Clemens M. Van De Wiel

Dr. Clemens M. Van De Wiel


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

44Years (1983-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 1997 in Molecular Breeding
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CJC.J. Jones
C.J. Jones
KEK.J. Edwards
K.J. Edwards
SCS. Castaglione
S. Castaglione
Mark O. WinfieldMark O. Winfield
Mark O. Winfield
FSF. Sala
F. Sala
AKA. Karp
A. Karp

19 May 2014 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKChristos Kissoudis
Christos Kissoudis
CWClemens M. Van De Wiel
Clemens M. Van De Wiel
RVRichard G. F. Visser
Richard G. F. Visser
GLGerard Van Der Linden
Gerard Van Der Linden
Plants growing in their natural habitats are often challenged simultaneously by multiple stress factors, both abiotic and biotic. Research has so far been limited to responses to individual stresses, and understanding of adaptation to combinatorial stress is limited, but indicative of non-additive interactions. Omics data analysis and functional characterization of individual genes has revealed a convergence of signalling pathways for abiotic and biotic stress adaptation. Taking into account that most data originate from imposition of individual stress factors, this review summarizes these findings in a physiological context, following the pathogenesis timeline and highlighting potential differential interactions occurring between abiotic and biotic stress signalling across the different cellular compartments and at the whole plant level. Potential effects of abiotic stress on resistance components such as extracellular receptor proteins, R-genes and systemic acquired resistance will be elaborated, as well as crosstalk at the levels of hormone, ROS and redox signalling. Breeding targets and strategies are proposed focusing on either manipulation and deployment of individual common regulators such as transcription factors or pyramiding of non- (negatively) interacting components such as R-genes with abiotic stress resistance genes. We propose that dissection of broad spectrum stress tolerance conferred by priming chemicals may provide an insight on stress cross regulation and additional candidate genes for improving crop performance under combined stress. Validation of the proposed strategies in lab and field experiments is a first step towards the goal of achieving tolerance to combinatorial stress in crops.

1 May 2016 in Trends in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJan Schaart
Jan Schaart
CWClemens M. Van De Wiel
Clemens M. Van De Wiel
LLLambertus A.P. Lotz
Lambertus A.P. Lotz
MSMarinus Smulders
Marinus Smulders

16 October 2015 in Euphytica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CWClemens M. Van De Wiel
Clemens M. Van De Wiel
CMClemens C. M.
Clemens C. M.
VLvan der Linden
van der Linden
CGC. Gerard
C. Gerard
OSOlga E. Scholten
Olga E. Scholten
Phosphorus (P) is often an important limiting factor for crop yields, but rock phosphate as fertilizer is a non-renewable resource and expected to become scarce in the future. High P input levels in agriculture have led to environmental problems. One of the ways to tackle these issues simultaneously is improving phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) of the crops through breeding. In this review, we describe plant architectural and physiological traits important for PUE. Subsequently, we discuss efficient methods of screening for PUE traits. We address targeted cultivation methods, including solid and hydroponic systems, as well as testing methods, such as image analysis systems, and biomass and photosynthesis measurements. Genetic variation for PUE traits has been assessed in many crops, and genetics of PUE has been studied by quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses and genome-wide association study. A number of genes involved in the plant’s response to low P have been characterized. These genes include transcription factors, and genes involved in signal transduction, hormonal pathways, sugar signalling, P saving metabolic pathways, and in P scavenging, including transporters and metabolites and/or ATP-ases mobilizing P in the soil. In addition, the role of microorganisms promoting PUE of plants, particularly arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is discussed. An overview is given of methods for selecting for optimal combinations of plant and fungal genotypes, and their genetics, incl. QTLs and genes involved. In conclusion, significant progress has been made in selecting for traits for PUE, developing systems for the difficult but highly relevant root phenotyping, and in identifying QTLs and genes involved.

1 January 1990 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBen Scheres
Ben Scheres
CWClemens M. Van De Wiel
Clemens M. Van De Wiel
AZAndrei Zalensky
Andrei Zalensky
BHBeatrix Horvath
Beatrix Horvath
Herman SpainkHerman Spaink
Herman Spaink
TBTon Bisseling
Ton Bisseling

1 August 1990 in The Plant Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BSB Scheres
B Scheres
FEF van Engelen
F van Engelen
EKE van der Knaap
E van der Knaap
CWClemens M. Van De Wiel
Clemens M. Van De Wiel
AKA van Kammen
A van Kammen
TBT Bisseling
T Bisseling
A set of cDNA clones have been characterized that represent early nodulin mRNAs from pea root nodules. By RNA transfer blot analyses, the different early nodulin mRNAs were found to vary in time course of appearance during the development of the indeterminate pea root nodule. In situ hybridization studies demonstrated that the transcripts were located in different zones, representing subsequent steps in development of the central tissue of the root nodule. ENOD12 transcripts were present in every cell of the invasion zone, whereas ENOD5, ENOD3, and ENOD14 transcripts were restricted to the infected cells in successive but partially overlapping zones of the central tissue. We conclude that the corresponding nodulin genes are expressed at subsequent developmental stages. The amino acid sequence derived from the nucleotide sequences of the cDNAs, in combination with the localization data, showed that ENOD5 is an arabinogalactan-like protein involved in the infection process, whereas ENOD3 and ENOD14 have a cysteine cluster suggesting that these are metal-binding proteins. Furthermore, we showed that there is a clear difference in the way Rhizobium induced the infection-related early nodulin genes ENOD5 and ENOD12. A factor acting over a long distance induced the ENOD12 gene, whereas a factor acting over a short distance activated the ENOD5 gene.