Manuela Deidda

Dr. Manuela Deidda


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2014 in Journal of Transport Geography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJuan Gabriel Brida
Juan Gabriel Brida
MDManuela Deidda
Manuela Deidda
MPManuela Pulina
Manuela Pulina

22 November 2014 in Journal of Family and Economic Issues
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDManuela Deidda
Manuela Deidda

28 March 2025 in BMJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPeter Craig
Peter Craig
MCMhairi Campbell
Mhairi Campbell
MDManuela Deidda
Manuela Deidda
RDRuth Dundas
Ruth Dundas
JGJudith Green
Judith Green
MWMartin White
Martin White
Natural experiments are widely used to evaluate the impacts on health of changes in policies, infrastructure, and services. The UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) have published a new framework for conducting and using evidence from natural experimental evaluations. The framework defines key concepts and describes recent advances in designing and planning evaluations of natural experiments, including the relevance of a systems perspective, mixed methods, and stakeholder involvement. It provides an overview of the strengths, weaknesses, applicability, and limitations of the range of methods now available, and makes good practice recommendations for researchers, funders, publishers, and users of evidence.

2 July 2015 in International Review of Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDManuela Deidda
Manuela Deidda

1 January 2019 in Social Science & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDManuela Deidda
Manuela Deidda
CGClaudia Geue
Claudia Geue
NKNoemi Kreif
Noemi Kreif
RDRuth Dundas
Ruth Dundas
EMEmma McIntosh
Emma McIntosh
Internationally, policy makers are increasingly focussed on reducing the detrimental consequences and rising costs associated with unhealthy diets, inactivity, smoking, alcohol and other risk factors on the health of their populations. This has led to an increase in the demand for evidence-based, cost-effective Population Health Interventions (PHIs) to reverse this trend. Given that research designs such as randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are often not suited to the evaluation of PHIs, Natural Experiments (NEs) are now frequently being used as a design to evaluate such complex, preventive PHIs. However, current guidance for economic evaluation focusses on RCT designs and therefore does not address the specific challenges of NE designs. Using such guidance can lead to sub-optimal design, data collection and analysis for NEs, leading to bias in the estimated effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PHI. As a consequence, there is a growing recognition of the need to identify a robust methodological framework for the design and conducting of economic evaluations alongside such NEs. This paper outlines the challenges inherent to the design and conduct of economic evaluations of PHIs alongside NEs, providing a comprehensive framework and outlining a research agenda in this area.

18 May 2017 in Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMaria Giné-Garriga
Maria Giné-Garriga
Laura Coll-PlanasLaura Coll-Planas
Laura Coll-Planas
MGMíriam Guerra
Míriam Guerra
ÀDÀlex Domingo
Àlex Domingo
MRMarta Roqué
Marta Roqué
ASAntoni Salvà
Antoni Salvà
Older adults are the fastest growing segment of the world‘s population. Recent evidence indicates that excessive sitting time is harmful to health, independent of meeting the recommended moderate to vigorous physical activity (PA) guidelines. The SITLESS project aims to determine whether exercise referral schemes (ERS) can be enhanced by self-management strategies (SMSs) to reduce sedentary behaviour (SB), increase PA and improve health, quality of life and function in the long term, as well as psychosocial outcomes in community-dwelling older European citizens from four countries, within a three-armed pragmatic randomised controlled trial, compared with ERS alone and also with general recommendations about PA. A total of 1338 older adults will be included in this study, recruited from four European countries through different existing primary prevention pathways. Participants will be randomly allocated into an ERS of 16 weeks (32 sessions, 45–60 min per session), ERS enhanced by seven sessions of SMSs and four telephone prompts, or a control group. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, month 4 (end of ERS intervention), month 16 (12 months post intervention) and month 22 (18 months post intervention). Primary outcomes will include measures of SB (time spent sedentary) and PA (counts per minute). Secondary outcomes will include muscle and physical function, health economics’ related outcomes, anthropometry, quality of life, social networks, anxiety and depressive symptoms, disability, fear of falling, executive function and fatigue. A process evaluation will be conducted throughout the trial. The full analysis set will follow an intention-to-treat principle and will include all randomised participants for whom a baseline assessment is conducted. The study hypothesis will be tested with mixed linear models with repeated measures, to assess changes in the main outcomes (SB and PA) over time (baseline to month 22) and between study arms. The findings of this study may help inform the design and implementation of more effective interventions to reduce SB and increase PA levels, and hence improve long-term health outcomes in the older adult population. SITLESS aims to support policy-makers in deciding how or whether ERS should be further implemented or restructured in order to increase its adherence, impact and cost-effectiveness. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02629666 . Registered 19 November 2015.