Elisa De Paolis

Dr. Elisa De Paolis

Molecular Diagnostic and Genomic Laboratory, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 May 2019 in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EPElisa De Paolis
Elisa De Paolis
GSGiovanni Luca Scaglione
Giovanni Luca Scaglione
MBMaria De Bonis
Maria De Bonis
AMAngelo Minucci
Angelo Minucci
ETTORE CAPOLUONGOETTORE CAPOLUONGO
ETTORE CAPOLUONGO
Loss of function mutations in the CYP24A1 gene, involved in vitamin D catabolism and in calcium homeostasis, are known to be the genetic drivers of both idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia (IIH) and adult renal stone disease. Recently, also defects in the SLC34A1 gene, encoding for the renal sodium-phosphate transporter NaPi-IIa, were associated with the disease. IIH typically affects infants and pediatric patients with a syndrome characterized by severe hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, suppressed parathyroid hormone level and nephrolithiasis. In SLC34A1 mutated carriers, hypophosphatemia is also a typical biochemical tract. IIH may also persist undiagnosed into adulthood, causing an increased risk of nephrocalcinosis and renal complication. To note, a clinical heterogeneity characterizes IIH manifestation, principally due to the controversial gene-dose effect and, to the strong influence of environmental factors. The present review is aimed to provide an overview of the current molecular findings on the IIH disorder, giving a comprehensive description of the association between genotype and biochemical and clinical phenotype of the affected patients. We also underline that patients may benefit from genetic testing into a targeted diagnostic and therapeutic workflow.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDiletta Piana
Diletta Piana
FIFederica Iavarone
Federica Iavarone
EPElisa De Paolis
Elisa De Paolis
GDGennaro Daniele
Gennaro Daniele
FPFederico Parisella
Federico Parisella
AUAndrea Urbani
Andrea Urbani
Tumor heterogeneity refers to the diversity observed among tumor cells: both between different tumors (inter-tumor heterogeneity) and within a single tumor (intra-tumor heterogeneity). These cells can display distinct morphological and phenotypic characteristics, including variations in cellular morphology, metastatic potential and variability treatment responses among patients. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of such heterogeneity is necessary for deciphering tumor-specific mechanisms that may be diagnostically and therapeutically valuable. Innovative and multidisciplinary approaches are needed to understand this complex feature. In this context, proteogenomics has been emerging as a significant resource for integrating omics fields such as genomics and proteomics. By combining data obtained from both Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies and mass spectrometry (MS) analyses, proteogenomics aims to provide a comprehensive view of tumor heterogeneity. This approach reveals molecular alterations and phenotypic features related to tumor subtypes, potentially identifying therapeutic biomarkers. Many achievements have been made; however, despite continuous advances in proteogenomics-based methodologies, several challenges remain: in particular the limitations in sensitivity and specificity and the lack of optimal study models. This review highlights the impact of proteogenomics on characterizing tumor phenotypes, focusing on the critical challenges and current limitations of its use in different clinical and preclinical models for tumor phenotypic characterization.

