Ann-Marie Pendrill

Prof. Ann-Marie Pendrill

Lund University

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

50Years (1977-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 October 2016 in European Journal of Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
David EagerDavid Eager
David Eager
Ann-Marie PendrillAnn-Marie Pendrill
Ann-Marie Pendrill
NRNina Reistad
Nina Reistad
The higher derivatives of motion are rarely discussed in the teaching of classical mechanics of rigid bodies; nevertheless, we experience the effect not only of acceleration, but also of jerk and snap. In this paper we will discuss the third and higher order derivatives of displacement with respect to time, using the trampolines and theme park roller coasters to illustrate this concept. We will also discuss the effects on the human body of different types of acceleration, jerk, snap and higher derivatives, and how they can be used in physics education to further enhance the learning and thus the understanding of classical mechanics concepts.

22 March 2023 in Physics Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BGBor Gregorcic
Bor Gregorcic
Ann-Marie PendrillAnn-Marie Pendrill
Ann-Marie Pendrill
We present a case study of a conversation between ourselves and an artificial intelligence-based chatbot ChatGPT. We asked the chatbot to respond to a basic physics question that will be familiar to most physics teachers: ‘A teddy bear is thrown into the air. What is its acceleration in the highest point?’ The chatbot’s responses, while linguistically quite advanced, were unreliable in their correctness and often full of contradictions. We then attempted to engage in Socratic dialogue with the chatbot to resolve the errors and contradictions, but with little success. We found that ChatGPT is not yet good enough to be used as a cheating tool for physics students or as a physics tutor. However, we found it quite reliable in generating incorrect responses on which physics teachers could train assessment of student responses.

1 January 1980 in Physica Scripta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSten Salomonson
Sten Salomonson
ILIngvar Lindgren
Ingvar Lindgren
Ann-Marie PendrillAnn-Marie Pendrill
Ann-Marie Pendrill

20 August 2001 in Physical Review A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPeter Beiersdorfer
Peter Beiersdorfer
SUSteven B. Utter
Steven B. Utter
KWKeith L. Wong
Keith L. Wong
JLJosé R. Crespo López-Urrutia
José R. Crespo López-Urrutia
JBJerry A. Britten
Jerry A. Britten
Ann-Marie PendrillAnn-Marie Pendrill
Ann-Marie Pendrill
The hyperfine splitting of the 1s ground state of hydrogenlike Tl has been measured for the two stable isotopes using emission spectroscopy in the SuperEBIT electron-beam ion trap, giving 3858.22±0.30 Å for 203Tl80+ and 3821.84±0.34 Å for 205Tl80+ with a wavelength difference Δλ=36.38±0.35 Å. This difference is consistent with estimates based on hyperfine anomaly data for neutral Tl only if finite size effects are included in the calculation. By using previously determined nuclear magnetic moments, and applying appropriate corrections for the nuclear charge distribution and radiative effects, the experimental splittings can be interpreted in terms of nuclear magnetization radii 〈rm2〉1/2=5.83(14) fm for 203Tl and 〈rm2〉1/2=5.89(14) fm for 205Tl. These values are 10% larger than derived from single-particle nuclear magnetization models, and are slightly larger than the corresponding charge distributions.

1 May 1994 in Physical Review A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ann-Marie PendrillAnn-Marie Pendrill
Ann-Marie Pendrill
DGDavid S. Gough
David S. Gough
PHPeter Hannaford
Peter Hannaford
Isotope shifts and hyperfine structure in the 369.4-nm 6s-6p1/2 resonance line of the single-valence-electron system Yb+ have been determined with an accuracy of about 1 MHz by Doppler-free saturated absorption spectroscopy in a sputtered vapor. Ab initio many-body perturbation theory calculations in the coupled-cluster approach were then used to evaluate the electronic field shift factor, F=-14.9(2) GHz fm−2, and to estimate the specific mass shift (SMS) factor, KSMS=(1±1)KNMS, where NMS is the normal mass shift. The uncertainty in the calculated F factor is based on the level of agreement between the hyperfine structure constants calculated for 6s and 6p1/2 states using the same wave functions as for the F-factor calculation and the experimentally determined hyperfine-structure constants. The calculated F and KSMS factors have been used to extract values for the difference in mean-square charge radius, δ〈r2 〉1A,A2, between isotope pairs A1,A2, and the related nuclear charge distribution parameter λ1A,A2, which are just within the uncertainties of the tabulated values of Aufmuth et al. [At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 37, 455 (1987)] based on semiempirical estimates of F and assumed values of KSMS.

18 March 1985 in Physical Review Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ann-Marie PendrillAnn-Marie Pendrill
Ann-Marie Pendrill
The electronic part of a possible P- and T-nonconserving neutral-weak-current-induced electric dipole moment in atomic Xe and Hg was calculated with many-body perturbation theory. After the effects of this P- and T-nonconserving interaction on all core orbitals were treated self-consistently, thereby including all single-particle effects to all orders but no correlation effects, the results μe=(5.2×10−23e m)CTσN and μe=−(6.0×10−22e m)CTσN, respectively, were obtained for Xe and Hg. The value for Xe can be combined with the recent experimental result, |μe(Xe129)|<10−28e m, to give the upper limit |CT|<2×10−6.