Structures of the simplest replisome: The DNA replisome performs concerted parental-strand separation and DNA synthesis on both strands. Gao et al. report the cryo–electron microscopy structures of the minimum set of bacteriophage T7 proteins that can carry out leading- and lagging-strand synthesis at the replication fork (see the Perspective by Li and O'Donnell). Three key enzymes involved in DNA replication—DNA polymerase, helicase, and primase—were visualized in complex with substrate DNA, demonstrating their highly dynamic organizations on both strands. Comparison of prokaryotic and eukaryotic replisomes reveals evolutionarily conserved operating principles and provides a structural basis for understanding coordination among DNA replication, recombination, and repair. Science , this issue p. eaav7003 ; see also p. 814

Objective: To assess the relationship between the variant rpoB mutations and the degree of rifampin (RIF)/rifabutin (RFB) resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis). Methods: We analyzed the whole rpoB gene in 177 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates and quantified their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) using microplate-based assays. Results: The results revealed that of the 177 isolates, 116 were resistant to both RIF and RFB. There were 38 mutated patterns within the sequenced whole rpoB gene of the 120 isolates. Statistical analysis indicated that mutations, S450L, H445D, H445Y, and H445R, were associated with RIF and RFB resistance. Of these mutations, S450L, H445D, and H445Y were associated with high-level RIF and RFB MIC. H445R was associated with high-level RIF MIC, but not high-level RFB MIC. D435V and L452P were associated with only RIF, but not RFB resistance. Q432K and Q432L were associated with high-level RFB MIC. Several single mutations without statistical association with rifamycin resistance, such as V170F, occurred exclusively in low-level RIF but high-level RFB resistant isolates. Additionally, although cross-resistance to RIF and RFB is common, 21 RIF-resistant/RFB-susceptible isolates were identified. Conclusion: This study highlighted the complexity of rifamycin resistance. Identification of the rpoB polymorphism will be helpful to diagnose the RIF-resistant tuberculosis that has the potential to benefit from a treatment regimen including RFB.

Primer design is essential to conduct whole plasmid site‐directed mutagenesis for protein study. Traditionally, primers of mutagenesis are designed manually that is time‐consuming and fallible. Here, we present a Python script for searching primers by presetting parameters of nucleotide composition and percentage of guanine‐cytosine (GC content). The running results showed that the script is able to search primers with mutations of target residue automatically. This script may facilitate primer design for whole plasmid site‐directed mutagenesis and aid protein mutant construction.

Objective: To explore the association between the variant mutations within embB and ubiA, and the degree of ethambutol (EMB) resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) isolates. Methods: A total of 146 M. tuberculosis isolates were used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of EMB with a 96-well microplate-based assay. The mutations within embB and ubiA among these isolates were identified with DNA sequencing. Moreover, a multivariate regression model and a computer model were established to assess the effects of mutations on EMB resistance. Results: Our data showed that overall 100 isolates exhibited 28 mutated patterns within the sequenced embB and ubiA. Statistical analysis indicated that embB mutations Met306Val, Met306Ile, Gly406Ala, and Gln497Arg, were strongly associated with EMB resistance. Of these mutations, Met306Val and Gln497Arg were significantly associated with high-level EMB resistance. Almost all multiple mutations occurred in high-level EMB-resistant isolates. Although the mutation within ubiA accompanied with embB mutation presented exclusively in EMB-resistant isolates, four single ubiA mutations (Ala39Glu, Ser173Ala, Trp175Cys, and Val283Leu) leading to protein instability were observed in EMB-susceptible isolates. Conclusion: This study highlighted the complexity of EMB resistance. Some individual mutations and multiple mutations within embB and ubiA contributed to the different levels of EMB resistance.