Charlotte De Backer

Dr. Charlotte De Backer


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 July 2004 in Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DSDavid P. Schmitt
David P. Schmitt
LALidia Alcalay
Lidia Alcalay
MAMelissa Allensworth
Melissa Allensworth
JAJüri Allik
Jüri Allik
LALara Ault
Lara Ault
AZAgata Zupanèiè
Agata Zupanèiè
As part of the International Sexuality Description Project, a total of 17,804 participants from 62 cultural regions completedthe RelationshipQuestionnaire(RQ), a self-reportmeasure of adult romanticattachment. Correlational analyses within each culture suggested that the Model of Self and the Model of Other scales of the RQ were psychometrically valid within most cultures. Contrary to expectations, the Model of Self and Model of Other dimensions of the RQ did not underlie the four-category model of attachment in the same way across all cultures. Analyses of specific attachment styles revealed that secure romantic attachment was normative in 79% of cultures and that preoccupied romantic attachment was particularly prevalent in East Asian cultures. Finally, the romantic attachment profiles of individual nations were correlated with sociocultural indicators in ways that supported evolutionary theories of romantic attachment and basic human mating strategies.

1 March 2015 in Personality and Individual Differences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sara PabianSara Pabian
Sara Pabian
CBCharlotte De Backer
Charlotte De Backer
HVHeidi Vandebosch
Heidi Vandebosch


1 April 2020 in Appetite
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBCharlotte De Backer
Charlotte De Backer
SESara Erreygers
Sara Erreygers
CCCharlotte De Cort
Charlotte De Cort
FVFrederic Vandermoere
Frederic Vandermoere
ADAlexander Dhoest
Alexander Dhoest
SBSofie Van Bauwel
Sofie Van Bauwel

30 October 2014 in Ecology of Food and Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBCharlotte De Backer
Charlotte De Backer
LHLiselot Hudders
Liselot Hudders
This study explores vegetarians’ and semi-vegetarians’ motives for reducing their meat intake. Participants are categorized as vegetarians (remove all meat from their diet); semi-vegetarians (significantly reduce meat intake: at least three days a week); or light semi-vegetarians (mildly reduce meat intake: once or twice a week). Most differences appear between vegetarians and both groups of semi-vegetarians. Animal-rights and ecological concerns, together with taste preferences, predict vegetarianism, while an increase in health motives increases the odds of being semi-vegetarian. Even within each group, subgroups with different motives appear, and it is recommended that future researchers pay more attention to these differences.