Lukasz Henszel

Dr. Lukasz Henszel

European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 November 2017 in BMC Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLukasz Henszel
Lukasz Henszel
UMUlrich Marcus
Ulrich Marcus
SSSusanne Schink
Susanne Schink
NSNigel Sherriff
Nigel Sherriff
AJAnna-Marie Jones
Anna-Marie Jones
MMMassimo Mirandola
Massimo Mirandola
Knowledge of HIV status can be important in reducing the risk of HIV exposure. In a European sample of men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM), we aimed to identify factors associated with HIV serostatus disclosure to the most recent anal intercourse (AI) partner. We also aimed to describe the impact of HIV serostatus disclosure on HIV exposure risks. During 2013 and 2014, 4901 participants were recruited for the bio-behavioural Sialon-II study in 13 European cities. Behavioural data were collected with a self-administered paper questionnaire. Biological specimens were tested for HIV antibodies. Factors associated with HIV serostatus disclosure with the most recent AI partner were examined using bivariate and multilevel multivariate logistic regression analysis. We also describe the role of serostatus disclosure for HIV exposure of the most recent AI partner. Thirty-five percent (n = 1450) of the study participants reported mutual serostatus disclosure with their most recent AI partner or disclosed having HIV to their partner. Most of these disclosures occurred between steady partners (74%, n = 1077). In addition to the type of partner and HIV diagnosis status, other factors positively associated with HIV serostatus disclosure in the multilevel multivariate logistic regression model were recent testing, no condom use, and outness regarding sexual orientation. Disclosure rates were lowest in three south-eastern European cities. Following condom use (51%, n = 2099), HIV serostatus disclosure (20%, n = 807) was the second most common prevention approach with the most recent AI partner, usually resulting in serosorting. A potential HIV exposure risk for the partner was reported by 26% (111/432) of HIV antibody positive study participants. In 18% (20/111) of exposure episodes, an incorrect HIV serostatus was unknowingly communicated. Partner exposures were equally distributed between steady and non-steady partners. The probability of HIV exposure through condomless AI is substantially lower after serostatus disclosure compared to non-disclosure. Incorrect knowledge of one’s HIV status contributes to a large proportion of HIV exposures amongst European MSM. Maintaining or improving condom use for anal intercourse with non-steady partners, frequent testing to update HIV serostatus awareness, and increased serostatus disclosure particularly between steady partners are confirmed as key aspects for reducing HIV exposures amongst European MSM.

22 June 2017 in AIDS and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLukasz Henszel
Lukasz Henszel
MMMassimo Mirandola
Massimo Mirandola
LGLorenzo Gios
Lorenzo Gios
NSNigel Sherriff
Nigel Sherriff
JPJohn Pachankis
John Pachankis
MNMarta Niedźwiedzka-Stadnik
Marta Niedźwiedzka-Stadnik
Within the MSM population, men who have sex with both men and women (MSMW) are identified as a high-risk group both worldwide and in Europe. In a multi-centred bio-behavioural cross-sectional study, we aimed to assess the relationship(s) between socio-demographic factors, stigma, sexual behavioural patterns, test seeking behaviour and sero-status amongst MSMW. A multi-level analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with being MSMW versus Men who have Sex with Men Only (MSMO). A total of 4901 MSM were enrolled across the 13 study sites. Participants were categorised as MSMW in the 12.64% of the cases. Factors such as educational status, perceived homonegativity, testing facilities knowledge and HIV testing lifetime seem to be relevant factors when characterising the MSMW group. The results highlight the vulnerability of MSMW and the wide spectrum of risky behavioural and psycho-social patterns, particularly in terms of HIV testing, ‘outness’, and perceived stigma. Los Hombres que tienen Sexo con Hombres y Mujeres (HSHM) son un grupo de población de alto riesgo dentro de los HSH. Evaluar la relación entre factores socio-demográficos, estigma, patrones de conducta sexual y de búsqueda de la prueba y el estado serológico de los HSHM. Estudio bio-conductual multicéntrico transversal. Análisis multinivel para identificar factores asociados con ser HSHM respecto a los Hombres que Sólo tienen Sexo con Hombres. Se reclutaron 4.901 HSH en 13 ciudades, siendo un 12,64% HSHM. El nivel educativo, la homonegatividad percibida, el conocimiento de los lugares de realización de la prueba y la prueba del VIH alguna vez son factores relevantes para caracterizar los HSHM. Los resultados subrayan la vulnerabilidad de los HSHM y la diversidad de conductas y patrones psicosociales de riesgo, particularmente en términos de la prueba del VIH, visibilidad de la identidad sexual y estigma percibido.

