Michael Rink

Prof. Dr. Michael Rink

Dept. of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2013 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michael RinkMichael Rink
Michael Rink
MBMarko Babjuk
Marko Babjuk
JCJames WF Catto
James WF Catto
PJPatrice Jichlinski
Patrice Jichlinski
SSShahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat
JWJ. Alfred Witjes
J. Alfred Witjes

1 April 2012 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michael RinkMichael Rink
Michael Rink
FCFelix K. Chun
Felix K. Chun
RDRoland Dahlem
Roland Dahlem
ASArmin Soave
Armin Soave
SMSarah Minner
Sarah Minner
SRSabine Riethdorf
Sabine Riethdorf

1 August 2015 in European Urology Focus
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michael RinkMichael Rink
Michael Rink
JCJoseph J. Crivelli
Joseph J. Crivelli
SSShahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat
FCFelix K. Chun
Felix K. Chun
EMEdward M. Messing
Edward M. Messing
MSMark S. Soloway
Mark S. Soloway

24 August 2010 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Michael RinkMichael Rink
Michael Rink
FCFelix K.H. Chun
Felix K.H. Chun
SMSarah Minner
Sarah Minner
MFMartin Friedrich
Martin Friedrich
OMOliver Mauermann
Oliver Mauermann
SRSabine Riethdorf
Sabine Riethdorf
What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Circulating tumour cells (CTC) have prognostic relevance for patients with different metastatic carcinomas. Detection of CTC using the CellSearch system has also been reported in bladder cancer, but mainly in patients with metastatic disease. This is the largest report demonstrating that detection of CTC in non‐metastatic bladder cancer patients is feasible using the CellSearch system. Presence of CTC may be predictive for early systemic disease. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively detect and evaluate the biological significance of circulating tumour cells (CTC) in patients with bladder cancer, especially in those patients with non‐metastatic, advanced bladder cancer (NMABC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2007 and January 2009, blood samples of 50 consecutive patients with localized bladder cancer and five patients with metastatic disease scheduled for cystectomy were prospectively investigated for CTC. Peripheral blood (7.5 ml) was drawn before cystectomy. Detection of CTC was performed using the USA Food and Drug Administration‐approved CellSearch TM system. Data were compared with the clinical and histopathological findings. RESULTS: CTC were detected in 15 of 50 patients (30%) with non‐metastatic disease and five of five patients with metastatic disease. The overall mean number of CTC was 33.7 (range: 1–372; median: 2). In non‐metastatic patients, the mean number of CTC was 3.1 (range: 1–11; median: 1). Except for a univariate association between CTC with vessel infiltration ( P = 0.047), all other common clinical and histopathological parameters did not reveal a significant correlation with CTC detection. A median 1‐year follow up was available for 53 patients (96.4%). Ten out of 19 preoperatively CTC‐positive patients died as a result of cancer progression. CTC‐positive patients showed significantly worse overall ( P = 0.001), progression‐free ( P < 0.001) and cancer specific survival ( P < 0.001) compared to preoperatively CTC‐negative patients. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study demonstrating that detection of CTC in NMABC patients is feasible using the CellSearch TM system. Our findings suggest that the presence of CTC may be predictive for early systemic disease.

1 October 2016 in Translational Andrology and Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPhillip Marks
Phillip Marks
ASArmin Soave
Armin Soave
SSShahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat
HFHarun Fajkovic
Harun Fajkovic
MFMargit Fisch
Margit Fisch
Michael RinkMichael Rink
Michael Rink
While men are at a considerable higher risk of developing urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), women present with more advanced disease stages and seem to experience unfavorable outcomes. Evaluating specific differences in the UCB incidence and outcomes between both genders in the non-muscle invasive, muscle-invasive or locally advanced and metastatic setting, as well as determining the underlying causes of disease, may allow optimizing treatment and improving the quality of urological care among both genders. In this review we summarize the best evidence and most recent findings on gender-specific differences in UCB incidence and outcomes. In addition, we present a comprehensive overview on established and potential reasons for differences in gender-specific UCB outcomes, including disparities in the pelvic anatomy, the diagnostic work-up, the modality and quality of treatment, the exposure to risk factors, the degradation of carcinogens as well as the sex-hormone signaling.

1 November 2016 in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAurélie Mbeutcha
Aurélie Mbeutcha
SSShahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat
MRMalte Rieken
Malte Rieken
Michael RinkMichael Rink
Michael Rink
EXEvanguelos Xylinas
Evanguelos Xylinas
Tobias KlatteTobias Klatte
Tobias Klatte