvin E. Simms
Alvin E. Simms
Vanessa LucieerVanessa Lucieer
Vanessa Lucieer
CBCraig Brown
Craig Brown

21 December 2007 in International Journal of Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vanessa LucieerVanessa Lucieer
Vanessa Lucieer
This research presents an object‐oriented technique for habitat classification at different segmentation levels based on the use of imagery from an Edgetech 272 side scan sonar. We investigate the success of object parameters such as shape and size as well as texture in discriminating reef from sand habitat. The results are evaluated using traditional digitization, based on visual assessment of the sidescan imagery, and video transects. Whereas the application of traditional pixel‐based classification results in a pixelized (salt and pepper) representation of habitat distribution, the object‐based classification technique results in habitat objects (raster or vector). The object‐oriented classification results are cross‐validated using confusion matrices in image classification software and error matrices from underwater video transects showing an overall accuracy of 80% based on two classes within the image at three segmentation levels and an overall accuracy of 60% based on three classes at two segmentation levels. This is compared with the digitized layer accuracy of 81% for two classes and 72% for three classes, and this demonstrates the successful application of object‐oriented methods for habitat mapping. This technique retains spatially discrete habitat pattern information in a classified vector shape file with methods that are automated, repeatable, objective, and capable of processing many sidescan records in a more efficient manner.