John Oliffe

Dr. John Oliffe

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2016 in Clinical Psychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZSZac Seidler
Zac Seidler
ADAlexei J. Dawes
Alexei J. Dawes
Simon M. RiceSimon M. Rice
Simon M. Rice
JOJohn Oliffe
John Oliffe
HDHaryana Dhillon
Haryana Dhillon

1 January 2021 in International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JOJohn Oliffe
John Oliffe
MKMary T. Kelly
Mary T. Kelly
GMGabriela Gonzalez Montaner
Gabriela Gonzalez Montaner
WKWellam F. Yu Ko
Wellam F. Yu Ko
COVID-19 restrictions have transitioned in-person qualitative research interviews to virtual platforms. The purpose of the current article is to detail some benefits and concessions derived from our experiences of using Zoom to interview men about their intimate partner relationship breakdowns and service providers who work with men to build better relationships. Three benefits; 1) Rich therapeutic value, 2) There’s no place like home, and 3) Reduced costs to extend recruitment reach and inclusivity, highlighted Zoom’s salutary value, the data richness afforded by being interviewed from home, and the potential for cost-effectively progressing qualitative study designs. In particular, reduced labour and travel costs made viable wider reaching participant recruitment and multi-site data collection. The concessions; 1) Being there differently, 2) Choppy purviews and 3) Preparing and pacing, and adjusting to the self-stream revealed the need for interviewers to nimbly adjust to circumstances outside their direct control. Included were inherent challenges for adapting to diverse interviewee locations, technology limits and discordant audio-visual feeds. Amongst these concessions there was resignation that many in-person interview nuances were lost amid the virtual platform demanding unique interviewer skills to compensate some of those changes. Zoom interviews will undoubtedly continue post COVID-19 and attention should be paid to emergent ethical and operational issues.

1 March 2011 in Journal of Men's Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJoan Evans
Joan Evans
BFBlye Frank
Blye Frank
JOJohn Oliffe
John Oliffe
DGDavid Gregory
David Gregory
Gender, the complex of social relations and practices attached to biological sex, is one of the most important socio-cultural factors influencing health and health-related behavior. Although a large body of health research suggests that men with similar social disadvantages as women experience poorer health outcomes in relation to disability, chronic illness, injury rates and mortality, men's health is rarely deconstructed through the lens of gender. The purpose of this article is to increase understanding of the ways in which masculinities intersect with other social determinants of health creating health disparities among men, and to provide direction for masculine affirming health interventions aimed specifically at men. With the goal of promoting the health of men and decreasing health disparities, the authors have developed, within the Canadian context, an innovative theoretical framework for men's health, Health, Illness, Men and Masculinities (HIMM), based on the influence of masculinity throughout the lifecourse. We discuss three main phases of men's lifecourse showing how masculinity intersects with other social determinants of health differently during youth, middle-age and the older years. The HIMM Framework points to the need for research and theory development that moves us beyond a limited focus on any one individual man to consider men's health and illness practices in the larger social context within which masculinity is defined and produced. It can thus advance men's health research and theory development, and provide direction for policy, education, health care delivery and health promotion initiatives aimed specifically at men in many locales, contexts and countries.

1 July 2007 in Qualitative Health Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JOJohn Oliffe
John Oliffe
JBJoan L. Bottorff
Joan L. Bottorff
Photo elicitation studies have attracted modest attention in qualitative health research. However, few researchers have focused exclusively on men's health and/or illness experiences. In this article, the authors discuss the benefits of using photo elicitation among a subcohort of 19 prostate cancer survivors from a larger ethnographic study. Specifically, participants were asked to imagine that they were being paid to mount a photographic exhibition entitled Living With My Prostate Cancer, an exhibition that would show prostate cancer from their unique perspective. The authors subsequently discussed the photographs with the participants during individual interviews using photo elicitation techniques. The methods provided some unique and unanticipated benefits, the details of which the authors share to guide researchers considering similar approaches. In addition, the authors make specific recommendations for future photo elicitation applications to men's health research.

1 May 2005 in Social Science & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JOJohn Oliffe
John Oliffe

27 June 2011 in Sociology of Health & Illness
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JJJoy L. Johnson
Joy L. Johnson
JOJohn Oliffe
John Oliffe
MKMary T. Kelly
Mary T. Kelly
PGPaul Galdas
Paul Galdas
JOJohn S. Ogrodniczuk
John S. Ogrodniczuk