Tetyana Romanova

Prof. Dr. Tetyana Romanova


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 July 2015 in Journal of Global Optimization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YSY. Stoyan
Y. Stoyan
APA. Pankratov
A. Pankratov
TRTetyana Romanova
Tetyana Romanova

7 November 2008 in Annals of Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJ. Bennell
J. Bennell
GSG. Scheithauer
G. Scheithauer
YSY. Stoyan
Y. Stoyan
TRTetyana Romanova
Tetyana Romanova

1 May 2016 in Journal of the Operational Research Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YSYuriy Stoyan
Yuriy Stoyan
APAlexander Pankratov
Alexander Pankratov
TRTetyana Romanova
Tetyana Romanova

15 October 2025 in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSergiy Plankovskyy
Sergiy Plankovskyy
Yevgen TsegelnykYevgen Tsegelnyk
Yevgen Tsegelnyk
NSNataliia Shyshko
Nataliia Shyshko
Igor LitvinchevIgor Litvinchev
Igor Litvinchev
TRTetyana Romanova
Tetyana Romanova
JVJosé-Manuel Velarde-Cantú
José-Manuel Velarde-Cantú
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) represent a transformative approach to solving partial differential equation (PDE)-based boundary value problems by embedding physical laws into the learning process, addressing challenges such as non-physical solutions and data scarcity, which are inherent in traditional neural networks. This review analyzes critical challenges in PINN development, focusing on loss function design, geometric information integration, and their application in engineering modeling. We explore advanced strategies for constructing loss functions—including adaptive weighting, energy-based, and variational formulations—that enhance optimization stability and ensure physical consistency across multiscale and multiphysics problems. We emphasize geometry-aware learning through analytical representations—signed distance functions (SDFs), phi-functions, and R-functions—with complementary strengths: SDFs enable precise local boundary enforcement, whereas phi/R capture global multi-body constraints in irregular domains; in practice, hybrid use is effective for engineering problems. We also examine adaptive collocation sampling, domain decomposition, and hard-constraint mechanisms for boundary conditions to improve convergence and accuracy and discuss integration with commercial CAE via hybrid schemes that couple PINNs with classical solvers (e.g., FEM) to boost efficiency and reliability. Finally, we consider emerging paradigms—Physics-Informed Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks (PIKANs) and operator-learning frameworks (DeepONet, Fourier Neural Operator)—and outline open directions in standardized benchmarks, computational scalability, and multiphysics/multi-fidelity modeling for digital twins and design optimization.

6 December 2019 in International Journal of Production Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TRTetyana Romanova
Tetyana Romanova
YSYuri Stoyan
Yuri Stoyan
APAlexandr Pankratov
Alexandr Pankratov
ILIgor Litvinchev
Igor Litvinchev
KAKonstantin Avramov
Konstantin Avramov
JBJulia Bennell
Julia Bennell
The paper studies a layout problem of variable number of ellipses with variable sizes placed into an arbitrary disconnected polygonal domain with maximum packing factor. The ellipses can be continuously translated and rotated. Restrictions on the dimensions of the ellipses are taken into account. Tools for the mathematical modelling of placement constraints (distance constraints between ellipses and containment of ellipses into a polygonal domain) using the phi-function technique are introduced. The tools make it possible to formulate the layout problem in the form of MIP model that is equivalent to a sequence of nonlinear programming subproblems. We develop a new solution algorithm that involves the feasible starting point algorithm and optimisation procedure to search for efficient locally optimal solutions of the layout problem. This algorithm can be used in the design of parts for «support-free» additive manufacturing, taking into account the conditions for its static/ dynamic strength. Results of the algorithm implementation for a topologically optimised flat part with the analysis of a stress state are provided.

1 January 2020 in Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YSYuriy Stoyan
Yuriy Stoyan
GYGeorgiy Yaskov
Georgiy Yaskov
TRTetyana Romanova
Tetyana Romanova
ILIgor Litvinchev
Igor Litvinchev
SYSergey Yakovlev
Sergey Yakovlev
JCJosé Manuel Velarde Cantú
José Manuel Velarde Cantú
In this paper an optimized multidimensional hyperspheres packing problem (HPP) is considered for a bounded container. Additional constraints, such as prohibited zones in the container or minimal allowable distances between spheres can also be taken into account. Containers bounded by hyper- (spheres, cylinders, planes) are considered. Placement constraints (non-intersection, containment and distant conditions) are formulated using the phi-function technique. A mathematical model of HPP is constructed and analyzed. In terms of the general typology for cutting & packing problems, two classes of HPP are considered: open dimension problem (ODP) and knapsack problem (KP). Various solution strategies for HPP are considered depending on: a) objective function type, b) problem dimension, c) metric characteristics of hyperspheres (congruence, radii distribution and values), d) container's shape; e) prohibited zones in the container and/or minimal allowable distances. A solution approach is proposed based on multistart strategies, nonlinear programming techniques, greedy and branch-and-bound algorithms, statistical optimization and homothetic transformations, as well as decomposition techniques. A general methodology to solve HPP is suggested. Computational results for benchmark and new instances are presented.