13 December 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLuciano Giaco'
Luciano Giaco'
FPFernando Palluzzi
Fernando Palluzzi
DGDavide Guido
Davide Guido
CNcamilla nero
camilla nero
FGFlavia Giacomini
Flavia Giacomini
AMAngelo Minucci
Angelo Minucci
In January 2022, our institution launched a comprehensive cancer genome profiling program on 10 cancer types using a non-IVD solution named the TruSight Oncology 500 Assay provided by Illumina®. The assay analyzes both DNA and RNA, identifying Single-Nucleotide Variants (SNV)s and Insertion–Deletion (InDel) in 523 genes, as well as known and unknown fusions and splicing variants in 55 genes and Copy Number Alterations (CNVs), Mutational Tumor Burden (MTB) and Microsatellite Instability (MSI). According to the current European IVD Directive 98/79/EC, an internal validation was performed before running the test. A dedicated open-source bioinformatics pipeline was developed for data postprocessing, panel assessment and embedding in high-performance computing framework using the container technology to ensure scalability and reproducibility. Our protocols, applied to 71 DNA and 64 RNA samples, showed full agreement between the TruSight Oncology 500 assay and standard approaches, with only minor limitations, allowing to routinely perform our protocol in patient screening.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSGiovanni Luca Scaglione
Giovanni Luca Scaglione
PCPaola Concolino
Paola Concolino
MBMaria De Bonis
Maria De Bonis
EPElisa De Paolis
Elisa De Paolis
AMAngelo Minucci
Angelo Minucci
ETTORE CAPOLUONGOETTORE CAPOLUONGO
ETTORE CAPOLUONGO
BRCA1/2 screening in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Syndrome (HBOC) is an essential step for effective patients’ management. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) can rapidly provide high throughput and reliable information about the qualitative and quantitative status of tumor-associated genes. Straightforwardly, bioinformatics methods play a key role in molecular diagnostics pipelines. BRCA1/2 genes were evaluated with our NGS workflow, coupled with Multiplex Amplicon Quantification (MAQ) and Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) assays. Variant calling was performed on Amplicon Suite, while Copy Number Variant (CNV) prediction by in house and commercial CNV tools, before confirmatory MAQ/MLPA testing. The germline profile of BRCA genes revealed a unique HBOC pattern. Although variant calling analysis pinpointed heterozygote and homozygote polymorphisms on BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, the CNV predicted by our script suggested two conflicting interpretations: BRCA1 duplication and/or BRCA2 deletion. Our commercial software reported a BRCA1 duplication, in contrast with variant calling results. Finally, the MAQ/MLPA assays assessed a whole BRCA2 copy loss. In silico CNV analysis is a time and cost-saving procedure to powerfully identify possible Large Rearrangements using robust and efficient NGS pipelines. Our layout shows as bioinformatics algorithms alone cannot completely and correctly identify whole BRCA1/2 deletions/duplications. In particular, the complete deletion of an entire gene, like in our case, cannot be solved without alternative strategies as MLPA/MAQ. These findings support the crucial role of bioinformatics in deciphering pitfalls within NGS data analysis.

22 February 2021 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPElisa De Paolis
Elisa De Paolis
Andrea UrbaniAndrea Urbani
Andrea Urbani
LSLisa Salvatore
Lisa Salvatore
LFLaura Foca
Laura Foca
Giampaolo TortoraGiampaolo Tortora
Giampaolo Tortora
PCPaola Concolino
Paola Concolino
Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies with poor prognosis and a high fatality rate. The disease presents in advanced stages where the treatment is ineffective. Regarding GBC pathogenesis, as with other neoplasia, this tumor is a multifactorial disorder involving different causative factors such as environmental, microbial, metabolic, and molecular. Genetic alterations can be germline or somatic that involving proto-oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, cell cycle genes, and growth factors. The ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene, coding a serine/threonine kinase involved in the early stages of the homologous recombination (HR) mechanism, is one of the most altered genes in GBC. Here, we present the molecular characterization of a novel germline ATM large genomic rearrangement (LGR) identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis in an Italian woman diagnosed with metastatic GBC at the age of 55. The results underline the importance of expanding the NGS approach in gallbladder cancer in order to propose new molecular markers of predisposition and prognosis exploitable by novel targeted therapies that may improve the response of patients with ATM-deficient cancers.

1 April 2025 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCarolina Sassorossi
Carolina Sassorossi
JEJessica Evangelista
Jessica Evangelista
ASAlessio Stefani
Alessio Stefani
MCMarco Chiappetta
Marco Chiappetta
AMAntonella Martino
Antonella Martino
Filippo LococoFilippo Lococo
Filippo Lococo
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may be released from neoplastic cells into biological fluids through apoptosis, necrosis, or active release. In patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ctDNA analysis is being introduced in clinical practice only for advanced disease management. Nevertheless, an interesting and promising field of application is the analysis of ctDNA in the management of early stage non-small-cell lung cancer, both for evaluation before treatment, such as diagnosis and screening, and for prediction of histology or pathological features. Methods: A thorough review of the literature published between 2000 and 2024 was performed on PubMed, utilizing the advanced search feature to narrow down titles and abstracts containing the following keywords: ctDNA, early stage, and NSCLC. A total of 20 studies that met all inclusion criteria were chosen for this review. Results: In this review, we summarize the increasing evidence suggesting that ctDNA has potential clinical applications in the management of patients with early stage NSCLC. ctDNA levels in early stage cancers are very low, posing many technical challenges in improving the detection rate and sensitivity, especially in clinical practice, if it is to be implemented for early detection. Presently, the main limitation of ctDNA experimental and clinical studies, especially in early stage settings, is the lack of definitive standardization and consensus regarding methodology, the absence of systematically validated analyses, and the lack of adoption of sensitive approaches. Conclusions: Possible applications of this analyte open up new fields of diagnosis, treatment, and follow up, which are less invasive and more precise than other approaches currently in use, especially in early stage NSCLC patients.