6 August 2018 in BMC Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLukasz Henszel
Lukasz Henszel
UMUlrich Marcus
Ulrich Marcus
CNChristiana Nöstlinger
Christiana Nöstlinger
MRMagdalena Rosińska
Magdalena Rosińska
NSNigel Sherriff
Nigel Sherriff
MMMassimo Mirandola
Massimo Mirandola
Reducing the number of people with undiagnosed HIV infection is a major goal of HIV control and prevention efforts in Europe and elsewhere. We analysed data from a large multi-city European bio-behavioural survey conducted among Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) for previously undiagnosed HIV infections, and aimed to characterise undiagnosed MSM who test less frequently than recommended. Data on sexual behaviours and social characteristics of MSM with undiagnosed HIV infection from Sialon II, a bio-behavioural cross-sectional survey conducted in 13 European cities in 2013/2014, were compared with HIV-negative MSM. Based on reported HIV-testing patterns, we distinguished two subgroups: MSM with a negative HIV test result within 12 months prior to the study, i.e. undiagnosed incident infection, and HIV positive MSM with unknown onset of infection. Bivariate and multivariate associations of explanatory variables were analysed. Distinct multivariate multi-level random-intercept models were estimated for the entire group and both subgroups. Among 497 participants with HIV-reactive specimens, 234 (47.1%) were classified as previously diagnosed, 106 (21.3%) as incident, and 58 (11.7%) as unknown onset based on self-reported status and testing history. MSM with incident HIV infection were twice as likely (odds ratio (OR) = 2.22, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.17–4.21) to have used recreational substances during their last anal sex encounter and four times more likely (OR = 3.94, 95%CI: 2.14–7.27) not to discuss their HIV status with the last anal sex partner(s). MSM with unknown onset of HIV infection were 3.6 times more likely (OR = 3.61, 95%CI: 1.74–7.50) to report testing for a sexually transmitted infection (STI) during the last 12 months. Approximately one third of the study participants who are living with HIV were unaware of their infection. Almost two-third (65%) of those with undiagnosed HIV appeared to have acquired the infection recently, emphasizing a need for more frequent testing. Men with the identified behavioural characteristics could be considered as primary target group for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) to avoid HIV infection. The increased odds of those with unknown onset of HIV infection to have had an STI test in the past year strongly suggests a lost opportunity to offer HIV testing.

17 May 2011 in Zoonoses and Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Danuta Kosik-BogackaDanuta Kosik-Bogacka
Danuta Kosik-Bogacka
EKE. Kalisinska
E. Kalisinska
LHLukasz Henszel
Lukasz Henszel
WKW. Kuzna‐Grygiel
W. Kuzna‐Grygiel

1 January 2006
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LHLukasz Henszel
Lukasz Henszel
WKWanda Kuźna-Grygiel
Wanda Kuźna-Grygiel

LHLukasz Henszel
Lukasz Henszel
EKElisabeth E. Kanitz
Elisabeth E. Kanitz
AGAndrea Grisold
Andrea Grisold
HHHeidemarie Holzmann
Heidemarie Holzmann
SAStephan W. Aberle
Stephan W. Aberle
DSDaniela Schmid
Daniela Schmid
On 21 January 2019, public health authorities of two neighboring Austrian provinces reported an increase in measles cases. We investigated this occurrence to identify clusters of epidemiologically linked cases and the associated vaccination status in order to generate hypotheses on those factors explaining the size of the measles clusters. Probable cases were residents of the provinces of Styria or Salzburg with clinical presentation of measles after 1 January 2019 who were linked to a confirmed case using RNA virus detection. We collected data on age, rash onset, certificate-based vaccination status and reasons for being unvaccinated. Contact history was used to identify chains of transmission. By 11 March, we identified 47 cases, with 40 (85.1%) in unvaccinated patients. A cluster of 35 cases with a median age of seven years (IQR: 1–11) occurred between 9 January and 20 February in the province of Styria due to one transmission chain with four case generations. Of 31 vaccine-eligible cases, 25 (80.6%) were unvaccinated, of which 13 refused vaccination. Between 10 January and 1 March, we identified 12 cases as part of five unlinked clusters in the province of Salzburg. Each of these five clusters consisted of two generations: the primary case and the successive cases (median age: 22 years, IQR: 11–35). Eleven of 12 cases occurred in unvaccinated patients, with none of the 11 having a vaccination-refusing attitude. An extended measles cluster in a vaccination-refusing community, compared to five short-lived clusters concurrently occurring in the neighboring province, illustrates how vaccine refusal may hamper control of transmission.