Understanding the packaging of DNA into chromatin has become a crucial aspect in the study of gene regulatory mechanisms. Heterochromatin establishment and maintenance dynamics have emerged as some of the main features involved in genome stability, cellular development, and diseases. The most extensively studied heterochromatin protein is HP1a. This protein has two main domains, namely the chromoshadow and the chromodomain, separated by a hinge region. Over the years, several works have taken on the task of identifying HP1a partners using different strategies. In this review, we focus on describing these interactions and the possible complexes and subcomplexes associated with this critical protein. Characterization of these complexes will help us to clearly understand the implications of the interactions of HP1a in heterochromatin maintenance, heterochromatin dynamics, and heterochromatin’s direct relationship to gene regulation and chromatin organization.

The human ATRX gene encodes hATRX, a chromatin-remodeling protein harboring an helicase/ATPase and ADD domains. The ADD domain has two zinc fingers that bind to histone tails and mediate hATRX binding to chromatin. dAtrx, the putative ATRX homolog in Drosophila melanogaster, has a conserved helicase/ATPase domain but lacks the ADD domain. A bioinformatic search of the Drosophila genome using the human ADD sequence allowed us to identify the CG8290 annotated gene, which encodes three ADD harboring- isoforms generated by alternative splicing. This Drosophila ADD domain is highly similar in structure and in the amino acids which mediate the histone tail contacts to the ADD domain of hATRX as shown by 3D modeling. Very recently the CG8290 annotated gene has been named dadd1. We show through pull-down and CoIP assays that the products of the dadd1 gene interact physically with dAtrx_L and HP1a and all of them mainly co-localize in the chromocenter, although euchromatic localization can also be observed through the chromosome arms. We confirm through ChIP analyses that these proteins are present in vivo in the same heterochromatic regions. The three isoforms are expressed throughout development. Flies carrying transheterozygous combinations of the dadd1 and atrx alleles are semi-viable and have different phenotypes including the appearance of melanotic masses. Interestingly, the dAdd1-b and c isoforms have extra domains, such as MADF, which suggest newly acquired functions of these proteins. These results strongly support that, in Drosophila, the atrx gene diverged and that the dadd1-encoded proteins participate with dAtrx in some cellular functions such as heterochromatin maintenance.

Background: dADD1 and dXNP proteins are the orthologs inDrosophila melanogasterof the ADD and SNF2 domains, respectively, of the ATRX vertebrate’s chromatin remodeler, they suppress position effect variegation phenotypes and participate in heterochromatin maintenance.Results: We performed a search in human cancer databases and found that ATRX protein levels were elevated in more than 4.4% of the samples analyzed. Using theDrosophilamodel, we addressed the effects of over and under-expression of dADD1 proteins in polytene cells. Elevated levels of dADD1 in fly tissues caused different phenotypes, such as chromocenter disruption and loss of banding pattern at the chromosome arms. Analyses of the heterochromatin maintenance protein HP1a, the dXNP ATPase and the histone post-translational modification H3K9me3 revealed changes in their chromatin localization accompanied by mild transcriptional defects of genes embedded in heterochromatic regions. Furthermore, the expression of heterochromatin embedded genes in nulldadd1organisms is lower than in the wild-type conditions.Conclusion: These data indicate that dADD1 overexpression induces chromatin changes, probably affecting the stoichiometry of HP1a containing complexes that lead to transcriptional and architectural changes. Our results place dADD1 proteins as important players in the maintenance of chromatin architecture and heterochromatic gene expression.

Replication timing is significantly correlated with gene expression and chromatin organization, changes dynamically during cell differentiation, and is altered in diseased states. Genome‐wide analysis of replication timing is performed in actively replicating cells by Repli‐seq. Current methods for Repli‐seq require cells to be fixed in large numbers. This is a barrier for sample types that are sensitive to fixation or are in very limited numbers. In this article, we outline optimized methods to process live cells and intact nuclei for Repli‐seq. Our protocol enables the processing of a smaller number of cells per sample and reduces processing time and sample loss while obtaining high‐quality data. Further, for samples that tend to form clumps and are difficult to dissociate into a single‐cell suspension, we also outline methods for isolation, staining, and processing of nuclei for Repli‐seq. The Repli‐seq data obtained from live cells and intact nuclei are comparable to those obtained from the standard protocols. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.Basic Protocol: Live cell isolation and stainingAlternate Protocol: Nuclei isolation and staining