This study aims to examine current research about trauma-exposed, justice-involved (TEJI) female youth, and evaluate the current literature regarding the effectiveness of gender-specific interventions aimed at reducing their recidivism. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology was utilized to examine quantitative and qualitative literature, published from 2000 through March 2020, about interventions for female justice-involved youth with trauma exposure. Analysis of selected studies utilized an integrated framework based on Andrew’s Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model and Lipsey’s factors of effectiveness, which reviewed studies showing the relationship between female justice-involved youth with mental health symptomologies and trauma. The findings show that effective intervention for this population targets the youth’s negative internal mechanisms related to trauma-subsequent psychosocial problems. These studies suggest that trauma-sensitive modalities have the potential to mitigate the further risk of problematic external behaviors. All studies had limited sample sizes, low follow-up rates, and unknown long-term outcomes. Future research should explore dimensions of sustainability and achieving stability in relation to intervention setting. Selecting the proper venue and facilitator for quality implementation and stability of setting is critical in delivering effective therapies. Modifications in public expectations of juvenile justice policy and practice, from disciplinary to therapeutic approaches, is needed.

Introduction: Dialysis social workers are integral in the transplant evaluation process; however, research on dialysis social workers’ perspectives on access to kidney transplantation is limited. Methods: A mixed methods study examining dialysis social workers’ perspectives on transplant barriers and facilitators. Dialysis social workers completed online surveys and participated in virtual, semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Results: Twenty-seven dialysis social workers completed surveys, and 15 participated in qualitative interviews. Participants were predominantly female (93%) and White (89%). While the majority (67%) had practiced as a social worker for 6+ years, most had ≤5 years of dialysis experience (52%). The majority described the transplant referral process as somewhat easy (67%) and rated their relationship with transplant programs as either fair or good (78%). Both survey and interview data identified similar patient-level barriers, such as lack of social support and obesity. Interviews further elucidated organizational and system level barriers including tensions between dialysis and transplant centers, transplant center accessibility, and systemic discrimination. Identified facilitators included patient motivation, transplant center communication, and transplant resources. Conclusion: Dialysis social workers provided a unique perspective on barriers and facilitators to kidney transplantation. While barriers to transplant were often considered at the patient level, organizational and system level factors were crucial to understanding transplant access. These findings could inform future efforts between dialysis and transplant centers to improve access to kidney transplantation.